Yue Yu , Jiaojun Zhu , Tian Gao , Zhihua Liu , Lifang Liu , Fengyuan Yu , Jinxin Zhang
{"title":"陆地激光扫描导出的冠层存储量提高了修正Gash模型在温带森林中的性能","authors":"Yue Yu , Jiaojun Zhu , Tian Gao , Zhihua Liu , Lifang Liu , Fengyuan Yu , Jinxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rainfall interception loss (<em>I</em>) by forest canopy is a crucial hydrological process in forest ecosystems, and thus its accurate modeling is essential for understanding water balance. The revised Gash model is commonly employed in <em>I</em> modeling; however, its performance is affected by the accuracy of canopy storage capacity (<em>S</em>), which is identified as one of the most sensitive parameters. Consequently, optimizing the estimation of <em>S</em> and then cascading application in the revised Gash model warrants further attention. In this study, we measured gross rainfall, throughfall, and stemflow for the larch (<em>Larix kaempferi</em>) plantation forest (LPF) and the Mongolian oak (<em>Quercus mongolica</em>) forest (MOF) in Northeast China in 2018 and 2019. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was introduced to derive <em>S</em> (<em>S<sub>ex</sub></em>). <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> was then compared with values calculated from two commonly regression-based methods (<em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> and <em>S<sub>mini</sub></em>). Finally, the revised Gash model was run using the three types of <em>S</em>, and the model performances were evaluated. As a result, <em>I</em> of LPF (27.9 %) was higher than that of MOF (20.1 %). For LPF and MOF, <em>S</em> calculated from <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> was the largest (1.45 and 0.51 mm), followed in descending order by <em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> (0.98 and 0.32 mm) and <em>S<sub>mini</sub></em> (0.29 and 0.13 mm). Compared with models run with <em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> and <em>S<sub>mini</sub>, S<sub>ex</sub></em> improved the model performance, regardless of whether the Penman-Monteith equation or a linear regression method was used to calculate the evaporation rate (another sensitive parameter of the revised Gash model). Moreover, the model using <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> particularly enhanced the model's accuracy at middle and heavy rainfall levels. In conclusion, the TLS-derived <em>S</em> improves the model performance in temperate forests in Northeast China. Meanwhile, in contrast to previous studies, which emphasized the contribution of evaporation rate/rainfall intensity (<em>E/R</em>) in modelling larger rainfall events, this study suggests the role of <em>S</em> should not be overlooked.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 110398"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terrestrial laser scanning-derived canopy storage capacity improves the performance of the revised Gash model in temperate forests\",\"authors\":\"Yue Yu , Jiaojun Zhu , Tian Gao , Zhihua Liu , Lifang Liu , Fengyuan Yu , Jinxin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rainfall interception loss (<em>I</em>) by forest canopy is a crucial hydrological process in forest ecosystems, and thus its accurate modeling is essential for understanding water balance. The revised Gash model is commonly employed in <em>I</em> modeling; however, its performance is affected by the accuracy of canopy storage capacity (<em>S</em>), which is identified as one of the most sensitive parameters. Consequently, optimizing the estimation of <em>S</em> and then cascading application in the revised Gash model warrants further attention. In this study, we measured gross rainfall, throughfall, and stemflow for the larch (<em>Larix kaempferi</em>) plantation forest (LPF) and the Mongolian oak (<em>Quercus mongolica</em>) forest (MOF) in Northeast China in 2018 and 2019. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was introduced to derive <em>S</em> (<em>S<sub>ex</sub></em>). <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> was then compared with values calculated from two commonly regression-based methods (<em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> and <em>S<sub>mini</sub></em>). Finally, the revised Gash model was run using the three types of <em>S</em>, and the model performances were evaluated. As a result, <em>I</em> of LPF (27.9 %) was higher than that of MOF (20.1 %). For LPF and MOF, <em>S</em> calculated from <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> was the largest (1.45 and 0.51 mm), followed in descending order by <em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> (0.98 and 0.32 mm) and <em>S<sub>mini</sub></em> (0.29 and 0.13 mm). Compared with models run with <em>S<sub>mean</sub></em> and <em>S<sub>mini</sub>, S<sub>ex</sub></em> improved the model performance, regardless of whether the Penman-Monteith equation or a linear regression method was used to calculate the evaporation rate (another sensitive parameter of the revised Gash model). Moreover, the model using <em>S<sub>ex</sub></em> particularly enhanced the model's accuracy at middle and heavy rainfall levels. In conclusion, the TLS-derived <em>S</em> improves the model performance in temperate forests in Northeast China. Meanwhile, in contrast to previous studies, which emphasized the contribution of evaporation rate/rainfall intensity (<em>E/R</em>) in modelling larger rainfall events, this study suggests the role of <em>S</em> should not be overlooked.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"363 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000188\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Terrestrial laser scanning-derived canopy storage capacity improves the performance of the revised Gash model in temperate forests
Rainfall interception loss (I) by forest canopy is a crucial hydrological process in forest ecosystems, and thus its accurate modeling is essential for understanding water balance. The revised Gash model is commonly employed in I modeling; however, its performance is affected by the accuracy of canopy storage capacity (S), which is identified as one of the most sensitive parameters. Consequently, optimizing the estimation of S and then cascading application in the revised Gash model warrants further attention. In this study, we measured gross rainfall, throughfall, and stemflow for the larch (Larix kaempferi) plantation forest (LPF) and the Mongolian oak (Quercus mongolica) forest (MOF) in Northeast China in 2018 and 2019. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was introduced to derive S (Sex). Sex was then compared with values calculated from two commonly regression-based methods (Smean and Smini). Finally, the revised Gash model was run using the three types of S, and the model performances were evaluated. As a result, I of LPF (27.9 %) was higher than that of MOF (20.1 %). For LPF and MOF, S calculated from Sex was the largest (1.45 and 0.51 mm), followed in descending order by Smean (0.98 and 0.32 mm) and Smini (0.29 and 0.13 mm). Compared with models run with Smean and Smini, Sex improved the model performance, regardless of whether the Penman-Monteith equation or a linear regression method was used to calculate the evaporation rate (another sensitive parameter of the revised Gash model). Moreover, the model using Sex particularly enhanced the model's accuracy at middle and heavy rainfall levels. In conclusion, the TLS-derived S improves the model performance in temperate forests in Northeast China. Meanwhile, in contrast to previous studies, which emphasized the contribution of evaporation rate/rainfall intensity (E/R) in modelling larger rainfall events, this study suggests the role of S should not be overlooked.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.