Ying Xin Li, Yan Ling Hu, Xi Huang, Jie Li, Xia Li, Ze Yao Shi, Ru Yang, Xiujuan Zhang, Yuan Li, Qiong Chen
{"title":"围产期婴儿的存活结果:比较不同收入国家和不同时期的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ying Xin Li, Yan Ling Hu, Xi Huang, Jie Li, Xia Li, Ze Yao Shi, Ru Yang, Xiujuan Zhang, Yuan Li, Qiong Chen","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periviable infants are a highly vulnerable neonatal group, and their survival rates are considerably affected by patient-, caregiver-, and institution-level factors, exhibiting wide variability across different income countries and time periods. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of periviable infants and compare rates among countries with varied income levels and across different time periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Cohort studies reporting survival outcomes by gestational age (GA) for periviable infants born between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation were considered. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Data pooling was achieved using random-effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies from 25 countries were included, covering 56,526 live births and 59,104 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Survival rates for infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of GA ranged from 7% (95% CI 5-10; 22 studies, <i>n</i> = 5,658; low certainty) to 68% (95% CI 63-72; 35 studies, <i>n</i> = 21,897; low certainty) when calculated using live births as the denominator, and from 30% (95% CI 25-36; 31 studies, <i>n</i> = 3,991; very low certainty) to 74% (95% CI 70-77; 48 studies, <i>n</i> = 17,664, very low certainty) for those admitted to NICUs. The survival rates improved over the two decades studied; however, stark contrasts were evident across countries with varying income levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the survival rates for periviable infants have improved over the past two decades, substantial disparities persist across different economic settings, highlighting global inequalities in perinatal health. Continued research and collaborative efforts are imperative to further improve the global survival and long-term outcomes of periviable infants, especially those in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42022376367, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022376367.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1454433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival outcomes among periviable infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different income countries and time periods.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Xin Li, Yan Ling Hu, Xi Huang, Jie Li, Xia Li, Ze Yao Shi, Ru Yang, Xiujuan Zhang, Yuan Li, Qiong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periviable infants are a highly vulnerable neonatal group, and their survival rates are considerably affected by patient-, caregiver-, and institution-level factors, exhibiting wide variability across different income countries and time periods. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of periviable infants and compare rates among countries with varied income levels and across different time periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Cohort studies reporting survival outcomes by gestational age (GA) for periviable infants born between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation were considered. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Data pooling was achieved using random-effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies from 25 countries were included, covering 56,526 live births and 59,104 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Survival rates for infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of GA ranged from 7% (95% CI 5-10; 22 studies, <i>n</i> = 5,658; low certainty) to 68% (95% CI 63-72; 35 studies, <i>n</i> = 21,897; low certainty) when calculated using live births as the denominator, and from 30% (95% CI 25-36; 31 studies, <i>n</i> = 3,991; very low certainty) to 74% (95% CI 70-77; 48 studies, <i>n</i> = 17,664, very low certainty) for those admitted to NICUs. The survival rates improved over the two decades studied; however, stark contrasts were evident across countries with varying income levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the survival rates for periviable infants have improved over the past two decades, substantial disparities persist across different economic settings, highlighting global inequalities in perinatal health. Continued research and collaborative efforts are imperative to further improve the global survival and long-term outcomes of periviable infants, especially those in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42022376367, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022376367.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1454433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival outcomes among periviable infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different income countries and time periods.
Background: Periviable infants are a highly vulnerable neonatal group, and their survival rates are considerably affected by patient-, caregiver-, and institution-level factors, exhibiting wide variability across different income countries and time periods. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of periviable infants and compare rates among countries with varied income levels and across different time periods.
Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Cohort studies reporting survival outcomes by gestational age (GA) for periviable infants born between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation were considered. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Data pooling was achieved using random-effects meta-analyses.
Results: Sixty-nine studies from 25 countries were included, covering 56,526 live births and 59,104 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Survival rates for infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of GA ranged from 7% (95% CI 5-10; 22 studies, n = 5,658; low certainty) to 68% (95% CI 63-72; 35 studies, n = 21,897; low certainty) when calculated using live births as the denominator, and from 30% (95% CI 25-36; 31 studies, n = 3,991; very low certainty) to 74% (95% CI 70-77; 48 studies, n = 17,664, very low certainty) for those admitted to NICUs. The survival rates improved over the two decades studied; however, stark contrasts were evident across countries with varying income levels.
Conclusion: Although the survival rates for periviable infants have improved over the past two decades, substantial disparities persist across different economic settings, highlighting global inequalities in perinatal health. Continued research and collaborative efforts are imperative to further improve the global survival and long-term outcomes of periviable infants, especially those in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022376367, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022376367.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice.
Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.