深度学习的传感器融合增强了婴儿运动分类。

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00701-w
Tomas Kulvicius, Dajie Zhang, Luise Poustka, Sven Bölte, Lennart Jahn, Sarah Flügge, Marc Kraft, Markus Zweckstetter, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Florentin Wörgötter, Peter B Marschik
{"title":"深度学习的传感器融合增强了婴儿运动分类。","authors":"Tomas Kulvicius, Dajie Zhang, Luise Poustka, Sven Bölte, Lennart Jahn, Sarah Flügge, Marc Kraft, Markus Zweckstetter, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Florentin Wörgötter, Peter B Marschik","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00701-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the integrity of the developing nervous system, the Prechtl general movement assessment (GMA) is recognized for its clinical value in diagnosing neurological impairments in early infancy. GMA has been increasingly augmented through machine learning approaches intending to scale-up its application, circumvent costs in the training of human assessors and further standardize classification of spontaneous motor patterns. Available deep learning tools, all of which are based on single sensor modalities, are however still considerably inferior to that of well-trained human assessors. These approaches are hardly comparable as all models are designed, trained and evaluated on proprietary/silo-data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With this study we propose a sensor fusion approach for assessing fidgety movements (FMs). FMs were recorded from 51 typically developing participants. We compared three different sensor modalities (pressure, inertial, and visual sensors). Various combinations and two sensor fusion approaches (late and early fusion) for infant movement classification were tested to evaluate whether a multi-sensor system outperforms single modality assessments. Convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were used to classify movement patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the three-sensor fusion (classification accuracy of 94.5%) is significantly higher than that of any single modality evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show that the sensor fusion approach is a promising avenue for automated classification of infant motor patterns. The development of a robust sensor fusion system may significantly enhance AI-based early recognition of neurofunctions, ultimately facilitating automated early detection of neurodevelopmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning empowered sensor fusion boosts infant movement classification.\",\"authors\":\"Tomas Kulvicius, Dajie Zhang, Luise Poustka, Sven Bölte, Lennart Jahn, Sarah Flügge, Marc Kraft, Markus Zweckstetter, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Florentin Wörgötter, Peter B Marschik\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00701-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the integrity of the developing nervous system, the Prechtl general movement assessment (GMA) is recognized for its clinical value in diagnosing neurological impairments in early infancy. GMA has been increasingly augmented through machine learning approaches intending to scale-up its application, circumvent costs in the training of human assessors and further standardize classification of spontaneous motor patterns. Available deep learning tools, all of which are based on single sensor modalities, are however still considerably inferior to that of well-trained human assessors. These approaches are hardly comparable as all models are designed, trained and evaluated on proprietary/silo-data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With this study we propose a sensor fusion approach for assessing fidgety movements (FMs). FMs were recorded from 51 typically developing participants. We compared three different sensor modalities (pressure, inertial, and visual sensors). Various combinations and two sensor fusion approaches (late and early fusion) for infant movement classification were tested to evaluate whether a multi-sensor system outperforms single modality assessments. Convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were used to classify movement patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the three-sensor fusion (classification accuracy of 94.5%) is significantly higher than that of any single modality evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show that the sensor fusion approach is a promising avenue for automated classification of infant motor patterns. The development of a robust sensor fusion system may significantly enhance AI-based early recognition of neurofunctions, ultimately facilitating automated early detection of neurodevelopmental conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00701-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00701-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了评估发育中的神经系统的完整性,Prechtl一般运动评估(GMA)被认为在诊断早期婴儿神经损伤方面具有临床价值。通过机器学习方法,GMA已经得到了越来越多的增强,这些方法旨在扩大其应用范围,规避人类评估员培训的成本,并进一步标准化自发运动模式的分类。然而,现有的深度学习工具都是基于单一传感器模式的,与训练有素的人类评估人员相比,它们仍然相当逊色。这些方法几乎没有可比性,因为所有模型都是在专有/孤岛数据集上设计、训练和评估的。方法:在这项研究中,我们提出了一种传感器融合方法来评估烦躁运动(FMs)。记录了51名典型发展参与者的FMs。我们比较了三种不同的传感器模式(压力、惯性和视觉传感器)。对婴儿运动分类的各种组合和两种传感器融合方法(后期和早期融合)进行了测试,以评估多传感器系统是否优于单模态评估。使用卷积神经网络(CNN)架构对运动模式进行分类。结果:三传感器融合的分类准确率为94.5%,明显高于任何一种评估的单一模式。结论:我们表明,传感器融合方法是一个有前途的途径,自动分类婴儿运动模式。鲁棒传感器融合系统的发展可能会显著增强基于人工智能的神经功能早期识别,最终促进神经发育状况的自动化早期检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning empowered sensor fusion boosts infant movement classification.

Background: To assess the integrity of the developing nervous system, the Prechtl general movement assessment (GMA) is recognized for its clinical value in diagnosing neurological impairments in early infancy. GMA has been increasingly augmented through machine learning approaches intending to scale-up its application, circumvent costs in the training of human assessors and further standardize classification of spontaneous motor patterns. Available deep learning tools, all of which are based on single sensor modalities, are however still considerably inferior to that of well-trained human assessors. These approaches are hardly comparable as all models are designed, trained and evaluated on proprietary/silo-data sets.

Methods: With this study we propose a sensor fusion approach for assessing fidgety movements (FMs). FMs were recorded from 51 typically developing participants. We compared three different sensor modalities (pressure, inertial, and visual sensors). Various combinations and two sensor fusion approaches (late and early fusion) for infant movement classification were tested to evaluate whether a multi-sensor system outperforms single modality assessments. Convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were used to classify movement patterns.

Results: The performance of the three-sensor fusion (classification accuracy of 94.5%) is significantly higher than that of any single modality evaluated.

Conclusions: We show that the sensor fusion approach is a promising avenue for automated classification of infant motor patterns. The development of a robust sensor fusion system may significantly enhance AI-based early recognition of neurofunctions, ultimately facilitating automated early detection of neurodevelopmental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lactation duration and ischemic heart disease among parous postmenopausal females from a prospective cohort study. Vaccination for prevention of hearing loss: a scoping review. A one health approach to improve the safety of traditional yak blood drinking in Nepal. H105A peptide eye drops promote photoreceptor survival in murine and human models of retinal degeneration. The use of SatScan software to map spatiotemporal trends and detect disease clusters: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1