保留生育咨询和实践的妇女淋巴瘤:一项回顾性研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2025.2449679
Mariola Hernández Martínez, César Lizán Tudela, Blanca Carreras Gamón, Laura Gregori Navarro
{"title":"保留生育咨询和实践的妇女淋巴瘤:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Mariola Hernández Martínez, César Lizán Tudela, Blanca Carreras Gamón, Laura Gregori Navarro","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2449679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma is very limited. We aimed to assess the receipt of fertility preservation information and use of fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-centre study. Patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were screened from the electronic medical records of individuals who attended the Haematology Department at the study site between 2000 and 2018 and were followed-up for obstetric outcomes and onset of menopause until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients had available electronic health records. Overall, 13 (36.1%) of the 36 patients ≤45 years old received fertility preservation counselling; it was more frequent among nulliparous women (11/23, 47.8%), women aged ≤35 years (11/26, 42.3%), and those diagnosed in the latest study period from 2015 to 2018 (9/16, 56.3%). Of the 13 patients who were informed about fertility preservation, 2 patients refused this intervention, and fertility preservation was contraindicated for 3 patients, leading to a total of eight women who underwent fertility preservation strategies: six underwent ovarian cortex cryopreservation, and two underwent oocyte vitrification. Among the participants aged ≤45 years, 10 (27.8%) had at least one live birth after diagnosis. Fifteen (34.9%) of the 43 participants exhibited amenorrhoea after the initiation of chemotherapy, including 4 women ≤35 years of age. The median (range) age at menopause in this series was 45 (27-50) years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the situation appears to have improved in recent years, we are far from reaching the target of all women with lymphoma who are of reproductive age receiving fertility preservation counselling before initiating chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2449679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertility preservation counselling and practice among women with lymphomas: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Mariola Hernández Martínez, César Lizán Tudela, Blanca Carreras Gamón, Laura Gregori Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01443615.2025.2449679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma is very limited. We aimed to assess the receipt of fertility preservation information and use of fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-centre study. Patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were screened from the electronic medical records of individuals who attended the Haematology Department at the study site between 2000 and 2018 and were followed-up for obstetric outcomes and onset of menopause until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients had available electronic health records. Overall, 13 (36.1%) of the 36 patients ≤45 years old received fertility preservation counselling; it was more frequent among nulliparous women (11/23, 47.8%), women aged ≤35 years (11/26, 42.3%), and those diagnosed in the latest study period from 2015 to 2018 (9/16, 56.3%). Of the 13 patients who were informed about fertility preservation, 2 patients refused this intervention, and fertility preservation was contraindicated for 3 patients, leading to a total of eight women who underwent fertility preservation strategies: six underwent ovarian cortex cryopreservation, and two underwent oocyte vitrification. Among the participants aged ≤45 years, 10 (27.8%) had at least one live birth after diagnosis. Fifteen (34.9%) of the 43 participants exhibited amenorrhoea after the initiation of chemotherapy, including 4 women ≤35 years of age. The median (range) age at menopause in this series was 45 (27-50) years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the situation appears to have improved in recent years, we are far from reaching the target of all women with lymphoma who are of reproductive age receiving fertility preservation counselling before initiating chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"2449679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2449679\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2449679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对诊断为淋巴瘤的妇女保留生育能力的研究非常有限。我们的目的是评估接受生育保存信息和使用生育保存在诊断为淋巴瘤的妇女。方法:这是一项回顾性的单中心研究。从2000年至2018年期间在研究地点血液科就诊的个人的电子病历中筛选霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,并随访产科结局和绝经时间,直到2023年12月。结果:43例患者有电子病历。总体而言,36例≤45岁的患者中有13例(36.1%)接受了生育保留咨询;未生育妇女(11/23,47.8%)、年龄≤35岁妇女(11/26,42.3%)和2015 - 2018年最新研究期间确诊的妇女(9/16,56.3%)中发病率较高。在被告知保留生育能力的13例患者中,2例患者拒绝干预,3例患者忌证保留生育能力,导致8例女性采取保留生育能力策略:6例接受卵巢皮质冷冻保存,2例接受卵母细胞玻璃化。在年龄≤45岁的参与者中,10人(27.8%)在诊断后至少有一次活产。43例患者化疗开始后出现闭经15例(34.9%),其中年龄≤35岁的女性4例。绝经年龄中位数(范围)为45岁(27-50岁)。结论:尽管近年来情况似乎有所改善,但我们远未达到所有育龄淋巴瘤妇女在开始化疗前接受生育保留咨询的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fertility preservation counselling and practice among women with lymphomas: a retrospective study.

Background: Research on fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma is very limited. We aimed to assess the receipt of fertility preservation information and use of fertility preservation among women diagnosed with lymphoma.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-centre study. Patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were screened from the electronic medical records of individuals who attended the Haematology Department at the study site between 2000 and 2018 and were followed-up for obstetric outcomes and onset of menopause until December 2023.

Results: Forty-three patients had available electronic health records. Overall, 13 (36.1%) of the 36 patients ≤45 years old received fertility preservation counselling; it was more frequent among nulliparous women (11/23, 47.8%), women aged ≤35 years (11/26, 42.3%), and those diagnosed in the latest study period from 2015 to 2018 (9/16, 56.3%). Of the 13 patients who were informed about fertility preservation, 2 patients refused this intervention, and fertility preservation was contraindicated for 3 patients, leading to a total of eight women who underwent fertility preservation strategies: six underwent ovarian cortex cryopreservation, and two underwent oocyte vitrification. Among the participants aged ≤45 years, 10 (27.8%) had at least one live birth after diagnosis. Fifteen (34.9%) of the 43 participants exhibited amenorrhoea after the initiation of chemotherapy, including 4 women ≤35 years of age. The median (range) age at menopause in this series was 45 (27-50) years.

Conclusion: Even though the situation appears to have improved in recent years, we are far from reaching the target of all women with lymphoma who are of reproductive age receiving fertility preservation counselling before initiating chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study of WeChat app-based health management for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Comparison of the efficacy of vaginal micronised progesterone tablet and gel for in vitro fertilisation. Therapeutic strategies to prolong gestation in preterm preeclampsia. Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) cessation on trigger day in a GnRH-ant protocol: a meta-analysis. Enhancing postpartum hemorrhage training by integrating case-problem based learning with simulation: a quasi experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1