探讨参与者对电子健康干预腰痛和膝骨关节炎的满意度:提高澳大利亚农村物理治疗的可及性。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252
Isabelle Allworth, Georgina Luscombe, Paulo Ferreira, Carlos Mesa-Castrillon
{"title":"探讨参与者对电子健康干预腰痛和膝骨关节炎的满意度:提高澳大利亚农村物理治疗的可及性。","authors":"Isabelle Allworth, Georgina Luscombe, Paulo Ferreira, Carlos Mesa-Castrillon","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accessing health services in rural Australia is challenging and innovative solutions to meet residents' needs are required. Research into eHealth is crucial as it offers potential solutions to these challenges. The study aimed to assess participants' satisfaction and experience with an eHealth physiotherapy intervention at improving physical function for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Telephone surveys collected data on participant satisfaction and experiences. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 0-10, and the data was presented descriptively and compared between groups (eHealth and usual care) using Mann-Whitney U tests. Participant experiences with the pilot trial were gathered using open-ended questions, categorised and presented descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75/156 (48%) participants responded to the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the eHealth group, median = 9 [IQR: 8-10] compared with the usual care group, median = 8 [IQR: 5-9] (p = 0.025). Satisfaction was also significantly higher in the eHealth group for all secondary measures in the study, including accessibility to healthcare practitioner (p = 0.001), time to contact physiotherapist (p = 0.011), cost of intervention (p < 0.001) and distance travelled (p < 0.001). For the pilot experiences, inconvenient aspects such as completing forms/administration and travel were significantly higher in the usual care group, while difficulties with exercises, were significantly higher in the eHealth group (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An eHealth intervention for physiotherapy is acceptable to patients with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain in rural Australia. Future telehealth interventions should pay special attention to participant's exercise workload and motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"76 ","pages":"103252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring participant satisfaction with an eHealth intervention for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: Enhancing physiotherapy access in rural Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Allworth, Georgina Luscombe, Paulo Ferreira, Carlos Mesa-Castrillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accessing health services in rural Australia is challenging and innovative solutions to meet residents' needs are required. Research into eHealth is crucial as it offers potential solutions to these challenges. The study aimed to assess participants' satisfaction and experience with an eHealth physiotherapy intervention at improving physical function for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Telephone surveys collected data on participant satisfaction and experiences. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 0-10, and the data was presented descriptively and compared between groups (eHealth and usual care) using Mann-Whitney U tests. Participant experiences with the pilot trial were gathered using open-ended questions, categorised and presented descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75/156 (48%) participants responded to the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the eHealth group, median = 9 [IQR: 8-10] compared with the usual care group, median = 8 [IQR: 5-9] (p = 0.025). Satisfaction was also significantly higher in the eHealth group for all secondary measures in the study, including accessibility to healthcare practitioner (p = 0.001), time to contact physiotherapist (p = 0.011), cost of intervention (p < 0.001) and distance travelled (p < 0.001). For the pilot experiences, inconvenient aspects such as completing forms/administration and travel were significantly higher in the usual care group, while difficulties with exercises, were significantly higher in the eHealth group (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An eHealth intervention for physiotherapy is acceptable to patients with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain in rural Australia. Future telehealth interventions should pay special attention to participant's exercise workload and motivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"103252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在澳大利亚农村地区获得医疗服务具有挑战性,需要创新的解决方案来满足居民的需求。对电子健康的研究至关重要,因为它为应对这些挑战提供了潜在的解决方案。本研究旨在评估参与者对电子健康理疗干预的满意度和体验,以改善澳大利亚农村地区腰背痛和膝关节骨关节炎患者的身体功能:方法:通过电话调查收集参与者的满意度和体验数据。满意度采用 0-10 分制,数据以描述性方式呈现,并通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验对不同组别(电子保健和常规护理)进行比较。使用开放式问题收集参与者对试点试验的体验,并进行分类和描述性呈现:75/156(48%)名参与者回复了满意度调查。电子保健组的总体满意度(中位数 = 9 [IQR:8-10])明显高于常规护理组(中位数 = 8 [IQR:5-9])(p = 0.025)。在研究的所有次要衡量标准中,电子健康组的满意度也明显更高,这些衡量标准包括医疗从业人员的可及性(p = 0.001)、联系物理治疗师的时间(p = 0.011)、干预成本(p 结论:电子健康组的满意度明显高于常规护理组:澳大利亚农村地区的膝关节骨关节炎和腰痛患者可以接受物理治疗的电子健康干预。未来的远程健康干预应特别关注参与者的运动工作量和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring participant satisfaction with an eHealth intervention for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: Enhancing physiotherapy access in rural Australia.

Introduction: Accessing health services in rural Australia is challenging and innovative solutions to meet residents' needs are required. Research into eHealth is crucial as it offers potential solutions to these challenges. The study aimed to assess participants' satisfaction and experience with an eHealth physiotherapy intervention at improving physical function for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia.

Methods: Telephone surveys collected data on participant satisfaction and experiences. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 0-10, and the data was presented descriptively and compared between groups (eHealth and usual care) using Mann-Whitney U tests. Participant experiences with the pilot trial were gathered using open-ended questions, categorised and presented descriptively.

Results: 75/156 (48%) participants responded to the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the eHealth group, median = 9 [IQR: 8-10] compared with the usual care group, median = 8 [IQR: 5-9] (p = 0.025). Satisfaction was also significantly higher in the eHealth group for all secondary measures in the study, including accessibility to healthcare practitioner (p = 0.001), time to contact physiotherapist (p = 0.011), cost of intervention (p < 0.001) and distance travelled (p < 0.001). For the pilot experiences, inconvenient aspects such as completing forms/administration and travel were significantly higher in the usual care group, while difficulties with exercises, were significantly higher in the eHealth group (p = 0.005).

Conclusions: An eHealth intervention for physiotherapy is acceptable to patients with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain in rural Australia. Future telehealth interventions should pay special attention to participant's exercise workload and motivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
期刊最新文献
Sensorimotor control and neurocognitive performance in musculoskeletal disease and injury control. IFOMPT's Educational Standards and International Monitoring: A member survey and review. The prognostic reasoning by physiotherapists of musculoskeletal disorders: A phenomenological exploratory study. Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory. Do patients with fibromyalgia syndrome receive updated management strategies? A web-based survey among Italian physiotherapists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1