Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs
{"title":"在模拟工作日中,用间歇性站立代替长时间坐着对随后晚上睡眠的影响。","authors":"Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs","doi":"10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired <i>t</i>-tests and Hedges' <i>g</i> effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; <i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>g</i> = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21896,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","volume":"23 1","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of replacing prolonged sitting with intermittent standing during a simulated workday on the subsequent night's sleep.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher E Kline, Andrew G Kubala, Robert J Kowalsky, Bethany Barone Gibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired <i>t</i>-tests and Hedges' <i>g</i> effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; <i>p</i> = 0.06, <i>g</i> = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; <i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>g</i> = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"67-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717747/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Biological Rhythms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-024-00552-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在闲暇时间进行一次体育锻炼可以改善第二天晚上的睡眠。然而,打破工作日久坐的时间是否能改善睡眠还不得而知。这项研究的目的是为了检验在工作时间站着是否能改善第二天晚上的睡眠。25名不运动的成年人(16名男性,42.4±11.8岁,体重指数:31.9±5.0 kg/m2)参加了一项随机交叉试验,该试验包括两个模拟8小时工作日,包括长时间坐着(SIT)或每30分钟交替坐立(SIT- stand)。在每个工作日之后的晚上对睡眠进行评估。参与者完成一份日记,并佩戴手腕加速计(Actiwatch Spectrum)来评估睡眠的多个维度(如时间、持续时间、清醒程度和质量)。配对t检验和赫奇斯效应量评估了不同条件下睡眠的差异。与SIT相比,SIT- stand后自我报告的睡眠后觉醒(WASO)显著降低(13.9±30.1 min vs. 23.2±38.6 min;p = 0.03, g = - 0.51),与SIT- stand相比,SIT- stand后加速度计评估的WASO小幅无显著降低(32.7±13.6 min vs 40.8±25.8 min;P = 0.06, g = - 0.38)。与SIT相比,SIT- stand后睡眠期间基于加速度计的平均活动水平也较低(10.8±14.5 vs 14.7±10.4计数/分钟;P = 0.03, g = - 0.47)。其他睡眠结果(例如,卧床和醒着的时间、总睡眠时间、睡眠开始潜伏期)在两种情况下没有差异。在模拟工作日中,交替坐着和站立而不是长时间坐着适度地减少了夜间清醒。长期减少工作场所久坐行为是否也会带来类似的好处,值得进一步探索。
The effect of replacing prolonged sitting with intermittent standing during a simulated workday on the subsequent night's sleep.
A bout of leisure-time physical activity improves sleep on the subsequent night. However, whether breaking up sedentary time during the workday improves sleep is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether breaking up prolonged sitting by standing during the workday leads to better sleep the following night. 25 inactive adults (16 males, 42.4 ± 11.8 years, body mass index: 31.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) participated in a randomized crossover trial consisting of two simulated 8-h workdays involving prolonged sitting (SIT) or alternating sitting and standing every 30 min (SIT-STAND). Sleep was assessed on the night following each workday. Participants completed a diary and wore a wrist accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum) to assess multiple dimensions of sleep (e.g., timing, duration, wakefulness, quality). Paired t-tests and Hedges' g effect sizes evaluated differences in sleep across conditions. Self-reported wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was significantly lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (13.9 ± 30.1 min vs. 23.2 ± 38.6 min; p = 0.03, g = - 0.51), mirrored by a small-sized nonsignificant reduction in accelerometer-assessed WASO following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (32.7 ± 13.6 min vs. 40.8 ± 25.8 min; p = 0.06, g = - 0.38). Mean accelerometer-based activity levels during sleep were also lower following SIT-STAND compared to SIT (10.8 ± 14.5 vs. 14.7 ± 10.4 counts/min; p = 0.03, g = - 0.47). Other sleep outcomes (e.g., bed- and wake-time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency) were not different between conditions. Alternating sitting and standing rather than prolonged sitting during a simulated workday modestly reduces night-time wakefulness. Whether similar benefits occur with long-term reduction in workplace sedentary behavior deserves further exploration.
期刊介绍:
Sleep and Biological Rhythms is a quarterly peer-reviewed publication dealing with medical treatments relating to sleep. The journal publishies original articles, short papers, commentaries and the occasional reviews. In scope the journal covers mechanisms of sleep and wakefullness from the ranging perspectives of basic science, medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, public health and related branches of the social sciences