东亚两个地点古新世-始新世极热期野火活动的时空异质性

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geophysical Research Letters Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1029/2024GL113829
Zuoling Chen, Chenyan Li, Shiling Yang, Peizong Lü, Zihua Tang, Jimin Sun, Xijun Ni, Linhao Fang, Zhongli Ding
{"title":"东亚两个地点古新世-始新世极热期野火活动的时空异质性","authors":"Zuoling Chen,&nbsp;Chenyan Li,&nbsp;Shiling Yang,&nbsp;Peizong Lü,&nbsp;Zihua Tang,&nbsp;Jimin Sun,&nbsp;Xijun Ni,&nbsp;Linhao Fang,&nbsp;Zhongli Ding","doi":"10.1029/2024GL113829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; ∼56 Ma) was a period of extreme global warming associated with a massive influx of isotopically light carbon into the ocean–atmosphere system. The burning of Paleocene peatland (wildfire hypothesis) has been proposed as a potential light carbon source. In addition, numerical models have predicted that wildfire activity would intensify in response to CO<sub>2</sub>-induced global warming. In this study, we tested the wildfire hypothesis and model prediction by tracing the wildfire history across the PETM in East Asia using polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The PAH record exhibited notable spatiotemporal heterogeneity, indicating that wildfire activity varied widely across different regions and time periods during the PETM and highlighting the complex interplay between climate, vegetation, and fire dynamics. Global wildfire records do not support the global burning of Paleocene peatland; therefore, a wildfire-related light carbon source requires close scrutiny.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113829","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Sites in East Asia Add to Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Wildfire Activity Across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum\",\"authors\":\"Zuoling Chen,&nbsp;Chenyan Li,&nbsp;Shiling Yang,&nbsp;Peizong Lü,&nbsp;Zihua Tang,&nbsp;Jimin Sun,&nbsp;Xijun Ni,&nbsp;Linhao Fang,&nbsp;Zhongli Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL113829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; ∼56 Ma) was a period of extreme global warming associated with a massive influx of isotopically light carbon into the ocean–atmosphere system. The burning of Paleocene peatland (wildfire hypothesis) has been proposed as a potential light carbon source. In addition, numerical models have predicted that wildfire activity would intensify in response to CO<sub>2</sub>-induced global warming. In this study, we tested the wildfire hypothesis and model prediction by tracing the wildfire history across the PETM in East Asia using polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The PAH record exhibited notable spatiotemporal heterogeneity, indicating that wildfire activity varied widely across different regions and time periods during the PETM and highlighting the complex interplay between climate, vegetation, and fire dynamics. Global wildfire records do not support the global burning of Paleocene peatland; therefore, a wildfire-related light carbon source requires close scrutiny.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113829\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113829\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古新世-始新世极热期;~ 56 Ma)是一个极端的全球变暖时期,与同位素轻碳大量涌入海洋-大气系统有关。古新世泥炭地的燃烧(野火假说)被认为是潜在的轻碳源。此外,数值模型预测,由于二氧化碳引起的全球变暖,野火活动将会加剧。在这项研究中,我们通过使用多环芳烃(PAHs)追踪东亚PETM的野火历史,验证了野火假设和模型预测。多环芳烃记录显示出明显的时空异质性,表明在PETM期间,野火活动在不同区域和时间段存在很大差异,突出了气候、植被和火灾动态之间复杂的相互作用。全球野火记录不支持古新世泥炭地的全球燃烧;因此,与野火有关的轻碳源需要密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Sites in East Asia Add to Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Wildfire Activity Across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; ∼56 Ma) was a period of extreme global warming associated with a massive influx of isotopically light carbon into the ocean–atmosphere system. The burning of Paleocene peatland (wildfire hypothesis) has been proposed as a potential light carbon source. In addition, numerical models have predicted that wildfire activity would intensify in response to CO2-induced global warming. In this study, we tested the wildfire hypothesis and model prediction by tracing the wildfire history across the PETM in East Asia using polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The PAH record exhibited notable spatiotemporal heterogeneity, indicating that wildfire activity varied widely across different regions and time periods during the PETM and highlighting the complex interplay between climate, vegetation, and fire dynamics. Global wildfire records do not support the global burning of Paleocene peatland; therefore, a wildfire-related light carbon source requires close scrutiny.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
期刊最新文献
Mars' Hemispheric Magnetic Field From a Full-Sphere Dynamo A Potential Mushy Source for the Geysers of Enceladus and Other Icy Satellites Transport of Nitric Oxide in the Winter Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere Understanding the Relationship Between South Pacific Oscillation and ENSO Liquid Fragmentation Induced by Particle Aggregation During Two-Phase Flow in 3D Porous Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1