增加运动时的脑力消耗是否会改变超重个体的底物氧化和心肺结局?

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70172
Samira Pourmirzaei Kouhbanani, Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan, Rana Fayazmilani
{"title":"增加运动时的脑力消耗是否会改变超重个体的底物氧化和心肺结局?","authors":"Samira Pourmirzaei Kouhbanani, Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan, Rana Fayazmilani","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the growing concern over the impact of brain health in individuals with overweight, understanding how mental exertion (ME) during exercise affects substrate oxidation and cardiorespiratory outcomes is crucial. This study examines how ME impacts these outcomes during an incremental exercise test in adults with overweight. Seventeen adults who were overweight completed an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer two times, with and without the Stroop task. Energy expenditure (EE), carbohydrate and fat oxidation, maximum heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2<sub>max</sub>), maximum fat oxidation (MFO), and the intensity of exercise that elicited MFO (Fat<sub>max</sub>) are measured by indirect calorimetry. ME did not change the EE, carbohydrate, and fat oxidation at any stages of the incremental test. However, ME resulted in significantly lower HR<sub>max</sub>, VO2<sub>max</sub>, and MFO (p < 0.01) and increased NASA-TLX scores but showed no change in Fat<sub>max</sub>. These results show ME decreases the value of HR<sub>max</sub>, VO2<sub>max</sub>, and MFO during the incremental exercise test. Due to the increased mental workload demonstrated by the NASA-TLX test, adults with overweight are unable to complete the test to the same extent as they did in the test without ME according to maximal levels in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 1","pages":"e70172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does mental exertion during incremental exercise change substrate oxidation and cardiorespiratory outcomes in individuals with overweight?\",\"authors\":\"Samira Pourmirzaei Kouhbanani, Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan, Rana Fayazmilani\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the growing concern over the impact of brain health in individuals with overweight, understanding how mental exertion (ME) during exercise affects substrate oxidation and cardiorespiratory outcomes is crucial. This study examines how ME impacts these outcomes during an incremental exercise test in adults with overweight. Seventeen adults who were overweight completed an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer two times, with and without the Stroop task. Energy expenditure (EE), carbohydrate and fat oxidation, maximum heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2<sub>max</sub>), maximum fat oxidation (MFO), and the intensity of exercise that elicited MFO (Fat<sub>max</sub>) are measured by indirect calorimetry. ME did not change the EE, carbohydrate, and fat oxidation at any stages of the incremental test. However, ME resulted in significantly lower HR<sub>max</sub>, VO2<sub>max</sub>, and MFO (p < 0.01) and increased NASA-TLX scores but showed no change in Fat<sub>max</sub>. These results show ME decreases the value of HR<sub>max</sub>, VO2<sub>max</sub>, and MFO during the incremental exercise test. Due to the increased mental workload demonstrated by the NASA-TLX test, adults with overweight are unable to complete the test to the same extent as they did in the test without ME according to maximal levels in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e70172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于人们越来越关注超重个体对大脑健康的影响,了解运动过程中的精神消耗(ME)如何影响底物氧化和心肺功能至关重要。本研究考察了在超重成人的增量运动试验中,ME如何影响这些结果。17名超重的成年人在自行车计力器上完成了两次增量运动测试,有和没有Stroop任务。通过间接量热法测量能量消耗(EE)、碳水化合物和脂肪氧化、最大心率(HRmax)、最大摄氧量(VO2max)、最大脂肪氧化(MFO)和引起MFO的运动强度(Fatmax)。在增量试验的任何阶段,代谢能都没有改变脂肪代谢、碳水化合物和脂肪氧化。然而,代谢能显著降低HRmax、VO2max和MFO (p max)。这些结果表明,在增量运动测试中,ME降低了HRmax、VO2max和MFO的值。由于NASA-TLX测试显示的脑力负荷增加,超重成人无法按照本研究的最大水平完成与无ME测试相同的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does mental exertion during incremental exercise change substrate oxidation and cardiorespiratory outcomes in individuals with overweight?

Given the growing concern over the impact of brain health in individuals with overweight, understanding how mental exertion (ME) during exercise affects substrate oxidation and cardiorespiratory outcomes is crucial. This study examines how ME impacts these outcomes during an incremental exercise test in adults with overweight. Seventeen adults who were overweight completed an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer two times, with and without the Stroop task. Energy expenditure (EE), carbohydrate and fat oxidation, maximum heart rate (HRmax), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), maximum fat oxidation (MFO), and the intensity of exercise that elicited MFO (Fatmax) are measured by indirect calorimetry. ME did not change the EE, carbohydrate, and fat oxidation at any stages of the incremental test. However, ME resulted in significantly lower HRmax, VO2max, and MFO (p < 0.01) and increased NASA-TLX scores but showed no change in Fatmax. These results show ME decreases the value of HRmax, VO2max, and MFO during the incremental exercise test. Due to the increased mental workload demonstrated by the NASA-TLX test, adults with overweight are unable to complete the test to the same extent as they did in the test without ME according to maximal levels in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the sex dependence of post-reperfusion cardiac mitochondrial function and redox balance in chronically stressed rats. Response of VO2max to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiac energy metabolism is decreased in male volunteers with prediabetes and does not normalize during the day. Examining discordance in spirometry reference equations: A retrospective study. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement in young healthy males.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1