{"title":"骨扩张作为水平牙槽嵴增强技术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Azadi, Parham Hazrati, Ashkan Tizno, Fatemeh Rezaei, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Reza Tabrizi","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone expansion is one of the quickest, simplest, and most reliable methods of alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement. This systematic review is designed to investigate the outcomes of the bone expansion technique for horizontal ridge augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of study has been prospectively registered into PROSPERO (CRD42023414686). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Human original articles utilizing different bone expansion procedures for horizontal ridge augmentation without the use of bone materials or combined with vertical ridge augmentation techniques were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis have been conducted. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-regression, forest plots random-effect model, and weighted mean difference were used for analysis. Leave-one-out influence analysis for finding outliers. Egger's publication bias test and Funnel plots were used to address publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3291 records were identified. Ten articles were included in this study after screening. The survival and complication rates of implants placed simultaneously with bone expansion was 100% 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. The meta-regression revealed that by each month passing from the implant placement the survival probability would be decreased significantly by 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03). The weighted mean ridge width difference before and after the osseodensification was 1.55 mm (95% CI: 0.92-2.17 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study's limitations it can be concluded that the bone expansion procedure can be considered an efficient and safe method regarding the survival and complication rates of placed implants.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone expansion as a horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Azadi, Parham Hazrati, Ashkan Tizno, Fatemeh Rezaei, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Reza Tabrizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone expansion is one of the quickest, simplest, and most reliable methods of alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement. This systematic review is designed to investigate the outcomes of the bone expansion technique for horizontal ridge augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of study has been prospectively registered into PROSPERO (CRD42023414686). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Human original articles utilizing different bone expansion procedures for horizontal ridge augmentation without the use of bone materials or combined with vertical ridge augmentation techniques were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis have been conducted. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-regression, forest plots random-effect model, and weighted mean difference were used for analysis. Leave-one-out influence analysis for finding outliers. Egger's publication bias test and Funnel plots were used to address publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3291 records were identified. Ten articles were included in this study after screening. The survival and complication rates of implants placed simultaneously with bone expansion was 100% 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. The meta-regression revealed that by each month passing from the implant placement the survival probability would be decreased significantly by 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03). The weighted mean ridge width difference before and after the osseodensification was 1.55 mm (95% CI: 0.92-2.17 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study's limitations it can be concluded that the bone expansion procedure can be considered an efficient and safe method regarding the survival and complication rates of placed implants.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:骨扩张术是为种植体植入而进行牙槽嵴增高的最快速、最简单、最可靠的方法之一。本系统性综述旨在研究骨扩张技术用于水平牙槽嵴增量的效果:研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023414686)上进行了前瞻性注册。检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库。研究纳入了利用不同的骨扩张程序进行水平牙脊增量的人类原创文章,这些程序不使用骨材料或与垂直牙脊增量技术相结合。进行了定性和定量的综合分析。采用 I 平方来评估异质性。采用元回归、森林图随机效应模型和加权平均差进行分析。为发现异常值,采用了剔除影响分析法。采用Egger发表偏倚检验和Funnel图来解决发表偏倚问题:共发现 3291 条记录。经过筛选,10 篇文章被纳入本研究。与骨扩张同时植入的种植体的存活率和并发症发生率分别为 100%(95% CI:99-100%)和 0%(95% CI:0-1%)。元回归结果显示,种植体植入后每过一个月,存活率就会显著下降 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03)。骨质增生前后的加权平均牙脊宽度差为 1.55 毫米(95% CI:0.92-2.17 毫米):基于研究的局限性,可以得出结论:就植入种植体的存活率和并发症发生率而言,骨扩张术可被视为一种高效、安全的方法:不详。
Bone expansion as a horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: Bone expansion is one of the quickest, simplest, and most reliable methods of alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement. This systematic review is designed to investigate the outcomes of the bone expansion technique for horizontal ridge augmentation.
Methods: The protocol of study has been prospectively registered into PROSPERO (CRD42023414686). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Human original articles utilizing different bone expansion procedures for horizontal ridge augmentation without the use of bone materials or combined with vertical ridge augmentation techniques were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis have been conducted. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-regression, forest plots random-effect model, and weighted mean difference were used for analysis. Leave-one-out influence analysis for finding outliers. Egger's publication bias test and Funnel plots were used to address publication bias.
Results: 3291 records were identified. Ten articles were included in this study after screening. The survival and complication rates of implants placed simultaneously with bone expansion was 100% 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. The meta-regression revealed that by each month passing from the implant placement the survival probability would be decreased significantly by 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03). The weighted mean ridge width difference before and after the osseodensification was 1.55 mm (95% CI: 0.92-2.17 mm).
Conclusion: Based on the study's limitations it can be concluded that the bone expansion procedure can be considered an efficient and safe method regarding the survival and complication rates of placed implants.
期刊介绍:
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).