BRUE患儿诊断为口咽吞咽困难或胃食管反流疾病的结局:一项来自儿科健康信息系统数据库的多中心研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s00431-025-05980-6
Daniel R Duncan, Enju Liu, Clare Golden, Amanda S Growdon, Dionne A Graham, Christopher P Landrigan, Rachel L Rosen
{"title":"BRUE患儿诊断为口咽吞咽困难或胃食管反流疾病的结局:一项来自儿科健康信息系统数据库的多中心研究","authors":"Daniel R Duncan, Enju Liu, Clare Golden, Amanda S Growdon, Dionne A Graham, Christopher P Landrigan, Rachel L Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-05980-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and oropharyngeal dysphagia as explanatory diagnoses, risk factors for acid suppression treatment, and risk factors for repeat hospital visit in infants hospitalized after brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) using a multicenter pediatric database. We performed a multicenter retrospective database study of infants admitted with BRUE in the Pediatric Health Information System between 2016 and 2021. Data included diagnostic testing, explanatory diagnoses, treatment with acid suppression, and related repeat hospital visits within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for treatment with acid suppression and repeat hospital visit. Of 17,558 subjects admitted to 47 hospitals, 34% were given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD and 1.4% oropharyngeal dysphagia. Twelve percent were treated with acid suppression, with some centers having rates as high as 26%. Multiple factors, including most notably the GERD diagnosis, were associated with increased prescribing risk. Ten percent of subjects had repeat hospital visits. Subjects given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.86, p < 0.001) or oropharyngeal dysphagia (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.55-2.91, p < 0.001) had increased risk for repeat hospital visit as did those treated with acid suppression. CONCLUSION: GERD as an explanatory diagnosis was associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit, despite its conception as a benign, treatable condition. Treatment with acid suppression was common but did not prevent repeat hospitalization. Oropharyngeal dysphagia as an explanatory diagnosis was also associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 2","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes for infants with BRUE diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter study from the Pediatric Health Information System Database.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R Duncan, Enju Liu, Clare Golden, Amanda S Growdon, Dionne A Graham, Christopher P Landrigan, Rachel L Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-025-05980-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and oropharyngeal dysphagia as explanatory diagnoses, risk factors for acid suppression treatment, and risk factors for repeat hospital visit in infants hospitalized after brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) using a multicenter pediatric database. We performed a multicenter retrospective database study of infants admitted with BRUE in the Pediatric Health Information System between 2016 and 2021. Data included diagnostic testing, explanatory diagnoses, treatment with acid suppression, and related repeat hospital visits within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for treatment with acid suppression and repeat hospital visit. Of 17,558 subjects admitted to 47 hospitals, 34% were given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD and 1.4% oropharyngeal dysphagia. Twelve percent were treated with acid suppression, with some centers having rates as high as 26%. Multiple factors, including most notably the GERD diagnosis, were associated with increased prescribing risk. Ten percent of subjects had repeat hospital visits. Subjects given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.86, p < 0.001) or oropharyngeal dysphagia (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.55-2.91, p < 0.001) had increased risk for repeat hospital visit as did those treated with acid suppression. CONCLUSION: GERD as an explanatory diagnosis was associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit, despite its conception as a benign, treatable condition. Treatment with acid suppression was common but did not prevent repeat hospitalization. Oropharyngeal dysphagia as an explanatory diagnosis was also associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 2\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-05980-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-05980-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是利用多中心儿科数据库确定胃食管反流病(GERD)和口咽吞咽困难的患病率,作为解释性诊断,抑酸治疗的危险因素,以及在短暂解决不明原因事件(BRUE)后住院的婴儿再次住院的危险因素。我们对2016年至2021年间儿科健康信息系统中入院的BRUE婴儿进行了一项多中心回顾性数据库研究。数据包括诊断测试、解释性诊断、抑酸治疗以及6个月内相关的重复医院就诊。多变量logistic回归模型用于确定酸抑制治疗和重复就诊的危险因素。在47家医院的17558名受试者中,34%的人被诊断为胃食管反流,1.4%的人被诊断为口咽吞咽困难。12%的人接受了抑酸治疗,有些中心的抑酸率高达26%。多种因素,包括最显著的GERD诊断,与处方风险增加有关。10%的研究对象反复去医院就诊。给予GERD解释性诊断的受试者(OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.86, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes for infants with BRUE diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter study from the Pediatric Health Information System Database.

We aimed to determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and oropharyngeal dysphagia as explanatory diagnoses, risk factors for acid suppression treatment, and risk factors for repeat hospital visit in infants hospitalized after brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) using a multicenter pediatric database. We performed a multicenter retrospective database study of infants admitted with BRUE in the Pediatric Health Information System between 2016 and 2021. Data included diagnostic testing, explanatory diagnoses, treatment with acid suppression, and related repeat hospital visits within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for treatment with acid suppression and repeat hospital visit. Of 17,558 subjects admitted to 47 hospitals, 34% were given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD and 1.4% oropharyngeal dysphagia. Twelve percent were treated with acid suppression, with some centers having rates as high as 26%. Multiple factors, including most notably the GERD diagnosis, were associated with increased prescribing risk. Ten percent of subjects had repeat hospital visits. Subjects given an explanatory diagnosis of GERD (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.86, p < 0.001) or oropharyngeal dysphagia (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.55-2.91, p < 0.001) had increased risk for repeat hospital visit as did those treated with acid suppression. CONCLUSION: GERD as an explanatory diagnosis was associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit, despite its conception as a benign, treatable condition. Treatment with acid suppression was common but did not prevent repeat hospitalization. Oropharyngeal dysphagia as an explanatory diagnosis was also associated with increased risk of repeat hospital visit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Access to child-appropriate medicines: an exploratory survey of the use of paediatric use marketing authorisation products in the UK. Under-five mortality and social determinants in africa: a systematic review. Assessment of delirium in Indonesian pediatric intensive care unit: a psychometric evaluation of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium. The timing and safety of topical timolol treatment for superficial infantile hemangioma: a retrospective cohort study. Development and maintenance of consensus recommendations on pediatric outpatient antibiotic therapy in Germany: a framework for rational use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1