冠状动脉疾病的运动类型和环境、生活质量和心理健康:一项网络荟萃分析

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae870
Angel Toval, Esmée A Bakker, Joao Bruno Granada-Maia, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Patricio Solis-Urra, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Irene Esteban-Cornejo, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Francisco B Ortega
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病的运动类型和环境、生活质量和心理健康:一项网络荟萃分析","authors":"Angel Toval, Esmée A Bakker, Joao Bruno Granada-Maia, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Patricio Solis-Urra, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Irene Esteban-Cornejo, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Francisco B Ortega","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Individuals with coronary artery disease have poorer mental health, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and cognition compared with (age-matched) controls. Exercise training may attenuate these effects. The aim is to systematically review and meta-analyse the effects of different exercise types and settings on brain structure/function, cognition, HR-QoL, mental health (e.g. depression, anxiety), and sleep in patients with coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted and a network meta-analysis compared (i) exercise types, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), HIIT + resistance (HIIT + R), moderate-intensity training (MIT), MIT + R and stretching-toning-balance training, and (ii) exercise settings, in-person and home-based.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 randomized controlled trials with a parallel group design were identified, of which 36 were included in the meta-analysis. Few studies included cognition (n = 2), sleep (n = 2), and none brain structure/function (n = 0). Most studies examined HR-QoL (n = 30), depression (n = 15), and anxiety (n = 9), in which outcomes were meta-analysed. HIIT + R, HIIT, and MIT were associated with improved HR-QoL vs. no exercise (i.e. usual care) [standardized mean difference, SMD: 1.53 (95% confidence interval 0.83; 2.24), 0.44 (0.15; 0.73), and 0.44 (0.20; 0.67), respectively]. In-person exercise was associated with larger and significant improvements [HR-QoL SMD: 0.51 (0.28; 0.74), depressive SMD: -0.55 (-1.03; -0.07), and anxiety symptoms SMD: -1.16 (-2.05; -0.26)] compared with no exercise, whereas home-based programmes were not significantly associated with improvements in these outcomes. Findings were robust in secondary (i.e. intervention duration and volume) and sensitivity analyses excluding high risk of bias studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise training, especially in-person sessions, was associated with improved HR-QoL, depression and anxiety, independently of exercise type. However, this study raises concern about the effectiveness of home-based programmes in improving these outcomes.Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023402569).</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise type and settings, quality of life, and mental health in coronary artery disease: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Angel Toval, Esmée A Bakker, Joao Bruno Granada-Maia, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Patricio Solis-Urra, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Irene Esteban-Cornejo, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Francisco B Ortega\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Individuals with coronary artery disease have poorer mental health, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and cognition compared with (age-matched) controls. Exercise training may attenuate these effects. The aim is to systematically review and meta-analyse the effects of different exercise types and settings on brain structure/function, cognition, HR-QoL, mental health (e.g. depression, anxiety), and sleep in patients with coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted and a network meta-analysis compared (i) exercise types, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), HIIT + resistance (HIIT + R), moderate-intensity training (MIT), MIT + R and stretching-toning-balance training, and (ii) exercise settings, in-person and home-based.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 randomized controlled trials with a parallel group design were identified, of which 36 were included in the meta-analysis. Few studies included cognition (n = 2), sleep (n = 2), and none brain structure/function (n = 0). Most studies examined HR-QoL (n = 30), depression (n = 15), and anxiety (n = 9), in which outcomes were meta-analysed. HIIT + R, HIIT, and MIT were associated with improved HR-QoL vs. no exercise (i.e. usual care) [standardized mean difference, SMD: 1.53 (95% confidence interval 0.83; 2.24), 0.44 (0.15; 0.73), and 0.44 (0.20; 0.67), respectively]. In-person exercise was associated with larger and significant improvements [HR-QoL SMD: 0.51 (0.28; 0.74), depressive SMD: -0.55 (-1.03; -0.07), and anxiety symptoms SMD: -1.16 (-2.05; -0.26)] compared with no exercise, whereas home-based programmes were not significantly associated with improvements in these outcomes. Findings were robust in secondary (i.e. intervention duration and volume) and sensitivity analyses excluding high risk of bias studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise training, especially in-person sessions, was associated with improved HR-QoL, depression and anxiety, independently of exercise type. However, this study raises concern about the effectiveness of home-based programmes in improving these outcomes.Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023402569).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":37.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae870\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:冠状动脉疾病患者的心理健康、健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)和认知能力较(年龄匹配)对照组差。运动训练可以减轻这些影响。目的是系统回顾和荟萃分析不同运动类型和设置对冠状动脉疾病患者大脑结构/功能、认知、HR-QoL、心理健康(如抑郁、焦虑)和睡眠的影响。方法:进行系统检索和网络荟萃分析,比较(i)运动类型,高强度间歇训练(HIIT), HIIT +阻力训练(HIIT + R),中等强度训练(MIT), MIT + R和拉伸-拉伸-平衡训练,以及(ii)运动设置,面对面和家庭基础。结果:共纳入42项采用平行组设计的随机对照试验,其中36项纳入meta分析。少数研究包括认知(n = 2)、睡眠(n = 2)和无大脑结构/功能(n = 0)。大多数研究检查了HR-QoL (n = 30)、抑郁(n = 15)和焦虑(n = 9),其中的结果进行了meta分析。HIIT + R、HIIT和MIT与没有运动(即常规护理)的HR-QoL改善相关[标准化平均差,SMD: 1.53(95%可信区间0.83;2.24), 0.44 (0.15;0.73), 0.44 (0.20;0.67),分别)。亲自锻炼与更大且显著的改善相关[HR-QoL SMD: 0.51 (0.28;0.74),抑郁SMD: -0.55 (-1.03;焦虑症状SMD: -1.16 (-2.05;(-0.26)]与不锻炼相比,而以家庭为基础的项目与这些结果的改善没有显著相关。在次要分析(即干预持续时间和数量)和敏感性分析中,排除了高风险偏倚研究,研究结果是稳健的。结论:运动训练,尤其是面对面的训练,与改善的HR-QoL、抑郁和焦虑有关,与运动类型无关。然而,这项研究引起了人们对以家庭为基础的项目在改善这些结果方面的有效性的关注。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD42023402569)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exercise type and settings, quality of life, and mental health in coronary artery disease: a network meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Individuals with coronary artery disease have poorer mental health, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and cognition compared with (age-matched) controls. Exercise training may attenuate these effects. The aim is to systematically review and meta-analyse the effects of different exercise types and settings on brain structure/function, cognition, HR-QoL, mental health (e.g. depression, anxiety), and sleep in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted and a network meta-analysis compared (i) exercise types, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), HIIT + resistance (HIIT + R), moderate-intensity training (MIT), MIT + R and stretching-toning-balance training, and (ii) exercise settings, in-person and home-based.

Results: A total of 42 randomized controlled trials with a parallel group design were identified, of which 36 were included in the meta-analysis. Few studies included cognition (n = 2), sleep (n = 2), and none brain structure/function (n = 0). Most studies examined HR-QoL (n = 30), depression (n = 15), and anxiety (n = 9), in which outcomes were meta-analysed. HIIT + R, HIIT, and MIT were associated with improved HR-QoL vs. no exercise (i.e. usual care) [standardized mean difference, SMD: 1.53 (95% confidence interval 0.83; 2.24), 0.44 (0.15; 0.73), and 0.44 (0.20; 0.67), respectively]. In-person exercise was associated with larger and significant improvements [HR-QoL SMD: 0.51 (0.28; 0.74), depressive SMD: -0.55 (-1.03; -0.07), and anxiety symptoms SMD: -1.16 (-2.05; -0.26)] compared with no exercise, whereas home-based programmes were not significantly associated with improvements in these outcomes. Findings were robust in secondary (i.e. intervention duration and volume) and sensitivity analyses excluding high risk of bias studies.

Conclusions: Exercise training, especially in-person sessions, was associated with improved HR-QoL, depression and anxiety, independently of exercise type. However, this study raises concern about the effectiveness of home-based programmes in improving these outcomes.Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023402569).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores for predicting cardiovascular disease Anaemia predicts iron homoeostasis dysregulation and modulates the response to empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the EMPATROPISM-FE trial. Anaemia, neurohormonal activation, and myocardial iron depletion in heart failure: can this vicious circle be broken? Cardiac biomarkers for diagnosing Takotsubo syndrome: keep it simple? Microvascular resistance reserve: impact on health status and myocardial perfusion after revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1