基于事件的一致性描述:来自事件文件编码和检索的注意操纵的证据。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1080/00224545.2024.2439946
Ke Ma, Junmei Chi, Bernhard Hommel
{"title":"基于事件的一致性描述:来自事件文件编码和检索的注意操纵的证据。","authors":"Ke Ma, Junmei Chi, Bernhard Hommel","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2024.2439946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous findings have raised doubt in whether comparable conformity effects can be obtained for information from humans and computers or other systems of little or no social importance. In the present study, we compared the impact of \"other choices\" (i.e. choices of another agent that did or did not match the participant's initial choices) of humans and computers on preferences of participants for one of two pictures. In Experiment 1, we found conformity effects only when the other choices came from humans. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the attention allocated to encoding picture-choice combinations by means of a secondary go/nogo task. Conformity effects were found for humans and computers if the secondary task did not require a response. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the attention allocated to retrieving picture-choice combinations, which resulted in conformity effects for all conditions. Taken altogether, our findings suggest that conformity effects can be obtained for \"computerized\" informational sources under attentional conditions that reduce the specificity of encoding or the selectivity of retrieving event files.</p>","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An event-based account of conformity: evidence from attention manipulations targeting event-file encoding and retrieval.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Ma, Junmei Chi, Bernhard Hommel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00224545.2024.2439946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous findings have raised doubt in whether comparable conformity effects can be obtained for information from humans and computers or other systems of little or no social importance. In the present study, we compared the impact of \\\"other choices\\\" (i.e. choices of another agent that did or did not match the participant's initial choices) of humans and computers on preferences of participants for one of two pictures. In Experiment 1, we found conformity effects only when the other choices came from humans. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the attention allocated to encoding picture-choice combinations by means of a secondary go/nogo task. Conformity effects were found for humans and computers if the secondary task did not require a response. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the attention allocated to retrieving picture-choice combinations, which resulted in conformity effects for all conditions. Taken altogether, our findings suggest that conformity effects can be obtained for \\\"computerized\\\" informational sources under attentional conditions that reduce the specificity of encoding or the selectivity of retrieving event files.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2439946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2439946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究结果提出了一个疑问,即从人类、计算机或其他很少或没有社会重要性的系统中获得的信息是否也能产生类似的从众效应。在本研究中,我们比较了人类和计算机的“其他选择”(即与参与者的初始选择匹配或不匹配的另一个代理的选择)对参与者对两张图片之一的偏好的影响。在实验1中,我们发现只有当其他选择来自人类时才会产生从众效应。在实验2中,我们通过第二个go/nogo任务来操纵分配给编码图片选择组合的注意力。如果次要任务不需要回应,那么从众效应就会出现在人类和计算机身上。在实验3中,我们将注意力分配到图片选择组合的检索上,这在所有条件下都产生了从众效应。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,在降低编码的特异性或检索事件文件的选择性的注意条件下,“计算机化”信息源可以获得从众效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An event-based account of conformity: evidence from attention manipulations targeting event-file encoding and retrieval.

Previous findings have raised doubt in whether comparable conformity effects can be obtained for information from humans and computers or other systems of little or no social importance. In the present study, we compared the impact of "other choices" (i.e. choices of another agent that did or did not match the participant's initial choices) of humans and computers on preferences of participants for one of two pictures. In Experiment 1, we found conformity effects only when the other choices came from humans. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the attention allocated to encoding picture-choice combinations by means of a secondary go/nogo task. Conformity effects were found for humans and computers if the secondary task did not require a response. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the attention allocated to retrieving picture-choice combinations, which resulted in conformity effects for all conditions. Taken altogether, our findings suggest that conformity effects can be obtained for "computerized" informational sources under attentional conditions that reduce the specificity of encoding or the selectivity of retrieving event files.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Psychology
Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.
期刊最新文献
Stay hungry for morality: the inhibitory effect of high moral identity and moral elevation on moral licensing. An event-based account of conformity: evidence from attention manipulations targeting event-file encoding and retrieval. Other-oriented emotional intelligence, OCBs, and job performance: a relational perspective. Conspiracy beliefs explain why intolerance of uncertainty, personal control, and political uncontrollability predict willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The association between victims' vulnerable and grandiose narcissism and grudge holding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1