在模拟工作日中,用间歇性站立代替长时间坐着对随后晚上睡眠的影响。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep and Biological Rhythms Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x
Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs
{"title":"在模拟工作日中,用间歇性站立代替长时间坐着对随后晚上睡眠的影响。","authors":"Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs","doi":"10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired <i>t</i>-tests and Hedges' <i>g</i> effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; <i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>g</i> = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21896,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","volume":"23 1","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of replacing prolonged sitting with intermittent standing during a simulated workday on the subsequent night's sleep.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired <i>t</i>-tests and Hedges' <i>g</i> effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; <i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>g</i> = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"67-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717747/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在闲暇时间进行一次体育锻炼可以改善第二天晚上的睡眠。然而,打破工作日久坐的时间是否能改善睡眠还不得而知。这项研究的目的是为了检验在工作时间站着是否能改善第二天晚上的睡眠。25名不运动的成年人(16名男性,42.4±11.8岁,体重指数:31.9±5.0 kg/m2)参加了一项随机交叉试验,该试验包括两个模拟8小时工作日,包括长时间坐着(SIT)或每30分钟交替坐立(SIT- stand)。在每个工作日之后的晚上对睡眠进行评估。参与者完成一份日记,并佩戴手腕加速计(Actiwatch Spectrum)来评估睡眠的多个维度(如时间、持续时间、清醒程度和质量)。配对t检验和赫奇斯效应量评估了不同条件下睡眠的差异。与SIT相比,SIT- stand后自我报告的睡眠后觉醒(WASO)显著降低(13.9±30.1 min vs. 23.2±38.6 min;p = 0.03, g = - 0.51),与SIT- stand相比,SIT- stand后加速度计评估的WASO小幅无显著降低(32.7±13.6 min vs 40.8±25.8 min;P = 0.06, g = - 0.38)。与SIT相比,SIT- stand后睡眠期间基于加速度计的平均活动水平也较低(10.8±14.5 vs 14.7±10.4计数/分钟;P = 0.03, g = - 0.47)。其他睡眠结果(例如,卧床和醒着的时间、总睡眠时间、睡眠开始潜伏期)在两种情况下没有差异。在模拟工作日中,交替坐着和站立而不是长时间坐着适度地减少了夜间清醒。长期减少工作场所久坐行为是否也会带来类似的好处,值得进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of replacing prolonged sitting with intermittent standing during a simulated workday on the subsequent night's sleep.

A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired t-tests and Hedges' g effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; p = 0.03, g = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; p = 0.06, g = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; p = 0.03, g = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Biological Rhythms
Sleep and Biological Rhythms 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sleep and Biological Rhythms is a quarterly peer-reviewed publication dealing with medical treatments relating to sleep. The journal publishies original articles, short papers, commentaries and the occasional reviews. In scope the journal covers mechanisms of sleep and wakefullness from the ranging perspectives of basic science, medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, public health and related branches of the social sciences
期刊最新文献
Association between sleep duration and mortality in cancer patients. The clinical implications of the comorbidity between restless legs syndrome and migraines. Association between hypoxemia and quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing. Correction: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of modified Freedman questionnaire for sleep quality. Association between daytime sleepiness and quality of life in outpatients with schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1