{"title":"美国眼眶和隔膜前蜂窝织炎的流行病学:一项13年的分析。","authors":"Shazia Dharssi, Kamil Taneja, Fatemeh Rajaii","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2443541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence rates, risk factors, and economic burden of orbital and preseptal cellulitis in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study was completed using data from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample dataset. An estimated 732,105 emergency department (ED) visits with a primary or secondary diagnosis of orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 were included. Incidence rates, descriptive statistics, and risk factors were calculated using linear and multivariate logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates of preseptal cellulitis increased from 6.2 in 2006 to 19.2 per 100,000 US population in 2018. In contrast, orbital cellulitis incidence rates have been decreasing from 6.1 to 2.8 per 100,000 US population from 2006 to 2018, respectively. Young adults (ages 21-44) comprise a majority of patients with either preseptal or orbital cellulitis (31.7%; 95% CI, 30.5-33.0%). Hypertension (11.8%, 12.9%), tobacco use (11.2%, 9.6%), and sinusitis (9.2%, 4.3%) were the most commonly associated diagnoses for orbital and preseptal cellulitis, respectively. Only 27.6% of patients with orbital cellulitis were admitted with 64.7% of patients routinely discharged. The inflation-adjusted ED charges for patients with orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 totalled over $997 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orbital and preseptal cellulitis are costly infections in the US with increasing incidence rates for preseptal cellulitis. High rates of routine discharge from the ED for orbital cellulitis may represent a knowledge gap amongst providers and an opportunity to improve care. Identifying individuals at risk for infection is key for diagnosis and appropriate triage of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of Orbital and Preseptal Cellulitis in the United States: A 13-Year Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shazia Dharssi, Kamil Taneja, Fatemeh Rajaii\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2024.2443541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence rates, risk factors, and economic burden of orbital and preseptal cellulitis in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study was completed using data from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample dataset. An estimated 732,105 emergency department (ED) visits with a primary or secondary diagnosis of orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 were included. Incidence rates, descriptive statistics, and risk factors were calculated using linear and multivariate logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates of preseptal cellulitis increased from 6.2 in 2006 to 19.2 per 100,000 US population in 2018. In contrast, orbital cellulitis incidence rates have been decreasing from 6.1 to 2.8 per 100,000 US population from 2006 to 2018, respectively. Young adults (ages 21-44) comprise a majority of patients with either preseptal or orbital cellulitis (31.7%; 95% CI, 30.5-33.0%). Hypertension (11.8%, 12.9%), tobacco use (11.2%, 9.6%), and sinusitis (9.2%, 4.3%) were the most commonly associated diagnoses for orbital and preseptal cellulitis, respectively. Only 27.6% of patients with orbital cellulitis were admitted with 64.7% of patients routinely discharged. The inflation-adjusted ED charges for patients with orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 totalled over $997 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orbital and preseptal cellulitis are costly infections in the US with increasing incidence rates for preseptal cellulitis. High rates of routine discharge from the ED for orbital cellulitis may represent a knowledge gap amongst providers and an opportunity to improve care. Identifying individuals at risk for infection is key for diagnosis and appropriate triage of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2443541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2443541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epidemiology of Orbital and Preseptal Cellulitis in the United States: A 13-Year Analysis.
Purpose: To determine the incidence rates, risk factors, and economic burden of orbital and preseptal cellulitis in the United States (US).
Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study was completed using data from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample dataset. An estimated 732,105 emergency department (ED) visits with a primary or secondary diagnosis of orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 were included. Incidence rates, descriptive statistics, and risk factors were calculated using linear and multivariate logistic regression models.
Results: The incidence rates of preseptal cellulitis increased from 6.2 in 2006 to 19.2 per 100,000 US population in 2018. In contrast, orbital cellulitis incidence rates have been decreasing from 6.1 to 2.8 per 100,000 US population from 2006 to 2018, respectively. Young adults (ages 21-44) comprise a majority of patients with either preseptal or orbital cellulitis (31.7%; 95% CI, 30.5-33.0%). Hypertension (11.8%, 12.9%), tobacco use (11.2%, 9.6%), and sinusitis (9.2%, 4.3%) were the most commonly associated diagnoses for orbital and preseptal cellulitis, respectively. Only 27.6% of patients with orbital cellulitis were admitted with 64.7% of patients routinely discharged. The inflation-adjusted ED charges for patients with orbital and preseptal cellulitis from 2006 to 2018 totalled over $997 million.
Conclusion: Orbital and preseptal cellulitis are costly infections in the US with increasing incidence rates for preseptal cellulitis. High rates of routine discharge from the ED for orbital cellulitis may represent a knowledge gap amongst providers and an opportunity to improve care. Identifying individuals at risk for infection is key for diagnosis and appropriate triage of care.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.