益生菌治疗儿科患者食物过敏的系统评价和荟萃分析:2024年更新。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/pai.70028
Carol Stephanie C Tan-Lim, Natasha Ann R Esteban-Ipac
{"title":"益生菌治疗儿科患者食物过敏的系统评价和荟萃分析:2024年更新。","authors":"Carol Stephanie C Tan-Lim, Natasha Ann R Esteban-Ipac","doi":"10.1111/pai.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review updated the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of probiotics as treatment of food allergy among pediatric patients. We conducted a systematic search for all randomized controlled trials available until March 13, 2024 that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of probiotics for treating pediatric food allergy. Two authors independently conducted the search, screening, and data extraction. Data analysis and synthesis were done using Review Manager 5.4 software. We included 13 articles involving 1608 pediatric patients with food allergy. Probiotics probably has no effect on reducing eczema scores among infants with CMA (MD -1.29 points, 95% CI -4.14, 1.56; moderate certainty of evidence), based on two studies. Probiotics may reduce eczema scores for children with various types of allergy (MD -23.08 points, 95% CI -27.55, -18.61; low certainty of evidence), based on one study. It is uncertain whether probiotics may lead to tolerance acquisition among infants with CMA (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34, 1.00) due to very low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis based on time period showed significant benefit in inducing tolerance after at least 2 years (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29, 0.67; moderate certainty of evidence), suggesting a duration-dependent effect of probiotic usage. Subgroup analysis by probiotic preparation showed significant benefit for the LGG strain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62). Probiotics were generally well tolerated by the study participants. Further well-designed RCTs focusing on specific types of food allergy, as well as the use of standardized probiotic strains, outcome measurement, and longer follow-up periods are needed to draw clinically relevant conclusions on the role of probiotics in treating children with food allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19929,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 1","pages":"e70028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review and meta-analysis on probiotics as treatment for food allergies among pediatric patients: A 2024 update.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Stephanie C Tan-Lim, Natasha Ann R Esteban-Ipac\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pai.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review updated the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of probiotics as treatment of food allergy among pediatric patients. We conducted a systematic search for all randomized controlled trials available until March 13, 2024 that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of probiotics for treating pediatric food allergy. Two authors independently conducted the search, screening, and data extraction. Data analysis and synthesis were done using Review Manager 5.4 software. We included 13 articles involving 1608 pediatric patients with food allergy. Probiotics probably has no effect on reducing eczema scores among infants with CMA (MD -1.29 points, 95% CI -4.14, 1.56; moderate certainty of evidence), based on two studies. Probiotics may reduce eczema scores for children with various types of allergy (MD -23.08 points, 95% CI -27.55, -18.61; low certainty of evidence), based on one study. It is uncertain whether probiotics may lead to tolerance acquisition among infants with CMA (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34, 1.00) due to very low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis based on time period showed significant benefit in inducing tolerance after at least 2 years (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29, 0.67; moderate certainty of evidence), suggesting a duration-dependent effect of probiotic usage. Subgroup analysis by probiotic preparation showed significant benefit for the LGG strain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62). Probiotics were generally well tolerated by the study participants. Further well-designed RCTs focusing on specific types of food allergy, as well as the use of standardized probiotic strains, outcome measurement, and longer follow-up periods are needed to draw clinically relevant conclusions on the role of probiotics in treating children with food allergy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"e70028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述更新了关于益生菌治疗儿童食物过敏的有效性和安全性的现有证据。我们对截至2024年3月13日的所有随机对照试验进行了系统检索,这些试验评估了益生菌治疗儿童食物过敏的有效性和安全性。两位作者独立进行了搜索、筛选和数据提取。使用Review Manager 5.4软件进行数据分析和综合。我们纳入了13篇文章,涉及1608名儿童食物过敏患者。益生菌可能对降低CMA婴儿的湿疹评分没有作用(MD -1.29分,95% CI -4.14, 1.56;中度证据确定性),基于两项研究。益生菌可降低不同类型过敏儿童的湿疹评分(MD -23.08分,95% CI -27.55, -18.61;证据的低确定性),基于一项研究。由于证据的确定性非常低,尚不确定益生菌是否会导致CMA婴儿获得耐受性(RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34, 1.00)。基于时间段的亚组分析显示,至少2年后诱导耐受性有显著益处(RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29, 0.67;证据的中等确定性),表明益生菌的使用具有持续依赖的效果。亚组分析显示,益生菌制剂对LGG菌株有显著的益处(RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62)。研究参与者对益生菌的耐受性普遍良好。需要进一步设计良好的随机对照试验,关注特定类型的食物过敏,以及使用标准化的益生菌菌株,结果测量和更长的随访期,以得出益生菌在治疗儿童食物过敏中的作用的临床相关结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review and meta-analysis on probiotics as treatment for food allergies among pediatric patients: A 2024 update.

This systematic review updated the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of probiotics as treatment of food allergy among pediatric patients. We conducted a systematic search for all randomized controlled trials available until March 13, 2024 that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of probiotics for treating pediatric food allergy. Two authors independently conducted the search, screening, and data extraction. Data analysis and synthesis were done using Review Manager 5.4 software. We included 13 articles involving 1608 pediatric patients with food allergy. Probiotics probably has no effect on reducing eczema scores among infants with CMA (MD -1.29 points, 95% CI -4.14, 1.56; moderate certainty of evidence), based on two studies. Probiotics may reduce eczema scores for children with various types of allergy (MD -23.08 points, 95% CI -27.55, -18.61; low certainty of evidence), based on one study. It is uncertain whether probiotics may lead to tolerance acquisition among infants with CMA (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34, 1.00) due to very low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis based on time period showed significant benefit in inducing tolerance after at least 2 years (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29, 0.67; moderate certainty of evidence), suggesting a duration-dependent effect of probiotic usage. Subgroup analysis by probiotic preparation showed significant benefit for the LGG strain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62). Probiotics were generally well tolerated by the study participants. Further well-designed RCTs focusing on specific types of food allergy, as well as the use of standardized probiotic strains, outcome measurement, and longer follow-up periods are needed to draw clinically relevant conclusions on the role of probiotics in treating children with food allergy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Allergy and Immunology is the world''s leading journal in pediatric allergy, publishing original contributions and comprehensive reviews related to the understanding and treatment of immune deficiency and allergic inflammatory and infectious diseases in children. Other areas of interest include: development of specific and accessory immunity; the immunological interaction during pregnancy and lactation between mother and child. As Pediatric Allergy and Immunology promotes communication between scientists engaged in basic research and clinicians working with children, we publish both clinical and experimental work.
期刊最新文献
Comment on G. N. Vallianatou et al. Natural history of sesame allergy in pediatric patients: Insight from a retrospective analysis. Associations between maternal fish intake and polyunsaturated fatty acid status with childhood asthma in a high fish-eating population. Long-term outcomes of low-dose followed by conventional oral immunotherapy for egg allergy. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of childhood asthma by 10 years of age-Evidence from The Generation XXI birth cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1