肌侵性膀胱癌经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除加全身化疗后膀胱保留策略实现无创降期的可行性及肿瘤预后。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical genitourinary cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102290
Takehisa Onishi , Takuji Shibahara , Sho Sekito , Manabu Kato , Yusuke Sugino , Takahiro Inoue
{"title":"肌侵性膀胱癌经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除加全身化疗后膀胱保留策略实现无创降期的可行性及肿瘤预后。","authors":"Takehisa Onishi ,&nbsp;Takuji Shibahara ,&nbsp;Sho Sekito ,&nbsp;Manabu Kato ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sugino ,&nbsp;Takahiro Inoue","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the oncological outcomes of selective bladder preservation therapy, comprising maximal TURBT plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by 2nd-TURBT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2012 to 2022, 110 localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who desired bladder preservation (BP) received maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by restaging (CT scan+ 1st-TURBT) and 2nd-TURBT. Sixty-one patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (PUCUB) who achieved noninvasive downstaging (NID) after NAC and had no residual tumor at 2nd-TURBT underwent conservative treatment (BP group). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cystectomy and distant metastasis-free survival (CDMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the survival outcomes of patients in the BP group with those who underwent NAC + radical cystectomy (RC) and were diagnosed with ypT1 or less (RC group, n = 42). Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed survivals according to each treatment method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the BP group, 5-year OS, CSS, DMFS, and CDMFS were 87.4%, 93.8%, 83.1%, and 76.8%, respectively. MCR models for survival showed no differences in OS (BP: hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, <em>P</em> = .83), CSS (BP: HR 1.15, <em>P</em> = .74), and DMFS (BP: HR 1.09, <em>P</em> = .91) between the matched cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BP therapy incorporating maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by 2nd-TURBT may be used as an alternative therapy to RC for selected muscle-invasive PUCUB patients. As this was a retrospective study, further randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"23 2","pages":"Article 102290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Oncological Outcome of Patients Achieving Noninvasive Downstaging After Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Plus Systemic Chemotherapy for Bladder Preservation Strategy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Takehisa Onishi ,&nbsp;Takuji Shibahara ,&nbsp;Sho Sekito ,&nbsp;Manabu Kato ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sugino ,&nbsp;Takahiro Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the oncological outcomes of selective bladder preservation therapy, comprising maximal TURBT plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by 2nd-TURBT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2012 to 2022, 110 localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who desired bladder preservation (BP) received maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by restaging (CT scan+ 1st-TURBT) and 2nd-TURBT. Sixty-one patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (PUCUB) who achieved noninvasive downstaging (NID) after NAC and had no residual tumor at 2nd-TURBT underwent conservative treatment (BP group). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cystectomy and distant metastasis-free survival (CDMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the survival outcomes of patients in the BP group with those who underwent NAC + radical cystectomy (RC) and were diagnosed with ypT1 or less (RC group, n = 42). Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed survivals according to each treatment method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the BP group, 5-year OS, CSS, DMFS, and CDMFS were 87.4%, 93.8%, 83.1%, and 76.8%, respectively. MCR models for survival showed no differences in OS (BP: hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, <em>P</em> = .83), CSS (BP: HR 1.15, <em>P</em> = .74), and DMFS (BP: HR 1.09, <em>P</em> = .91) between the matched cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BP therapy incorporating maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by 2nd-TURBT may be used as an alternative therapy to RC for selected muscle-invasive PUCUB patients. As this was a retrospective study, further randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400260X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400260X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价选择性膀胱保留治疗的肿瘤预后,包括最大TURBT +新辅助化疗(NAC),再进行第二次TURBT。方法:2012 - 2022年,110例有膀胱保留(BP)需求的局限性肌浸润性膀胱癌患者行最大TURBT + NAC,再行CT扫描+第1次TURBT和第2次TURBT。61例单纯尿路上皮癌(PUCUB)患者在NAC后达到无创降期(NID),第2次turbt无肿瘤残留,接受保守治疗(BP组)。总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、远端无转移生存期(DMFS)、膀胱切除术和远端无转移生存期(CDMFS)采用Kaplan-Meyer方法进行估计。采用倾向评分匹配来比较BP组患者与接受NAC +根治性膀胱切除术(RC)且诊断为ypT1或更少患者的生存结果(RC组,n = 42)。多变量Cox回归(MCR)模型根据每种治疗方法计算生存率。结果:BP组5年OS、CSS、DMFS、CDMFS分别为87.4%、93.8%、83.1%、76.8%。MCR生存模型显示,在匹配队列中,OS (BP:风险比[HR] 1.24, P = 0.83)、CSS (BP: HR 1.15, P = 0.74)和DMFS (BP: HR 1.09, P = 0.91)无差异。结论:对于部分肌肉侵袭性PUCUB患者,采用最大TURBT + NAC再进行第二次TURBT的BP治疗可作为RC的替代疗法。由于这是一项回顾性研究,需要进一步的随机试验和更长时间的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and Oncological Outcome of Patients Achieving Noninvasive Downstaging After Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Plus Systemic Chemotherapy for Bladder Preservation Strategy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the oncological outcomes of selective bladder preservation therapy, comprising maximal TURBT plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by 2nd-TURBT.

Methods

From 2012 to 2022, 110 localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who desired bladder preservation (BP) received maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by restaging (CT scan+ 1st-TURBT) and 2nd-TURBT. Sixty-one patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (PUCUB) who achieved noninvasive downstaging (NID) after NAC and had no residual tumor at 2nd-TURBT underwent conservative treatment (BP group). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cystectomy and distant metastasis-free survival (CDMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the survival outcomes of patients in the BP group with those who underwent NAC + radical cystectomy (RC) and were diagnosed with ypT1 or less (RC group, n = 42). Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed survivals according to each treatment method.

Results

In the BP group, 5-year OS, CSS, DMFS, and CDMFS were 87.4%, 93.8%, 83.1%, and 76.8%, respectively. MCR models for survival showed no differences in OS (BP: hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, P = .83), CSS (BP: HR 1.15, P = .74), and DMFS (BP: HR 1.09, P = .91) between the matched cohort.

Conclusions

BP therapy incorporating maximal TURBT plus NAC followed by 2nd-TURBT may be used as an alternative therapy to RC for selected muscle-invasive PUCUB patients. As this was a retrospective study, further randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Robot-Assisted Cystectomy in Patients With Previous Pelvic Irradiation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: Exploratory Analysis From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 Study Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma A Clinical Case Series of BCGosis as a Rare Complication of Intravesical BCG A Clinicopathologic Study of 1598 Ultrasound-Guided Needle Prostate Biopsies and Trends in Prostate Cancer Over a 14-Year Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1