{"title":"基于前段图像的卷积神经网络识别感染性角膜炎。","authors":"Vannarut Satitpitakul, Apiwit Puangsricharern, Surachet Yuktiratna, Yossapon Jaisarn, Keeratika Sangsao, Vilavun Puangsricharern, Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Thanachaporn Kittipibul","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S496552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a comprehensively deep learning algorithm to differentiate between bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study collected slit-lamp photos of patients with bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal cornea. Causative organisms of infectious keratitis were identified by either positive culture or clinical response to single treatment. Convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, DenseNet121, VGG19) and Ensemble with probability weighting were used to develop a deep learning algorithm. The performance including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity and AUC has been reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 6478 photos from 2171 eyes, composed of 2400 bacterial keratitis, 1616 fungal keratitis, 1545 non-infectious corneal lesions, and 917 normal corneas were collected from hospital database. DenseNet121 demonstrated the best performance among three convolutional neural networks with the accuracy of 0.8 (95% CI 0.74-0.86). The ensemble technique showed higher performance than single algorithm with the accuracy of 0.83 (95% 0.78-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Convolutional neural networks with ensemble techniques provided the best performance in discriminating bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas. Our models can be used as a screening tool for non-ophthalmic health care providers and ophthalmologists for rapid provisional diagnosis of infectious keratitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Convolutional Neural Network Using Anterior Segment Photos for Infectious Keratitis Identification.\",\"authors\":\"Vannarut Satitpitakul, Apiwit Puangsricharern, Surachet Yuktiratna, Yossapon Jaisarn, Keeratika Sangsao, Vilavun Puangsricharern, Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Thanachaporn Kittipibul\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S496552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a comprehensively deep learning algorithm to differentiate between bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study collected slit-lamp photos of patients with bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal cornea. Causative organisms of infectious keratitis were identified by either positive culture or clinical response to single treatment. Convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, DenseNet121, VGG19) and Ensemble with probability weighting were used to develop a deep learning algorithm. The performance including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity and AUC has been reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 6478 photos from 2171 eyes, composed of 2400 bacterial keratitis, 1616 fungal keratitis, 1545 non-infectious corneal lesions, and 917 normal corneas were collected from hospital database. DenseNet121 demonstrated the best performance among three convolutional neural networks with the accuracy of 0.8 (95% CI 0.74-0.86). The ensemble technique showed higher performance than single algorithm with the accuracy of 0.83 (95% 0.78-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Convolutional neural networks with ensemble techniques provided the best performance in discriminating bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas. Our models can be used as a screening tool for non-ophthalmic health care providers and ophthalmologists for rapid provisional diagnosis of infectious keratitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"73-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S496552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S496552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:开发一种区分细菌性角膜炎、真菌性角膜炎、非感染性角膜病变和正常角膜的综合深度学习算法。方法:回顾性收集细菌性角膜炎、真菌性角膜炎、非感染性角膜病变和正常角膜患者的裂隙灯照片。通过培养阳性或对单一治疗的临床反应来鉴定感染性角膜炎的致病微生物。使用卷积神经网络(ResNet50, DenseNet121, VGG19)和概率加权的Ensemble来开发深度学习算法。准确度、精密度、召回率、F1评分、特异性和AUC等指标均有报道。结果:从医院数据库中共收集到2171只眼的照片6478张,其中细菌性角膜炎2400张,真菌性角膜炎1616张,非感染性角膜病变1545张,正常角膜917张。DenseNet121在三个卷积神经网络中表现最好,准确率为0.8 (95% CI 0.74-0.86)。集成技术的准确率为0.83(95% 0.78 ~ 0.88),优于单一算法。结论:卷积神经网络集成技术对细菌性角膜炎、真菌性角膜炎、非感染性角膜病变和正常角膜的鉴别效果最好。我们的模型可以作为非眼科保健提供者和眼科医生快速临时诊断感染性角膜炎的筛查工具。
A Convolutional Neural Network Using Anterior Segment Photos for Infectious Keratitis Identification.
Purpose: To develop a comprehensively deep learning algorithm to differentiate between bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas.
Methods: This retrospective study collected slit-lamp photos of patients with bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal cornea. Causative organisms of infectious keratitis were identified by either positive culture or clinical response to single treatment. Convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, DenseNet121, VGG19) and Ensemble with probability weighting were used to develop a deep learning algorithm. The performance including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity and AUC has been reported.
Results: Total of 6478 photos from 2171 eyes, composed of 2400 bacterial keratitis, 1616 fungal keratitis, 1545 non-infectious corneal lesions, and 917 normal corneas were collected from hospital database. DenseNet121 demonstrated the best performance among three convolutional neural networks with the accuracy of 0.8 (95% CI 0.74-0.86). The ensemble technique showed higher performance than single algorithm with the accuracy of 0.83 (95% 0.78-0.88).
Conclusion: Convolutional neural networks with ensemble techniques provided the best performance in discriminating bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, non-infectious corneal lesions, and normal corneas. Our models can be used as a screening tool for non-ophthalmic health care providers and ophthalmologists for rapid provisional diagnosis of infectious keratitis.