利用检索增强生成改进大型语言模型在生物医学中的应用:系统回顾、荟萃分析和临床开发指南。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaf008
Siru Liu, Allison B McCoy, Adam Wright
{"title":"利用检索增强生成改进大型语言模型在生物医学中的应用:系统回顾、荟萃分析和临床开发指南。","authors":"Siru Liu, Allison B McCoy, Adam Wright","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study are to synthesize findings from recent research of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and large language models (LLMs) in biomedicine and provide clinical development guidelines to improve effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. The report was created in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 analysis. Searches were performed in 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO) using terms related to \"retrieval augmented generation\" and \"large language model,\" for articles published in 2023 and 2024. We selected studies that compared baseline LLM performance with RAG performance. We developed a random-effect meta-analysis model, using odds ratio as the effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 335 studies, 20 were included in this literature review. The pooled effect size was 1.35, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.19-1.53, indicating a statistically significant effect (P = .001). We reported clinical tasks, baseline LLMs, retrieval sources and strategies, as well as evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building on our literature review, we developed Guidelines for Unified Implementation and Development of Enhanced LLM Applications with RAG in Clinical Settings to inform clinical applications using RAG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, RAG implementation showed a 1.35 odds ratio increase in performance compared to baseline LLMs. Future research should focus on (1) system-level enhancement: the combination of RAG and agent, (2) knowledge-level enhancement: deep integration of knowledge into LLM, and (3) integration-level enhancement: integrating RAG systems within electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving large language model applications in biomedicine with retrieval-augmented generation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical development guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Siru Liu, Allison B McCoy, Adam Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study are to synthesize findings from recent research of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and large language models (LLMs) in biomedicine and provide clinical development guidelines to improve effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. The report was created in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 analysis. Searches were performed in 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO) using terms related to \\\"retrieval augmented generation\\\" and \\\"large language model,\\\" for articles published in 2023 and 2024. We selected studies that compared baseline LLM performance with RAG performance. We developed a random-effect meta-analysis model, using odds ratio as the effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 335 studies, 20 were included in this literature review. The pooled effect size was 1.35, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.19-1.53, indicating a statistically significant effect (P = .001). We reported clinical tasks, baseline LLMs, retrieval sources and strategies, as well as evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building on our literature review, we developed Guidelines for Unified Implementation and Development of Enhanced LLM Applications with RAG in Clinical Settings to inform clinical applications using RAG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, RAG implementation showed a 1.35 odds ratio increase in performance compared to baseline LLMs. Future research should focus on (1) system-level enhancement: the combination of RAG and agent, (2) knowledge-level enhancement: deep integration of knowledge into LLM, and (3) integration-level enhancement: integrating RAG systems within electronic health records.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综合近年来检索增强生成(retrieval-augmented generation, RAG)和大型语言模型(large language models, LLMs)在生物医学领域的研究成果,为临床开发提供指导。材料和方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。该报告是根据2020年系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目创建的。在3个数据库(PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO)中使用与“检索增强生成”和“大型语言模型”相关的术语对2023年和2024年发表的文章进行了搜索。我们选择了比较基线LLM性能和RAG性能的研究。我们开发了一个随机效应荟萃分析模型,使用优势比作为效应大小。结果:在335项研究中,本文献综述纳入20项。合并效应量为1.35,95%置信区间为1.19 ~ 1.53,具有统计学意义(P = .001)。我们报告了临床任务、基线llm、检索来源和策略以及评估方法。讨论:基于我们的文献综述,我们制定了在临床环境中使用RAG统一实施和开发增强LLM应用的指南,以告知使用RAG的临床应用。结论:总体而言,与基线llm相比,RAG的实施表现出1.35的优势比提高。未来的研究应侧重于(1)系统级增强:RAG与agent的结合;(2)知识级增强:将知识深度集成到LLM中;(3)集成级增强:将RAG系统集成到电子健康记录中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving large language model applications in biomedicine with retrieval-augmented generation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical development guidelines.

Objective: The objectives of this study are to synthesize findings from recent research of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and large language models (LLMs) in biomedicine and provide clinical development guidelines to improve effectiveness.

Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. The report was created in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 analysis. Searches were performed in 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO) using terms related to "retrieval augmented generation" and "large language model," for articles published in 2023 and 2024. We selected studies that compared baseline LLM performance with RAG performance. We developed a random-effect meta-analysis model, using odds ratio as the effect size.

Results: Among 335 studies, 20 were included in this literature review. The pooled effect size was 1.35, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.19-1.53, indicating a statistically significant effect (P = .001). We reported clinical tasks, baseline LLMs, retrieval sources and strategies, as well as evaluation methods.

Discussion: Building on our literature review, we developed Guidelines for Unified Implementation and Development of Enhanced LLM Applications with RAG in Clinical Settings to inform clinical applications using RAG.

Conclusion: Overall, RAG implementation showed a 1.35 odds ratio increase in performance compared to baseline LLMs. Future research should focus on (1) system-level enhancement: the combination of RAG and agent, (2) knowledge-level enhancement: deep integration of knowledge into LLM, and (3) integration-level enhancement: integrating RAG systems within electronic health records.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of the mLab App: a randomized clinical trial for increasing HIV testing uptake using mobile technology. Using human factors methods to mitigate bias in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. Distributed, immutable, and transparent biomedical limited data set request management on multi-capacity network. Identifying stigmatizing and positive/preferred language in obstetric clinical notes using natural language processing. National COVID Cohort Collaborative data enhancements: a path for expanding common data models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1