评价包茎中的硬化地衣:来自多学科回顾性研究的见解。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Australasian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1111/ajd.14417
Stefano Bighetti, Stefano Mancon, Nazareno Suardi, Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, Vincenzo Maione, Mariachiara Arisi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicola Zerbinati, Iacopo Ghini, Luca Bettolini
{"title":"评价包茎中的硬化地衣:来自多学科回顾性研究的见解。","authors":"Stefano Bighetti, Stefano Mancon, Nazareno Suardi, Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, Vincenzo Maione, Mariachiara Arisi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicola Zerbinati, Iacopo Ghini, Luca Bettolini","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lichen sclerosus (LS) in male patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, emphasising the significance of a multidisciplinary approach in the early diagnosis and management of this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 841 male patients who underwent circumcision at a high-volume medical centre between 2001 and 2023. Data were collected on clinical diagnoses made by both dermatologists and urologists, along with the corresponding histological findings. Logistic regression models were utilised to assess diagnostic accuracy and the relationship between clinical suspicion and histological confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological confirmation of LS was identified in 30.6% of the cases. Dermatologists demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%, whereas urologists showed an accuracy of 46.1%. The evaluations conducted by dermatologists exhibited a significant correlation with histological confirmation of LS (odds ratio 4.81; 95% confidence interval: 1.96-11.80; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study elucidates the differences in diagnostic accuracy between dermatologists and urologists in identifying LS in patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to improve the diagnostic process. Furthermore, the epidemiological data obtained from this research offer valuable insights into the prevalence of LS and the associated diagnostic challenges within a substantial patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Lichen Sclerosus in Phimosis: Insights From a Multidisciplinary Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Bighetti, Stefano Mancon, Nazareno Suardi, Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, Vincenzo Maione, Mariachiara Arisi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicola Zerbinati, Iacopo Ghini, Luca Bettolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajd.14417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lichen sclerosus (LS) in male patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, emphasising the significance of a multidisciplinary approach in the early diagnosis and management of this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 841 male patients who underwent circumcision at a high-volume medical centre between 2001 and 2023. Data were collected on clinical diagnoses made by both dermatologists and urologists, along with the corresponding histological findings. Logistic regression models were utilised to assess diagnostic accuracy and the relationship between clinical suspicion and histological confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological confirmation of LS was identified in 30.6% of the cases. Dermatologists demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%, whereas urologists showed an accuracy of 46.1%. The evaluations conducted by dermatologists exhibited a significant correlation with histological confirmation of LS (odds ratio 4.81; 95% confidence interval: 1.96-11.80; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study elucidates the differences in diagnostic accuracy between dermatologists and urologists in identifying LS in patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to improve the diagnostic process. Furthermore, the epidemiological data obtained from this research offer valuable insights into the prevalence of LS and the associated diagnostic challenges within a substantial patient cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估因包茎而行包皮环切术的男性患者中硬化地衣(LS)的患病率,强调多学科方法在这种疾病的早期诊断和治疗中的重要性。方法:对2001年至2023年在某大型医疗中心行包皮环切术的841例男性患者进行回顾性分析。收集了皮肤科医生和泌尿科医生的临床诊断数据,以及相应的组织学结果。采用Logistic回归模型评估诊断准确性以及临床怀疑与组织学证实之间的关系。结果:30.6%的病例经组织学证实为LS。皮肤科医生的诊断准确率为81.8%,而泌尿科医生的准确率为46.1%。皮肤科医生进行的评估显示与LS的组织学证实有显著相关性(优势比4.81;95%置信区间:1.96-11.80;p = 0.001)。结论:本研究阐明了皮肤科医生和泌尿科医生在识别包茎包皮环切术患者LS诊断准确性的差异,强调了多学科方法改善诊断过程的必要性。此外,从本研究中获得的流行病学数据为大量患者队列中LS的患病率和相关的诊断挑战提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Lichen Sclerosus in Phimosis: Insights From a Multidisciplinary Retrospective Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lichen sclerosus (LS) in male patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, emphasising the significance of a multidisciplinary approach in the early diagnosis and management of this condition.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 841 male patients who underwent circumcision at a high-volume medical centre between 2001 and 2023. Data were collected on clinical diagnoses made by both dermatologists and urologists, along with the corresponding histological findings. Logistic regression models were utilised to assess diagnostic accuracy and the relationship between clinical suspicion and histological confirmation.

Results: Histological confirmation of LS was identified in 30.6% of the cases. Dermatologists demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%, whereas urologists showed an accuracy of 46.1%. The evaluations conducted by dermatologists exhibited a significant correlation with histological confirmation of LS (odds ratio 4.81; 95% confidence interval: 1.96-11.80; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: This study elucidates the differences in diagnostic accuracy between dermatologists and urologists in identifying LS in patients undergoing circumcision for phimosis, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to improve the diagnostic process. Furthermore, the epidemiological data obtained from this research offer valuable insights into the prevalence of LS and the associated diagnostic challenges within a substantial patient cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
期刊最新文献
Rural Exposure and Future Intent of Australian Dermatology Trainees. Drug Survival of Biological Therapies in Smokers and Non-Smokers With Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the Australasian Psoriasis Registry. Efficacy of Topical Oxytocin With Micro-Needling in the Treatment of Facial Skin Ageing: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Study. From Monotherapy to Adjunctive Therapies: Application of Dermocosmetics in Acne Management Across Australia and New Zealand. Novel Compound Heterozygous Mutations in ILNEB Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1