Marek Wasilewski, Grzegorz Ligus, Lakhbir Singh Brar
{"title":"不同柱形高度方形旋风分离器内流动现象的研究","authors":"Marek Wasilewski, Grzegorz Ligus, Lakhbir Singh Brar","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the impact of various prismatic heights (PHs) on the performance of square cyclones at three Reynolds numbers, viz. <em>Re</em> = 27626, 37,985 and 48345. We have accounted for seven different PHs, viz. 1.0<em>D</em>, 1.5<em>D</em>, 2.0<em>D</em>, 2.5<em>D</em>, 3.0<em>D</em>, 3.5<em>D</em>, and 4.0<em>D</em> – here, <em>D</em> represents the prismatic section dimension of the square cross-sectional area. Model 2.0<em>D</em> is the reference model used to evaluate relative performance. A high-performance turbulence model large-eddy simulation has been used to calculate the separation efficiency and pressure drop. The assumptions made in the numerical studies were validated using experimental and PIV studies. Considering the latter, solid particles with three different densities viz. 1100, 2100, and 2800 kg/m<sup>3</sup> are analysed. We also present the flow details in the form of variations in the mean and standard deviation values of scalar and vector quantities. It has been observed that with an increase in the PH, given a <em>Re</em> value, there is a marginal variation in pressure drop values, which amounts to a maximum value of less than 5 % at <em>Re</em> = 48345. Compared to the mild variations in pressure losses, the differences in the collection efficiencies are significant but slightly dramatic (in context to the particle density). A maximum enhancement of more than 26 % has been observed for particle density 1100 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at <em>Re</em> = 48345. Conclusive results indicate that model 4.0<em>D</em> outperforms all the variants, and this model works more efficiently, particularly for low-density particles. It was shown that in the case of square cyclones, it may also be important to adapt the geometry of the separator not only to the flow conditions of the fluid phase but also to take into account the properties of the solid phase. In this case, the selection of PHs may be crucial.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigations of the flow phenomena inside square cyclone separators with different prismatic heights\",\"authors\":\"Marek Wasilewski, Grzegorz Ligus, Lakhbir Singh Brar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research investigates the impact of various prismatic heights (PHs) on the performance of square cyclones at three Reynolds numbers, viz. <em>Re</em> = 27626, 37,985 and 48345. We have accounted for seven different PHs, viz. 1.0<em>D</em>, 1.5<em>D</em>, 2.0<em>D</em>, 2.5<em>D</em>, 3.0<em>D</em>, 3.5<em>D</em>, and 4.0<em>D</em> – here, <em>D</em> represents the prismatic section dimension of the square cross-sectional area. Model 2.0<em>D</em> is the reference model used to evaluate relative performance. A high-performance turbulence model large-eddy simulation has been used to calculate the separation efficiency and pressure drop. The assumptions made in the numerical studies were validated using experimental and PIV studies. Considering the latter, solid particles with three different densities viz. 1100, 2100, and 2800 kg/m<sup>3</sup> are analysed. We also present the flow details in the form of variations in the mean and standard deviation values of scalar and vector quantities. It has been observed that with an increase in the PH, given a <em>Re</em> value, there is a marginal variation in pressure drop values, which amounts to a maximum value of less than 5 % at <em>Re</em> = 48345. Compared to the mild variations in pressure losses, the differences in the collection efficiencies are significant but slightly dramatic (in context to the particle density). A maximum enhancement of more than 26 % has been observed for particle density 1100 kg/m<sup>3</sup> at <em>Re</em> = 48345. Conclusive results indicate that model 4.0<em>D</em> outperforms all the variants, and this model works more efficiently, particularly for low-density particles. It was shown that in the case of square cyclones, it may also be important to adapt the geometry of the separator not only to the flow conditions of the fluid phase but also to take into account the properties of the solid phase. In this case, the selection of PHs may be crucial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131724\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigations of the flow phenomena inside square cyclone separators with different prismatic heights
This research investigates the impact of various prismatic heights (PHs) on the performance of square cyclones at three Reynolds numbers, viz. Re = 27626, 37,985 and 48345. We have accounted for seven different PHs, viz. 1.0D, 1.5D, 2.0D, 2.5D, 3.0D, 3.5D, and 4.0D – here, D represents the prismatic section dimension of the square cross-sectional area. Model 2.0D is the reference model used to evaluate relative performance. A high-performance turbulence model large-eddy simulation has been used to calculate the separation efficiency and pressure drop. The assumptions made in the numerical studies were validated using experimental and PIV studies. Considering the latter, solid particles with three different densities viz. 1100, 2100, and 2800 kg/m3 are analysed. We also present the flow details in the form of variations in the mean and standard deviation values of scalar and vector quantities. It has been observed that with an increase in the PH, given a Re value, there is a marginal variation in pressure drop values, which amounts to a maximum value of less than 5 % at Re = 48345. Compared to the mild variations in pressure losses, the differences in the collection efficiencies are significant but slightly dramatic (in context to the particle density). A maximum enhancement of more than 26 % has been observed for particle density 1100 kg/m3 at Re = 48345. Conclusive results indicate that model 4.0D outperforms all the variants, and this model works more efficiently, particularly for low-density particles. It was shown that in the case of square cyclones, it may also be important to adapt the geometry of the separator not only to the flow conditions of the fluid phase but also to take into account the properties of the solid phase. In this case, the selection of PHs may be crucial.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.