标题:ChatGPT 4.0 能否可靠地回答患者关于拳击手骨折的常见问题?

Christopher A White, Jamie L Kator, Hannah S Rhee, Thomas Boucher, Rachel Glenn, Amanda Walsh, Jaehon M Kim
{"title":"标题:ChatGPT 4.0 能否可靠地回答患者关于拳击手骨折的常见问题?","authors":"Christopher A White, Jamie L Kator, Hannah S Rhee, Thomas Boucher, Rachel Glenn, Amanda Walsh, Jaehon M Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are increasingly turning to the internet, and recently artificial intelligence engines (e.g., ChatGPT), for answers to common medical questions. Regarding orthopedic hand surgery, recent literature has focused on ChatGPT's ability to answer patient frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding subjects such as carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fractures, and more. The present study seeks to determine how accurately ChatGPT can answer patient FAQs surrounding simple fracture patterns such as fifth metacarpal neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Internet queries were used to identify the ten most FAQs regarding boxer's fractures based on information from five trusted healthcare institutions. These ten questions were posed to ChatGPT 4.0, and the chatbot's responses were recorded. Two fellowship trained orthopedic hand surgeons and one orthopedic hand surgery fellow then graded ChatGPT's responses on an alphabetical grading scale (i.e., A-F); additional commentary was then provided for each response. Descriptive statistics were used to report question, grader, and overall ChatGPT response grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT achieved a cumulative grade of a B, indicating that the chatbot can provide adequate responses with only minor need for clarification when answering FAQs for boxer's fractures. Individual graders provided comparable overall grades of B, B, and B+ respectively. ChatGPT deferred to a medical professional in 7/10 responses. General questions were graded at an A-. Management questions were graded at a C+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, with a grade of B, ChatGPT 4.0 provides adequate-to- complete responses as it pertains to patient FAQs surrounding boxer's fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can ChatGPT 4.0 reliably answer patient frequently asked questions about boxer's fractures?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A White, Jamie L Kator, Hannah S Rhee, Thomas Boucher, Rachel Glenn, Amanda Walsh, Jaehon M Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are increasingly turning to the internet, and recently artificial intelligence engines (e.g., ChatGPT), for answers to common medical questions. Regarding orthopedic hand surgery, recent literature has focused on ChatGPT's ability to answer patient frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding subjects such as carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fractures, and more. The present study seeks to determine how accurately ChatGPT can answer patient FAQs surrounding simple fracture patterns such as fifth metacarpal neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Internet queries were used to identify the ten most FAQs regarding boxer's fractures based on information from five trusted healthcare institutions. These ten questions were posed to ChatGPT 4.0, and the chatbot's responses were recorded. Two fellowship trained orthopedic hand surgeons and one orthopedic hand surgery fellow then graded ChatGPT's responses on an alphabetical grading scale (i.e., A-F); additional commentary was then provided for each response. Descriptive statistics were used to report question, grader, and overall ChatGPT response grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT achieved a cumulative grade of a B, indicating that the chatbot can provide adequate responses with only minor need for clarification when answering FAQs for boxer's fractures. Individual graders provided comparable overall grades of B, B, and B+ respectively. ChatGPT deferred to a medical professional in 7/10 responses. General questions were graded at an A-. Management questions were graded at a C+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, with a grade of B, ChatGPT 4.0 provides adequate-to- complete responses as it pertains to patient FAQs surrounding boxer's fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者越来越多地通过互联网以及最近的人工智能引擎(如 ChatGPT)来寻求常见医疗问题的答案。关于骨科手外科,最近的文献主要关注 ChatGPT 回答患者常见问题(FAQ)的能力,如腕管综合征、桡骨远端骨折等。本研究旨在确定 ChatGPT 能否准确回答患者围绕第五掌骨颈骨折等简单骨折模式提出的常见问题:方法:根据五家值得信赖的医疗机构提供的信息,通过互联网查询确定了有关拳击手骨折的十大常见问题。将这十个问题提交给 ChatGPT 4.0,并记录聊天机器人的回复。然后,两名经过研究员培训的骨科手外科医生和一名骨科手外科研究员按照字母分级表(即 A-F)对 ChatGPT 的回答进行了分级,并对每个回答进行了补充评论。描述性统计用于报告问题、评分者和 ChatGPT 答复的总体等级:结果:ChatGPT 的累计评分为 B,表明聊天机器人在回答拳击手骨折常见问题时可以提供充分的回答,只需稍加说明即可。各评分员分别给出了 B、B 和 B + 的可比总分。ChatGPT 在 7/10 个回答中听从了医疗专业人员的意见。一般问题的评分为 A-。结论:总的来说,ChatGPT 4.0 在拳击手骨折相关的患者常见问题方面提供了足够到完整的回答,评级为 B。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can ChatGPT 4.0 reliably answer patient frequently asked questions about boxer's fractures?

Background: Patients are increasingly turning to the internet, and recently artificial intelligence engines (e.g., ChatGPT), for answers to common medical questions. Regarding orthopedic hand surgery, recent literature has focused on ChatGPT's ability to answer patient frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding subjects such as carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fractures, and more. The present study seeks to determine how accurately ChatGPT can answer patient FAQs surrounding simple fracture patterns such as fifth metacarpal neck fractures.

Methods: Internet queries were used to identify the ten most FAQs regarding boxer's fractures based on information from five trusted healthcare institutions. These ten questions were posed to ChatGPT 4.0, and the chatbot's responses were recorded. Two fellowship trained orthopedic hand surgeons and one orthopedic hand surgery fellow then graded ChatGPT's responses on an alphabetical grading scale (i.e., A-F); additional commentary was then provided for each response. Descriptive statistics were used to report question, grader, and overall ChatGPT response grades.

Results: ChatGPT achieved a cumulative grade of a B, indicating that the chatbot can provide adequate responses with only minor need for clarification when answering FAQs for boxer's fractures. Individual graders provided comparable overall grades of B, B, and B+ respectively. ChatGPT deferred to a medical professional in 7/10 responses. General questions were graded at an A-. Management questions were graded at a C+.

Conclusion: Overall, with a grade of B, ChatGPT 4.0 provides adequate-to- complete responses as it pertains to patient FAQs surrounding boxer's fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in the Forearm: Ultrasound-Guided surgical technique. Breaking stiffness: A non-invasive solution for proximal interphalangeal joint rigidity. Breaking the cycle: Addressing the drucebo effect in hand rehabilitation. Correspondence. Reply to the article "Cornelis S, Mufty S, Peters S. Isolated distal radioulnar joint septic arthritis, the intact triangular fibrocartilaginous complex serving as an anatomical barrier. Hand Surg Rehabil, January 2025. Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the hand in an adult.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1