连续协变量具有正违反的可运性的综合估计。

IF 1.5 3区 数学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jrsssa/qnae084
Paul N Zivich, Jessie K Edwards, Bonnie E Shook-Sa, Eric T Lofgren, Justin Lessler, Stephen R Cole
{"title":"连续协变量具有正违反的可运性的综合估计。","authors":"Paul N Zivich, Jessie K Edwards, Bonnie E Shook-Sa, Eric T Lofgren, Justin Lessler, Stephen R Cole","doi":"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies intended to estimate the effect of a treatment, like randomized trials, may not be sampled from the desired target population. To correct for this discrepancy, estimates can be transported to the target population. Methods for transporting between populations are often premised on a positivity assumption, such that all relevant covariate patterns in one population are also present in the other. However, eligibility criteria, particularly in the case of trials, can result in violations of positivity when transporting to external populations. To address nonpositivity, a synthesis of statistical and mathematical models can be considered. This approach integrates multiple data sources (e.g. trials, observational, pharmacokinetic studies) to estimate treatment effects, leveraging mathematical models to handle positivity violations. This approach was previously demonstrated for positivity violations by a single binary covariate. Here, we extend the synthesis approach for positivity violations with a continuous covariate. For estimation, two novel augmented inverse probability weighting estimators are proposed. Both estimators are contrasted with other common approaches for addressing nonpositivity. Empirical performance is compared via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, the competing approaches are illustrated with an example in the context of two-drug vs. one-drug antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cell counts among women with HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":49983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","volume":"188 1","pages":"158-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesis estimators for transportability with positivity violations by a continuous covariate.\",\"authors\":\"Paul N Zivich, Jessie K Edwards, Bonnie E Shook-Sa, Eric T Lofgren, Justin Lessler, Stephen R Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies intended to estimate the effect of a treatment, like randomized trials, may not be sampled from the desired target population. To correct for this discrepancy, estimates can be transported to the target population. Methods for transporting between populations are often premised on a positivity assumption, such that all relevant covariate patterns in one population are also present in the other. However, eligibility criteria, particularly in the case of trials, can result in violations of positivity when transporting to external populations. To address nonpositivity, a synthesis of statistical and mathematical models can be considered. This approach integrates multiple data sources (e.g. trials, observational, pharmacokinetic studies) to estimate treatment effects, leveraging mathematical models to handle positivity violations. This approach was previously demonstrated for positivity violations by a single binary covariate. Here, we extend the synthesis approach for positivity violations with a continuous covariate. For estimation, two novel augmented inverse probability weighting estimators are proposed. Both estimators are contrasted with other common approaches for addressing nonpositivity. Empirical performance is compared via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, the competing approaches are illustrated with an example in the context of two-drug vs. one-drug antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cell counts among women with HIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"volume\":\"188 1\",\"pages\":\"158-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在评估治疗效果的研究,如随机试验,可能不会从预期的目标人群中取样。为了纠正这种差异,可以将估计值传递给目标人群。种群间迁移的方法通常以正假设为前提,即一个种群中的所有相关协变量模式也存在于另一个种群中。但是,资格标准,特别是在试验的情况下,可能导致在向外部人口运送时违反阳性。为了解决非正性,可以考虑综合统计和数学模型。这种方法整合了多种数据来源(如试验、观察、药代动力学研究)来估计治疗效果,利用数学模型来处理阳性违规行为。这种方法以前被证明是由一个单一的二进制协变量的正违规。在这里,我们扩展了具有连续协变量的正违反的综合方法。在估计方面,提出了两种新的增广逆概率加权估计。这两种估计都与其他处理非正性的常用方法进行了对比。通过蒙特卡罗仿真比较了经验性能。最后,以双药与单药抗逆转录病毒治疗对感染艾滋病毒的妇女CD4 T细胞计数的影响为例,说明了相互竞争的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthesis estimators for transportability with positivity violations by a continuous covariate.

Studies intended to estimate the effect of a treatment, like randomized trials, may not be sampled from the desired target population. To correct for this discrepancy, estimates can be transported to the target population. Methods for transporting between populations are often premised on a positivity assumption, such that all relevant covariate patterns in one population are also present in the other. However, eligibility criteria, particularly in the case of trials, can result in violations of positivity when transporting to external populations. To address nonpositivity, a synthesis of statistical and mathematical models can be considered. This approach integrates multiple data sources (e.g. trials, observational, pharmacokinetic studies) to estimate treatment effects, leveraging mathematical models to handle positivity violations. This approach was previously demonstrated for positivity violations by a single binary covariate. Here, we extend the synthesis approach for positivity violations with a continuous covariate. For estimation, two novel augmented inverse probability weighting estimators are proposed. Both estimators are contrasted with other common approaches for addressing nonpositivity. Empirical performance is compared via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, the competing approaches are illustrated with an example in the context of two-drug vs. one-drug antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cell counts among women with HIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Series A (Statistics in Society) publishes high quality papers that demonstrate how statistical thinking, design and analyses play a vital role in all walks of life and benefit society in general. There is no restriction on subject-matter: any interesting, topical and revelatory applications of statistics are welcome. For example, important applications of statistical and related data science methodology in medicine, business and commerce, industry, economics and finance, education and teaching, physical and biomedical sciences, the environment, the law, government and politics, demography, psychology, sociology and sport all fall within the journal''s remit. The journal is therefore aimed at a wide statistical audience and at professional statisticians in particular. Its emphasis is on well-written and clearly reasoned quantitative approaches to problems in the real world rather than the exposition of technical detail. Thus, although the methodological basis of papers must be sound and adequately explained, methodology per se should not be the main focus of a Series A paper. Of particular interest are papers on topical or contentious statistical issues, papers which give reviews or exposés of current statistical concerns and papers which demonstrate how appropriate statistical thinking has contributed to our understanding of important substantive questions. Historical, professional and biographical contributions are also welcome, as are discussions of methods of data collection and of ethical issues, provided that all such papers have substantial statistical relevance.
期刊最新文献
Studying Chinese immigrants' spatial distribution in the Raleigh-Durham area by linking survey and commercial data using romanized names. A comparison of some existing and novel methods for integrating historical models to improve estimation of coefficients in logistic regression. Synthesis estimators for transportability with positivity violations by a continuous covariate. Data-integration with pseudoweights and survey-calibration: application to developing US-representative lung cancer risk models for use in screening. A framework for understanding selection bias in real-world healthcare data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1