针对晚期肺癌患者焦虑症的压力管理计划:干预适应性和利益相关者反馈。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.70048
Heather Derry-Vick, Amanda Khoudary, Osairys Billini, Holly G Prigerson, Marc D Schwartz, Jeffrey Cohen, Chance Griffin, Martin Gutierrez, Wendy G Lichtenthal, Lisa Carter-Bawa
{"title":"针对晚期肺癌患者焦虑症的压力管理计划:干预适应性和利益相关者反馈。","authors":"Heather Derry-Vick, Amanda Khoudary, Osairys Billini, Holly G Prigerson, Marc D Schwartz, Jeffrey Cohen, Chance Griffin, Martin Gutierrez, Wendy G Lichtenthal, Lisa Carter-Bawa","doi":"10.1002/pon.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although scanxiety is common and impactful for people with advanced lung cancer, few interventions address this psychosocial concern.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To create a stress management program for scanxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a structured intervention adaptation process guided by the ADAPT-ITT framework. We tailored materials from an existing evidence-based program, drafted additional modules, and obtained feedback on initial content. Following content revisions and website prototype development, 21 participants (patients with metastatic lung cancer, n = 8; family members, n = 3; clinicians, n = 10) reviewed the program. Participants rated the program's acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure; AIM), feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure; FIM), appropriateness (Appropriateness of Intervention Measure; IAM), helpfulness (module Likert ratings), and usability (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire; PSSUQ), and completed semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data revealed positive impressions of the program. Participants rated the program as acceptable (89%), feasible (89%), and appropriate (95%; proportion with average ratings ≥ 4 out of 5 on AIM, FIM, and IAM respectively). They rated 6 of the 7 modules as helpful, appropriate, and fitting with their experience (77%-100% with Likert ratings ≥ 4 out of 5); the below-threshold module (Introduction) was revised based on rapid qualitative analysis of interview data. Although 33% needed help to start using the website, its usability was rated highly after use (PSSUQ Mdn = 1.56, IQR = 1.11-1.82). The refined intervention is a largely self-guided program to enhance stress management skills using psychoeducation, recorded on-demand exercises, and 3 brief coaching calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This highly-rated intervention has the potential to alleviate scanxiety among people with advanced lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 1","pages":"e70048"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Management Program for Scanxiety in People With Advanced Lung Cancer: Intervention Adaptation and Stakeholder Feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Derry-Vick, Amanda Khoudary, Osairys Billini, Holly G Prigerson, Marc D Schwartz, Jeffrey Cohen, Chance Griffin, Martin Gutierrez, Wendy G Lichtenthal, Lisa Carter-Bawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although scanxiety is common and impactful for people with advanced lung cancer, few interventions address this psychosocial concern.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To create a stress management program for scanxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a structured intervention adaptation process guided by the ADAPT-ITT framework. We tailored materials from an existing evidence-based program, drafted additional modules, and obtained feedback on initial content. Following content revisions and website prototype development, 21 participants (patients with metastatic lung cancer, n = 8; family members, n = 3; clinicians, n = 10) reviewed the program. Participants rated the program's acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure; AIM), feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure; FIM), appropriateness (Appropriateness of Intervention Measure; IAM), helpfulness (module Likert ratings), and usability (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire; PSSUQ), and completed semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data revealed positive impressions of the program. Participants rated the program as acceptable (89%), feasible (89%), and appropriate (95%; proportion with average ratings ≥ 4 out of 5 on AIM, FIM, and IAM respectively). They rated 6 of the 7 modules as helpful, appropriate, and fitting with their experience (77%-100% with Likert ratings ≥ 4 out of 5); the below-threshold module (Introduction) was revised based on rapid qualitative analysis of interview data. Although 33% needed help to start using the website, its usability was rated highly after use (PSSUQ Mdn = 1.56, IQR = 1.11-1.82). The refined intervention is a largely self-guided program to enhance stress management skills using psychoeducation, recorded on-demand exercises, and 3 brief coaching calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This highly-rated intervention has the potential to alleviate scanxiety among people with advanced lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"e70048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然扫描焦虑对晚期肺癌患者很常见且有影响,但很少有干预措施解决这种心理社会问题。目的:建立一个针对焦虑的压力管理程序。方法:在ADAPT-ITT框架的指导下,我们进行了结构化的干预适应过程。我们从现有的循证课程中定制材料,起草附加模块,并获得对初始内容的反馈。经过内容修改和网站原型开发,21名参与者(转移性肺癌患者,n = 8;家庭成员,n = 3;临床医生回顾了这个项目。参与者对项目的可接受性(干预措施的可接受性;AIM)、可行性(干预措施的可行性;FIM),适当性(干预措施的适当性;有用性(模块李克特评分)和可用性(学习后系统可用性问卷;PSSUQ),并完成半结构化访谈。结果:数据显示了该计划的积极印象。参与者对该计划的评价为可接受(89%)、可行(89%)和适当(95%;在AIM、FIM和IAM的平均评分≥4分(满分5分)的比例)。他们将7个模块中的6个评为有帮助、适当和符合他们的经验(77%-100%李克特评分≥4分);基于对访谈数据的快速定性分析,对阈值以下模块(绪论)进行了修订。虽然33%的人需要帮助才能开始使用该网站,但使用后该网站的可用性评价很高(PSSUQ Mdn = 1.56, IQR = 1.11-1.82)。精细化的干预是一个很大程度上自我指导的项目,通过心理教育、录制点播练习和3个简短的辅导电话来提高压力管理技能。结论:这种高度评价的干预措施有可能缓解晚期肺癌患者的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stress Management Program for Scanxiety in People With Advanced Lung Cancer: Intervention Adaptation and Stakeholder Feedback.

Background: Although scanxiety is common and impactful for people with advanced lung cancer, few interventions address this psychosocial concern.

Aims: To create a stress management program for scanxiety.

Methods: We conducted a structured intervention adaptation process guided by the ADAPT-ITT framework. We tailored materials from an existing evidence-based program, drafted additional modules, and obtained feedback on initial content. Following content revisions and website prototype development, 21 participants (patients with metastatic lung cancer, n = 8; family members, n = 3; clinicians, n = 10) reviewed the program. Participants rated the program's acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure; AIM), feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure; FIM), appropriateness (Appropriateness of Intervention Measure; IAM), helpfulness (module Likert ratings), and usability (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire; PSSUQ), and completed semi-structured interviews.

Results: Data revealed positive impressions of the program. Participants rated the program as acceptable (89%), feasible (89%), and appropriate (95%; proportion with average ratings ≥ 4 out of 5 on AIM, FIM, and IAM respectively). They rated 6 of the 7 modules as helpful, appropriate, and fitting with their experience (77%-100% with Likert ratings ≥ 4 out of 5); the below-threshold module (Introduction) was revised based on rapid qualitative analysis of interview data. Although 33% needed help to start using the website, its usability was rated highly after use (PSSUQ Mdn = 1.56, IQR = 1.11-1.82). The refined intervention is a largely self-guided program to enhance stress management skills using psychoeducation, recorded on-demand exercises, and 3 brief coaching calls.

Conclusions: This highly-rated intervention has the potential to alleviate scanxiety among people with advanced lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
期刊最新文献
Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors' Experience of Social Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Psychosocial Correlates of Death Anxiety in Advanced Cancer: A Scoping Review. Connections After Cancer: Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors' Perspectives on Forming New Friendships After Cancer. Systematic Review of Pain Assessment Measures Used in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Systematic Review of Cancer-Related Trauma and Growth in Caregivers Across the Lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1