政府领导的保护计划中的保护基因组学:一个澳大利亚的案例研究,探索濒危植物的成本和收益。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Annals of botany Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1093/aob/mcae222
Chantelle A T Doyle, Manuela Cascini, Jia-Yee Samantha Yap, Hannah Matthews, Patricia M Hogbin, Trevor C Wilson, Erica Mahon, Dianne Brown, Aaron Mulcahy, Rachel Brown, Maurizio Rossetto
{"title":"政府领导的保护计划中的保护基因组学:一个澳大利亚的案例研究,探索濒危植物的成本和收益。","authors":"Chantelle A T Doyle, Manuela Cascini, Jia-Yee Samantha Yap, Hannah Matthews, Patricia M Hogbin, Trevor C Wilson, Erica Mahon, Dianne Brown, Aaron Mulcahy, Rachel Brown, Maurizio Rossetto","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of conserving plant genetic diversity has been recognised since the 1980's, but genetic research tools for improving conservation remain largely absent from standard planning. Using an Australian case study framework of the New South Wales Government's Saving our Species program, we outline the costs and benefits associated with conducting genomic analysis within a conservation strategy to inform for example, taxonomic resolution, targeted monitoring, translocations and ex situ collections. Despite a reported sentiment that costs are prohibitive, our study identified that where genetics reports have been provided (32 to date), the cost of genetic sampling, analysis and advice is less than 10% of the total Government investment (SoS program) and will continue decreasing proportionally throughout the years as other management occurs. We identified the largest Government investment was for maintenance and monitoring actions. On-ground practitioner feedback from the reports identified that the main reason for requesting genetics was to inform translocation or ex situ collection. However, from the total of two hundred and sixty-nine plant species with translocation or ex situ conservation actions planned, 75.4% still do not have provisions for genomics, suggesting that knowledge of the utility of this practice is low among practitioners. Responsive feedback also demonstrated that 90% of respondents seek additional learning, thus there is merit in providing future genomics focused workshops.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation genomics within government led conservation planning: an Australian case study exploring cost and benefit for threatened flora.\",\"authors\":\"Chantelle A T Doyle, Manuela Cascini, Jia-Yee Samantha Yap, Hannah Matthews, Patricia M Hogbin, Trevor C Wilson, Erica Mahon, Dianne Brown, Aaron Mulcahy, Rachel Brown, Maurizio Rossetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aob/mcae222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The importance of conserving plant genetic diversity has been recognised since the 1980's, but genetic research tools for improving conservation remain largely absent from standard planning. Using an Australian case study framework of the New South Wales Government's Saving our Species program, we outline the costs and benefits associated with conducting genomic analysis within a conservation strategy to inform for example, taxonomic resolution, targeted monitoring, translocations and ex situ collections. Despite a reported sentiment that costs are prohibitive, our study identified that where genetics reports have been provided (32 to date), the cost of genetic sampling, analysis and advice is less than 10% of the total Government investment (SoS program) and will continue decreasing proportionally throughout the years as other management occurs. We identified the largest Government investment was for maintenance and monitoring actions. On-ground practitioner feedback from the reports identified that the main reason for requesting genetics was to inform translocation or ex situ collection. However, from the total of two hundred and sixty-nine plant species with translocation or ex situ conservation actions planned, 75.4% still do not have provisions for genomics, suggesting that knowledge of the utility of this practice is low among practitioners. Responsive feedback also demonstrated that 90% of respondents seek additional learning, thus there is merit in providing future genomics focused workshops.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,保护植物遗传多样性的重要性已经被认识到,但是用于改善保护的遗传研究工具在标准规划中仍然很大程度上缺失。利用新南威尔士州政府“拯救我们的物种”计划的澳大利亚案例研究框架,我们概述了在保护策略中进行基因组分析的成本和收益,例如,分类决议,有针对性的监测,易位和迁地收集。尽管有报道称成本过高,但我们的研究发现,在提供遗传学报告的地方(迄今为止有32份),基因取样、分析和咨询的成本不到政府总投资(SoS计划)的10%,并且随着其他管理措施的出现,未来几年将继续按比例下降。我们确定最大的政府投资是用于维护和监测行动。实地从业者从报告中反馈的意见确定,要求遗传学的主要原因是为易位或移位收集提供信息。然而,在计划采取易位或迁地保护行动的269种植物中,75.4%的植物仍然没有基因组学的规定,这表明从业者对这种做法的效用了解较低。响应性反馈还表明,90%的受访者寻求额外的学习,因此,在未来提供以基因组学为重点的研讨会是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservation genomics within government led conservation planning: an Australian case study exploring cost and benefit for threatened flora.

The importance of conserving plant genetic diversity has been recognised since the 1980's, but genetic research tools for improving conservation remain largely absent from standard planning. Using an Australian case study framework of the New South Wales Government's Saving our Species program, we outline the costs and benefits associated with conducting genomic analysis within a conservation strategy to inform for example, taxonomic resolution, targeted monitoring, translocations and ex situ collections. Despite a reported sentiment that costs are prohibitive, our study identified that where genetics reports have been provided (32 to date), the cost of genetic sampling, analysis and advice is less than 10% of the total Government investment (SoS program) and will continue decreasing proportionally throughout the years as other management occurs. We identified the largest Government investment was for maintenance and monitoring actions. On-ground practitioner feedback from the reports identified that the main reason for requesting genetics was to inform translocation or ex situ collection. However, from the total of two hundred and sixty-nine plant species with translocation or ex situ conservation actions planned, 75.4% still do not have provisions for genomics, suggesting that knowledge of the utility of this practice is low among practitioners. Responsive feedback also demonstrated that 90% of respondents seek additional learning, thus there is merit in providing future genomics focused workshops.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
期刊最新文献
Comparative pericarp biomechanics and germination physiology of Raphanus raphanistrum and Raphanus pugioniformis indehicent fruits. Contrasting habitat associations and ecophysiological adaptations drive interspecific growth differences among Himalayan high-mountain plants. Distinct patterns of genome size evolution in each bryophyte lineage are not correlated with whole genome duplication. Monitoring genetic diversity of Torminalis glaberrima for resilient forests in the face of population fragmentation. Niche shift and localized competitive dynamics influence the persistence and distribution of polyploids in the genus Achillea (Asteraceae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1