鉴别成人牙周健康状况的即时aMMP-8测试的诊断准确性:验证试验和更新的荟萃分析

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Periodontology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/jcpe.14119
Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti
{"title":"鉴别成人牙周健康状况的即时aMMP-8测试的诊断准确性:验证试验和更新的荟萃分析","authors":"Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-Of-Care aMMP-8 Test for Discriminating Periodontal Health Status in Adults: Validation Trials and Updated Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Li, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Junyu Shi, Xinyu Wu, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Ke Deng, Xiao Zhang, Hongchang Lai, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Maurizio S Tonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.14119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14119\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在两项独立研究中评估活性基质金属蛋白酶-8 (aMMP-8)即时口腔冲洗试验(POC-ORT)预测treatment-naïve受试者牙周炎的诊断准确性,并更新最近的荟萃分析。方法:在中国香港的代表性人群和中国上海的连续方便样本中进行aMMP-8 POC-ORT指数测试。参考标准为2017年世界牙周病分类研讨会。评估灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积。原始数据被用于更新最近的一项贝叶斯荟萃分析,该分析遵循当前的Cochrane诊断试验指南。GRADE框架用于解释证据的强度和确定性。结果:香港和上海的研究分别纳入384名和390名受试者;牙周炎分别为74.5%和67.2%。两项研究中,ammp -8阳性检测预测牙周炎的AUROC分别为0.661和0.669。最新的系统综述和荟萃分析包括8项研究和2048名受试者。在考虑偏倚、间断性、不一致性、不精确性和发表偏倚的风险后,该方法的灵敏度为0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75),特异性为0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93),分层总结AUROC为0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81)。结论:aMMP-8 POC-ORT检测预测牙周炎具有低至中等敏感性、中至高特异性和中等准确性。它的高假阴性率使临床检查无法替代。中等至高的阳性预测值表明,在医学环境中,阳性检测对牙周炎的自我检测或共同管理及其与多种检测诊断相结合具有潜在的效用。进一步的调查是非常有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-Of-Care aMMP-8 Test for Discriminating Periodontal Health Status in Adults: Validation Trials and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.

Methods: The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve were assessed. The original data were used to update a recent Bayesian meta-analysis following the current Cochrane guideline for diagnostic trials. The GRADE framework was used to interpret the strength and certainty of the evidence.

Results: Three-hundred and eighty-four and 390 subjects were enrolled in the Hong Kong and Shanghai studies, respectively; 74.5% and 67.2% had periodontitis. An aMMP-8-positive test predicted periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.661 and 0.669 in the two studies. The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included eight studies and 2048 subjects. After considering the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias, it showed moderate certainty of a sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CrI: 0.42-0.75), a specificity of 0.82 (95% CrI: 0.68-0.93) and a hierarchical summary AUROC of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.74-0.81).

Conclusion: There is moderate certainty that the aMMP-8 POC-ORT test predicts periodontitis with low to moderate sensitivity, moderate to high specificity, and moderate accuracy. Its high false-negative rate does not allow the replacement of clinical examinations when available. The moderate to high positive predictive value shows the potential utility of a positive test for self-detection or co-management of periodontitis in a medical setting and its incorporation in multi-test diagnostics. Further investigations are highly warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Application of the 2018 Periodontal Status Classification to Epidemiological Survey Data (ACES) Framework to Estimate the Periodontitis Prevalence in the United States. Prevalence of Periodontitis in a 70-Year-Old Population in Western Norway According to the ACES 2018 Classification Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of the Histological Structure of an Anterior as well as a Posterior Biopsy From the Human Palate: A Comparative Study Molar Incisor Hypomineralization and Periodontitis in Adolescents: A Population‐Based Study LRP5 Down‐Regulation Exacerbates Inflammation and Alveolar Bone Loss in Periodontitis by Inhibiting PI3K/c‐FOS Signalling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1