使用步行带和地板升降机的病人转移任务的综合风险评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2025.2450007
Mitchelle J J Law, Zaidi Mohd Ripin, Intan Juliana Abd Hamid, Kim Sooi Law, Jeevinthiran Karunagaran, Nur Shuhaidatul Sarmiza Abdul Halim, Mohamad Ikhwan Zaini Ridzwan
{"title":"使用步行带和地板升降机的病人转移任务的综合风险评估。","authors":"Mitchelle J J Law, Zaidi Mohd Ripin, Intan Juliana Abd Hamid, Kim Sooi Law, Jeevinthiran Karunagaran, Nur Shuhaidatul Sarmiza Abdul Halim, Mohamad Ikhwan Zaini Ridzwan","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2450007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) during bed-to-wheelchair and wheelchair-to-commode transfers are a significant concern, yet prior assessments often focused on specific subtasks, overlooking potential cumulative risks.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study employed Xsens Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and force plates integrated with an automated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) system to provide a continuous and comprehensive evaluation of WMSDs risks associated with the use of a walking belt and a floor lift.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The continuous assessment revealed peak REBA scores ranging from 8.81 to 9.19, categorizing tasks such as applying the sling, repositioning the patient from supine to sitting, and adjusting the wheelchair footrest as high-risk. During bed-to-wheelchair transfers, the floor lift significantly reduced the mean peak REBA score by 1.73 points (95% CI [1.23, 2.24], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the mean vertical force by 14.68 N (95% CI [10.15, 19.22], <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the walking belt.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the value of a continuous risk assessment approach in identifying high-risk tasks and informing targeted ergonomic interventions. The results underscore the need for optimizing patient handling practices and developing advanced assistive devices to enhance caregiver safety and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive risk assessment of the patient transfer task using the walking belt and floor lift.\",\"authors\":\"Mitchelle J J Law, Zaidi Mohd Ripin, Intan Juliana Abd Hamid, Kim Sooi Law, Jeevinthiran Karunagaran, Nur Shuhaidatul Sarmiza Abdul Halim, Mohamad Ikhwan Zaini Ridzwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2450007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) during bed-to-wheelchair and wheelchair-to-commode transfers are a significant concern, yet prior assessments often focused on specific subtasks, overlooking potential cumulative risks.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study employed Xsens Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and force plates integrated with an automated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) system to provide a continuous and comprehensive evaluation of WMSDs risks associated with the use of a walking belt and a floor lift.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The continuous assessment revealed peak REBA scores ranging from 8.81 to 9.19, categorizing tasks such as applying the sling, repositioning the patient from supine to sitting, and adjusting the wheelchair footrest as high-risk. During bed-to-wheelchair transfers, the floor lift significantly reduced the mean peak REBA score by 1.73 points (95% CI [1.23, 2.24], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the mean vertical force by 14.68 N (95% CI [10.15, 19.22], <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the walking belt.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the value of a continuous risk assessment approach in identifying high-risk tasks and informing targeted ergonomic interventions. The results underscore the need for optimizing patient handling practices and developing advanced assistive devices to enhance caregiver safety and efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2450007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2450007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在从床到轮椅和从轮椅到厕所的转移过程中,与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)是一个值得关注的问题,但之前的评估往往侧重于特定的子任务,忽视了潜在的累积风险。方法:本研究采用Xsens惯性测量单元(imu)和力板与自动快速全身评估(REBA)系统相结合,对使用步行带和地板升降机相关的WMSDs风险进行持续和全面的评估。结果:连续评估显示REBA评分峰值在8.81 ~ 9.19之间,将使用吊带、将患者从仰卧位调整为坐位、调整轮椅脚凳等任务归类为高危任务。在从床到轮椅的转移过程中,地板升降显著降低了平均峰值REBA评分1.73分(95% CI [1.23, 2.24], p)。结论:这些发现强调了持续风险评估方法在识别高风险任务和告知有针对性的人体工程学干预方面的价值。结果强调需要优化病人处理做法和开发先进的辅助设备,以提高护理人员的安全和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive risk assessment of the patient transfer task using the walking belt and floor lift.

Purpose: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) during bed-to-wheelchair and wheelchair-to-commode transfers are a significant concern, yet prior assessments often focused on specific subtasks, overlooking potential cumulative risks.

Methods: This study employed Xsens Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and force plates integrated with an automated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) system to provide a continuous and comprehensive evaluation of WMSDs risks associated with the use of a walking belt and a floor lift.

Results: The continuous assessment revealed peak REBA scores ranging from 8.81 to 9.19, categorizing tasks such as applying the sling, repositioning the patient from supine to sitting, and adjusting the wheelchair footrest as high-risk. During bed-to-wheelchair transfers, the floor lift significantly reduced the mean peak REBA score by 1.73 points (95% CI [1.23, 2.24], p < 0.001) and the mean vertical force by 14.68 N (95% CI [10.15, 19.22], p < 0.001) compared to the walking belt.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of a continuous risk assessment approach in identifying high-risk tasks and informing targeted ergonomic interventions. The results underscore the need for optimizing patient handling practices and developing advanced assistive devices to enhance caregiver safety and efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Evidence to inform seat height and seat angle configuration for bilateral foot propulsion. Inclusive waste separation: co-designed bins empowering visually impaired individuals. Characteristics of factors affecting axle load and friction forces in a wheelchair. Tools and devices for telerehabilitation in pediatric and adult cystic fibrosis patients: a scoping review. Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1