达拉单抗联合来那度胺/地塞米松治疗未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤:MAIA研究的关键亚组分析

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1
Philippe Moreau, Thierry Facon, Saad Z. Usmani, Nizar Bahlis, Noopur Raje, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Supratik Basu, Hareth Nahi, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Christopher P. Venner, Katja Weisel, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar
{"title":"达拉单抗联合来那度胺/地塞米松治疗未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤:MAIA研究的关键亚组分析","authors":"Philippe Moreau, Thierry Facon, Saad Z. Usmani, Nizar Bahlis, Noopur Raje, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Supratik Basu, Hareth Nahi, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Christopher P. Venner, Katja Weisel, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the MAIA study (median follow-up, 56.2 months), daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In this post hoc analysis of clinically important subgroups in MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and measurable residual disease (MRD)–negativity rate (10<sup>–5</sup>). PFS favored D-Rd versus Rd in most subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.79), frail patients (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.85), patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.80), and patients with isolated gain(1q21) (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.67). ORRs, MRD-negativity rates, and sustained (≥12 months) MRD-negativity rates were higher with D-Rd versus Rd across subgroups. In patients aged ≥75 years, rates of grade 3/4 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar for D-Rd and Rd, but discontinuation due to TEAEs was lower for D-Rd. Results support use of D-Rd for high-risk patients, supporting D-Rd as a standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02252172.</p><figure></figure>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in untreated multiple myeloma: analysis of key subgroups of the MAIA study\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Moreau, Thierry Facon, Saad Z. Usmani, Nizar Bahlis, Noopur Raje, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Supratik Basu, Hareth Nahi, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Christopher P. Venner, Katja Weisel, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the MAIA study (median follow-up, 56.2 months), daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In this post hoc analysis of clinically important subgroups in MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and measurable residual disease (MRD)–negativity rate (10<sup>–5</sup>). PFS favored D-Rd versus Rd in most subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.79), frail patients (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.85), patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.80), and patients with isolated gain(1q21) (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.67). ORRs, MRD-negativity rates, and sustained (≥12 months) MRD-negativity rates were higher with D-Rd versus Rd across subgroups. In patients aged ≥75 years, rates of grade 3/4 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar for D-Rd and Rd, but discontinuation due to TEAEs was lower for D-Rd. Results support use of D-Rd for high-risk patients, supporting D-Rd as a standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02252172.</p><figure></figure>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在MAIA研究中(中位随访56.2个月),达拉单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(D-Rd)治疗移植不符合条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期明显优于来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)单独治疗。在这项对MAIA临床重要亚组(中位随访,64.5个月)的回顾性分析中,不适合移植的NDMM患者按1:1的比例随机分配到D-Rd或Rd。次要终点包括总缓解率(ORR)和可测量的残留疾病(MRD)阴性率(10-5)。在大多数亚组中,PFS倾向于D-Rd而不是Rd,包括年龄≥75岁的患者(HR, 0.59;95% CI, 0.44-0.79),体弱患者(HR, 0.64;95% CI, 0.48-0.85),高危细胞遗传学患者(HR, 0.59;95% CI, 0.44-0.80)和分离增益患者(1q21) (HR, 0.36;95% ci, 0.19-0.67)。在亚组中,Rd组的orr、mrd阴性率和持续(≥12个月)mrd阴性率高于Rd组。在年龄≥75岁的患者中,D-Rd和Rd组的3/4级和严重治疗不良事件(teae)发生率相似,但D-Rd组因teae而停药的发生率较低。结果支持在高危患者中使用D-Rd,支持D-Rd作为不适合移植的NDMM的标准治疗。该试验在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT02252172。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in untreated multiple myeloma: analysis of key subgroups of the MAIA study

In the MAIA study (median follow-up, 56.2 months), daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In this post hoc analysis of clinically important subgroups in MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and measurable residual disease (MRD)–negativity rate (10–5). PFS favored D-Rd versus Rd in most subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.79), frail patients (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.85), patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.80), and patients with isolated gain(1q21) (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.67). ORRs, MRD-negativity rates, and sustained (≥12 months) MRD-negativity rates were higher with D-Rd versus Rd across subgroups. In patients aged ≥75 years, rates of grade 3/4 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar for D-Rd and Rd, but discontinuation due to TEAEs was lower for D-Rd. Results support use of D-Rd for high-risk patients, supporting D-Rd as a standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02252172.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
期刊最新文献
Targeting ABCD1-ACOX1-MET/IGF1R axis suppresses multiple myeloma Probability of remission with reinduction with 7+3 versus high-dose cytarabine: analysis of SWOG trial S1203 Effective eradication of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells with FLT3-directed antibody-drug conjugates International myeloma working group immunotherapy committee recommendation on sequencing immunotherapy for treatment of multiple myeloma Maternal weight during pregnancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in offspring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1