Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti
{"title":"鉴别成人牙周健康状况的即时aMMP-8测试的诊断准确性:验证试验和更新的荟萃分析","authors":"Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-Of-Care aMMP-8 Test for Discriminating Periodontal Health Status in Adults: Validation Trials and Updated Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.14119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14119\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-Of-Care aMMP-8 Test for Discriminating Periodontal Health Status in Adults: Validation Trials and Updated Meta-Analysis.
Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.
Methods: The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.
Results: Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).
Conclusion: There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.