小肿瘤大小对T3N1结肠癌预后的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12480
Koki Tamai, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Naoto Tsujimura, Kentaro Nishida, Soichiro Mori, Yukihiro Yoshikawa, Masatoshi Nomura, Takuya Hamakawa, Daisuke Takiuchi, Masanori Tsujie, Yusuke Akamaru
{"title":"小肿瘤大小对T3N1结肠癌预后的影响。","authors":"Koki Tamai, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Naoto Tsujimura, Kentaro Nishida, Soichiro Mori, Yukihiro Yoshikawa, Masatoshi Nomura, Takuya Hamakawa, Daisuke Takiuchi, Masanori Tsujie, Yusuke Akamaru","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, large tumor size is associated with poor survival in colon cancer, but its impact remains limited and controversial. Recently, the impact of small tumor size on prognosis has gained attention. This study aimed to investigate whether small tumor size can be an additional parameter for T3N1 colon cancer prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with pT3N1 colon cancer between 2010 and 2021. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was calculated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We evaluated survival through the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk of prognosis through multivariate Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was 45 mm. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in tumor size < 45 mm than in ≥ 45 mm (25.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.037). Tumor size < 45 mm also had lower overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) than its counterpart (p = 0.03 for all). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 70 years, undifferentiated histological type, and tumor size < 45 mm were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.025, p = 0.001, p < 0.04, respectively), whereas tumor size < 45 mm was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (p = 0.043). Meanwhile, the independent prognostic factors for CSS were undifferentiated histological type and tumor size < 45 mm (p = 0.008 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small tumor size is associated with poor prognosis in pT3N1 colon cancer cases. Thus, small tumors potentially have biologically aggressive features.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Small Tumor Size on Prognosis in T3N1 Colon Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Koki Tamai, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Naoto Tsujimura, Kentaro Nishida, Soichiro Mori, Yukihiro Yoshikawa, Masatoshi Nomura, Takuya Hamakawa, Daisuke Takiuchi, Masanori Tsujie, Yusuke Akamaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.12480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, large tumor size is associated with poor survival in colon cancer, but its impact remains limited and controversial. Recently, the impact of small tumor size on prognosis has gained attention. This study aimed to investigate whether small tumor size can be an additional parameter for T3N1 colon cancer prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with pT3N1 colon cancer between 2010 and 2021. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was calculated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We evaluated survival through the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk of prognosis through multivariate Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was 45 mm. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in tumor size < 45 mm than in ≥ 45 mm (25.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.037). Tumor size < 45 mm also had lower overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) than its counterpart (p = 0.03 for all). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 70 years, undifferentiated histological type, and tumor size < 45 mm were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.025, p = 0.001, p < 0.04, respectively), whereas tumor size < 45 mm was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (p = 0.043). Meanwhile, the independent prognostic factors for CSS were undifferentiated histological type and tumor size < 45 mm (p = 0.008 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small tumor size is associated with poor prognosis in pT3N1 colon cancer cases. Thus, small tumors potentially have biologically aggressive features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"343-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统上,大肿瘤与结肠癌的低生存率相关,但其影响仍然有限且存在争议。近年来,小肿瘤对预后的影响已引起人们的关注。本研究旨在探讨小肿瘤大小是否可以作为T3N1结肠癌预后的附加参数。方法:我们回顾性分析了2010年至2021年间连续162例pT3N1结肠癌患者。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析,计算出肿瘤大小的最佳截断值。我们通过Kaplan-Meier法评估生存率,通过多变量Cox模型评估预后风险。结果:肿瘤大小最佳临界值为45mm。肿瘤大小< 45 mm组复发率明显高于≥45 mm组(25.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.037)。肿瘤大小< 45 mm的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)也低于对照组(p = 0.03)。在多因素分析中,年龄≥70岁、未分化组织学类型、肿瘤大小< 45 mm是影响OS的独立预后因素(p = 0.025, p = 0.001, p)。结论:pT3N1结肠癌患者肿瘤小与预后不良相关。因此,小肿瘤具有潜在的生物学侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Small Tumor Size on Prognosis in T3N1 Colon Cancer.

Background: Traditionally, large tumor size is associated with poor survival in colon cancer, but its impact remains limited and controversial. Recently, the impact of small tumor size on prognosis has gained attention. This study aimed to investigate whether small tumor size can be an additional parameter for T3N1 colon cancer prognosis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with pT3N1 colon cancer between 2010 and 2021. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was calculated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We evaluated survival through the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk of prognosis through multivariate Cox models.

Results: The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was 45 mm. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in tumor size < 45 mm than in ≥ 45 mm (25.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.037). Tumor size < 45 mm also had lower overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) than its counterpart (p = 0.03 for all). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 70 years, undifferentiated histological type, and tumor size < 45 mm were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.025, p = 0.001, p < 0.04, respectively), whereas tumor size < 45 mm was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (p = 0.043). Meanwhile, the independent prognostic factors for CSS were undifferentiated histological type and tumor size < 45 mm (p = 0.008 for both).

Conclusions: Small tumor size is associated with poor prognosis in pT3N1 colon cancer cases. Thus, small tumors potentially have biologically aggressive features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Intersectoral Collaboration Between Traditional Bonesetters and Formal Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Past Initiatives and Stakeholder Perspectives. Investigating the Effects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Its Relationship With Smoking. Correction to: Enhancing Trauma Care Through Innovative Trauma and Disaster Team Response Training: A Blended Learning Approach in Tanzania. Osebo C, Razek T, Deckelbaum D, et al. World J Surg. 2024;7:1616-1625. Evidence-Based Medicine Within Surgical Practice and Training: A Scoping Review. Vascular Imaging is the Only Reliable Method to Exclude Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Post Hanging or Strangulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1