Philip J Norris, Mars Stone, Clara Di Germanio, Brendan Balasko, Zhanna Kaidarova, Henry Friend, Jeanne Varrone, Laurence Corash, Nina Mufti, Richard J Benjamin
{"title":"人类白细胞抗原同种免疫在复杂心脏手术患者阿莫司林/谷胱甘肽病原体减少红细胞的随机试验。","authors":"Philip J Norris, Mars Stone, Clara Di Germanio, Brendan Balasko, Zhanna Kaidarova, Henry Friend, Jeanne Varrone, Laurence Corash, Nina Mufti, Richard J Benjamin","doi":"10.1111/trf.18131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although alloimmunization risk of pathogen-reduced (PR) platelets has been studied, the risk has not been reported with PR red blood cells (RBCs).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In a Phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation), cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery patients were randomized to transfusion with amustaline/glutathione PR versus conventional RBCs. Pre-transfusion and Day 28 samples were evaluated for Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I and Class II antibodies at low, medium, and high cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HLA alloimmunization analysis included 114 participants (53% female) in the PR and 113 (51% female) in the conventional RBC arms. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, 13.7% (N = 29) and 7.2% (N = 15) developed new high-level HLA Class I or Class II antibodies, respectively; however, there was no signal that PR-RBCs affected the rate of HLA Class I (odds ratio (OR) 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-2.9]) or Class II antibody formation (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.35-2.8]). Female transfusion recipients had higher risk of developing new high-level HLA Class I antibodies (OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.5-40.9]) and Class II antibodies (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.4-17]). The mean number of RBC (5.5 vs. 3.6 units, p = 0.018) and platelet (1.8 vs. 1.1 units, p = 0.043) transfusions was higher in subjects with new high-level HLA Class II antibodies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Receipt of amustaline/glutathione PR-RBC units did not affect HLA alloimmunization risk. Female sex and number of RBC and platelet transfusions were risk factors for the development of new high-level HLA Class I and Class II antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human leukocyte antigen alloimmunization in a randomized trial of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced red cells in complex cardiac surgery patients.\",\"authors\":\"Philip J Norris, Mars Stone, Clara Di Germanio, Brendan Balasko, Zhanna Kaidarova, Henry Friend, Jeanne Varrone, Laurence Corash, Nina Mufti, Richard J Benjamin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although alloimmunization risk of pathogen-reduced (PR) platelets has been studied, the risk has not been reported with PR red blood cells (RBCs).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In a Phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation), cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery patients were randomized to transfusion with amustaline/glutathione PR versus conventional RBCs. Pre-transfusion and Day 28 samples were evaluated for Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I and Class II antibodies at low, medium, and high cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HLA alloimmunization analysis included 114 participants (53% female) in the PR and 113 (51% female) in the conventional RBC arms. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, 13.7% (N = 29) and 7.2% (N = 15) developed new high-level HLA Class I or Class II antibodies, respectively; however, there was no signal that PR-RBCs affected the rate of HLA Class I (odds ratio (OR) 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-2.9]) or Class II antibody formation (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.35-2.8]). Female transfusion recipients had higher risk of developing new high-level HLA Class I antibodies (OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.5-40.9]) and Class II antibodies (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.4-17]). The mean number of RBC (5.5 vs. 3.6 units, p = 0.018) and platelet (1.8 vs. 1.1 units, p = 0.043) transfusions was higher in subjects with new high-level HLA Class II antibodies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Receipt of amustaline/glutathione PR-RBC units did not affect HLA alloimmunization risk. Female sex and number of RBC and platelet transfusions were risk factors for the development of new high-level HLA Class I and Class II antibodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human leukocyte antigen alloimmunization in a randomized trial of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced red cells in complex cardiac surgery patients.
Background: Although alloimmunization risk of pathogen-reduced (PR) platelets has been studied, the risk has not been reported with PR red blood cells (RBCs).
Study design and methods: In a Phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation), cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery patients were randomized to transfusion with amustaline/glutathione PR versus conventional RBCs. Pre-transfusion and Day 28 samples were evaluated for Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I and Class II antibodies at low, medium, and high cutoff values.
Results: The HLA alloimmunization analysis included 114 participants (53% female) in the PR and 113 (51% female) in the conventional RBC arms. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, 13.7% (N = 29) and 7.2% (N = 15) developed new high-level HLA Class I or Class II antibodies, respectively; however, there was no signal that PR-RBCs affected the rate of HLA Class I (odds ratio (OR) 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-2.9]) or Class II antibody formation (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.35-2.8]). Female transfusion recipients had higher risk of developing new high-level HLA Class I antibodies (OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.5-40.9]) and Class II antibodies (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.4-17]). The mean number of RBC (5.5 vs. 3.6 units, p = 0.018) and platelet (1.8 vs. 1.1 units, p = 0.043) transfusions was higher in subjects with new high-level HLA Class II antibodies.
Discussion: Receipt of amustaline/glutathione PR-RBC units did not affect HLA alloimmunization risk. Female sex and number of RBC and platelet transfusions were risk factors for the development of new high-level HLA Class I and Class II antibodies.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.