抑制去甲肾上腺素能以降低插管后的脑电唤醒:随机安慰剂对照试验。

Kaitlin Kramer , Thomas Payne , Mitchell Brooks , Jessica Barry , Neha Mahajan , Samantha Malcolm , Hannah Braithwaite , Alex Wang , Chris Thompson , Keith Liyanagama , Robert D. Sanders
{"title":"抑制去甲肾上腺素能以降低插管后的脑电唤醒:随机安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Kaitlin Kramer ,&nbsp;Thomas Payne ,&nbsp;Mitchell Brooks ,&nbsp;Jessica Barry ,&nbsp;Neha Mahajan ,&nbsp;Samantha Malcolm ,&nbsp;Hannah Braithwaite ,&nbsp;Alex Wang ,&nbsp;Chris Thompson ,&nbsp;Keith Liyanagama ,&nbsp;Robert D. Sanders","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intraoperative awareness, without explicit recall, occurs after induction of anaesthesia in approximately 10% of persons under 40 yr of age. Most anaesthetic agents minimally suppress the noradrenergic system. We hypothesised that addition of dexmedetomidine, which suppresses noradrenergic activity, may reduce encephalographic (EEG) arousal in response to tracheal intubation; such an effect would lay the foundation for future studies of dexmedetomidine in reducing intraoperative awareness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-site randomised, placebo-controlled trial with sex-based stratification was conducted. Participants, aged 18–40 yr old, undergoing intubation for general anaesthesia were eligible for recruitment and randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine or placebo. Dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg<sup>−1</sup>) was given as a 5-min loading dose before induction. Bispectral index (BIS) values were collected during the induction phase of anaesthesia and the isolated forearm technique was used to assess patients' responsiveness before and after tracheal intubation. The primary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS from pre-to postintubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 51 patients were recruited and included in the primary analysis. We did not observe an effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS after tracheal intubation (mean difference –1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] –4.87 to 2.62; <em>p</em>=0.556). Dexmedetomidine reduced the estimated plasma propofol concentration at loss of responsiveness (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.06 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI –1.66 to –0.46; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and before intubation (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.84 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI –2.79 to –0.90; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). There was one patient in the placebo group who gave positive responses in the isolated forearm test before and after tracheal intubation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dexmedetomidine demonstrated an anaesthetic-sparing effect at induction of anaesthesia but did not prevent EEG arousal after tracheal intubation, as defined by an increase in the BIS value.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><div>Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12622000754741).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noradrenergic suppression to reduce electroencephalographic arousal after intubation: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Kramer ,&nbsp;Thomas Payne ,&nbsp;Mitchell Brooks ,&nbsp;Jessica Barry ,&nbsp;Neha Mahajan ,&nbsp;Samantha Malcolm ,&nbsp;Hannah Braithwaite ,&nbsp;Alex Wang ,&nbsp;Chris Thompson ,&nbsp;Keith Liyanagama ,&nbsp;Robert D. Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intraoperative awareness, without explicit recall, occurs after induction of anaesthesia in approximately 10% of persons under 40 yr of age. Most anaesthetic agents minimally suppress the noradrenergic system. We hypothesised that addition of dexmedetomidine, which suppresses noradrenergic activity, may reduce encephalographic (EEG) arousal in response to tracheal intubation; such an effect would lay the foundation for future studies of dexmedetomidine in reducing intraoperative awareness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-site randomised, placebo-controlled trial with sex-based stratification was conducted. Participants, aged 18–40 yr old, undergoing intubation for general anaesthesia were eligible for recruitment and randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine or placebo. Dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg<sup>−1</sup>) was given as a 5-min loading dose before induction. Bispectral index (BIS) values were collected during the induction phase of anaesthesia and the isolated forearm technique was used to assess patients' responsiveness before and after tracheal intubation. The primary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS from pre-to postintubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 51 patients were recruited and included in the primary analysis. We did not observe an effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS after tracheal intubation (mean difference –1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] –4.87 to 2.62; <em>p</em>=0.556). Dexmedetomidine reduced the estimated plasma propofol concentration at loss of responsiveness (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.06 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI –1.66 to –0.46; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and before intubation (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.84 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI –2.79 to –0.90; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). There was one patient in the placebo group who gave positive responses in the isolated forearm test before and after tracheal intubation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dexmedetomidine demonstrated an anaesthetic-sparing effect at induction of anaesthesia but did not prevent EEG arousal after tracheal intubation, as defined by an increase in the BIS value.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><div>Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12622000754741).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711814/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 40 岁以下的人群中,约有 10% 的人在麻醉诱导后会出现术中意识,但没有明确的回忆。大多数麻醉剂对去甲肾上腺素能系统的抑制作用微乎其微。我们假设,加入右美托咪定可抑制去甲肾上腺素能活性,从而降低气管插管时的脑电图(EEG)唤醒;这种效果将为今后研究右美托咪定降低术中意识奠定基础:方法:进行了一项基于性别分层的单点随机安慰剂对照试验。年龄在18-40岁之间、接受插管全身麻醉的参与者均符合招募条件,并被随机分配接受右美托咪定或安慰剂。右美托咪定(0.5 μg kg-1)在诱导前 5 分钟以负荷剂量给药。在麻醉诱导阶段收集双谱指数(BIS)值,并在气管插管前后使用孤立前臂技术评估患者的反应性。主要结果是右美托咪定对插管前到插管后 BIS 变化的影响:共招募了 51 名患者并纳入主要分析。我们没有观察到右美托咪定对气管插管后 BIS 变化的影响(平均差-1.13,95% 置信区间 [CI] -4.87 至 2.62;P=0.556)。右美托咪定降低了失去响应时的估计血浆异丙酚浓度(差异[右美托咪定-安慰剂]:-1.06 μg ml-1,95% CI -1.66 至 -0.46;p-1,95% CI -2.79 至 -0.90;p结论:右美托咪定在麻醉诱导时显示出了节省麻醉剂的效果,但并不能防止气管插管后的脑电图唤醒,脑电图唤醒的定义是BIS值的增加:临床试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(试验编号:ACTRN12622000754741)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noradrenergic suppression to reduce electroencephalographic arousal after intubation: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Background

Intraoperative awareness, without explicit recall, occurs after induction of anaesthesia in approximately 10% of persons under 40 yr of age. Most anaesthetic agents minimally suppress the noradrenergic system. We hypothesised that addition of dexmedetomidine, which suppresses noradrenergic activity, may reduce encephalographic (EEG) arousal in response to tracheal intubation; such an effect would lay the foundation for future studies of dexmedetomidine in reducing intraoperative awareness.

Methods

A single-site randomised, placebo-controlled trial with sex-based stratification was conducted. Participants, aged 18–40 yr old, undergoing intubation for general anaesthesia were eligible for recruitment and randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine or placebo. Dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg−1) was given as a 5-min loading dose before induction. Bispectral index (BIS) values were collected during the induction phase of anaesthesia and the isolated forearm technique was used to assess patients' responsiveness before and after tracheal intubation. The primary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS from pre-to postintubation.

Results

A total of 51 patients were recruited and included in the primary analysis. We did not observe an effect of dexmedetomidine on changes in BIS after tracheal intubation (mean difference –1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] –4.87 to 2.62; p=0.556). Dexmedetomidine reduced the estimated plasma propofol concentration at loss of responsiveness (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.06 μg ml−1, 95% CI –1.66 to –0.46; p<0.001) and before intubation (difference [dexmedetomidine – placebo]: –1.84 μg ml−1, 95% CI –2.79 to –0.90; p<0.001). There was one patient in the placebo group who gave positive responses in the isolated forearm test before and after tracheal intubation.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine demonstrated an anaesthetic-sparing effect at induction of anaesthesia but did not prevent EEG arousal after tracheal intubation, as defined by an increase in the BIS value.

Clinical Trial Registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12622000754741).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implanted port catheters in patients with breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PICCPORT randomised controlled trial Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial) The concerted actions of microRNA-29a and interferon-β modulate complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain by regulating the expression of type 1 interferon receptor, interferon-stimulated gene 15, and p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1