Munaib Din , Karan Daga , Jihad Saoud , David Wood , Patrick Kierkegaard , Peter Brex , Thomas C Booth
{"title":"临床医生对使用人工智能对MRI脑部扫描进行分类的看法。","authors":"Munaib Din , Karan Daga , Jihad Saoud , David Wood , Patrick Kierkegaard , Peter Brex , Thomas C Booth","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can triage radiology scans to streamline the patient pathway and also relieve clinician workload. Validated AI tools can mitigate the delays in reporting scans by flagging time-sensitive and actionable findings. In this study, we aim to investigate current stakeholder perspectives and identify obstacles to integrating AI in clinical pathways. We created a survey to ascertain the perspectives of 133 clinicians across the United Kingdom regarding the acceptability of an AI tool that triages MRI brain scans into ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’. As part of this survey, we supplied clinicians with information on training and validation case numbers, model performance, validation using unseen data, and explainability saliency maps. With regards to the specific use case of AI in MRI brain scans, 71% of respondents preferred the use of an AI-assisted triage compared to the current system without triage, typically chronologically. Notably, information that explained and helped visualise the AI model's decision making was found to improve clinician confidence. When shown a heatmap, 60% of participants felt more confident in the AI’s decision. The results of this short communication demonstrate a positive support for the implementation of AI-assistive tools in triage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence to triage MRI brain scans\",\"authors\":\"Munaib Din , Karan Daga , Jihad Saoud , David Wood , Patrick Kierkegaard , Peter Brex , Thomas C Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can triage radiology scans to streamline the patient pathway and also relieve clinician workload. Validated AI tools can mitigate the delays in reporting scans by flagging time-sensitive and actionable findings. In this study, we aim to investigate current stakeholder perspectives and identify obstacles to integrating AI in clinical pathways. We created a survey to ascertain the perspectives of 133 clinicians across the United Kingdom regarding the acceptability of an AI tool that triages MRI brain scans into ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’. As part of this survey, we supplied clinicians with information on training and validation case numbers, model performance, validation using unseen data, and explainability saliency maps. With regards to the specific use case of AI in MRI brain scans, 71% of respondents preferred the use of an AI-assisted triage compared to the current system without triage, typically chronologically. Notably, information that explained and helped visualise the AI model's decision making was found to improve clinician confidence. When shown a heatmap, 60% of participants felt more confident in the AI’s decision. The results of this short communication demonstrate a positive support for the implementation of AI-assistive tools in triage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicians’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence to triage MRI brain scans
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can triage radiology scans to streamline the patient pathway and also relieve clinician workload. Validated AI tools can mitigate the delays in reporting scans by flagging time-sensitive and actionable findings. In this study, we aim to investigate current stakeholder perspectives and identify obstacles to integrating AI in clinical pathways. We created a survey to ascertain the perspectives of 133 clinicians across the United Kingdom regarding the acceptability of an AI tool that triages MRI brain scans into ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’. As part of this survey, we supplied clinicians with information on training and validation case numbers, model performance, validation using unseen data, and explainability saliency maps. With regards to the specific use case of AI in MRI brain scans, 71% of respondents preferred the use of an AI-assisted triage compared to the current system without triage, typically chronologically. Notably, information that explained and helped visualise the AI model's decision making was found to improve clinician confidence. When shown a heatmap, 60% of participants felt more confident in the AI’s decision. The results of this short communication demonstrate a positive support for the implementation of AI-assistive tools in triage.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.