生态制度和新兴大型植物如何决定沉积物微生物群落:对典型富营养化浅湖的新见解

IF 3.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY Limnology and Oceanography Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1002/lno.12799
Rujia He, Dayong Zhao, Qi Zhou, Qinglong L. Wu, Jin Zeng
{"title":"生态制度和新兴大型植物如何决定沉积物微生物群落:对典型富营养化浅湖的新见解","authors":"Rujia He, Dayong Zhao, Qi Zhou, Qinglong L. Wu, Jin Zeng","doi":"10.1002/lno.12799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the response of microbial communities to different ecological regimes in eutrophic lakes and the underlying assembly mechanisms is of great significance for revealing the biodiversity maintenance mechanisms of lake ecosystems under alternative stable states. However, our current understanding of the response of sediment microbial communities under emergent macrophytes to regime shifts remains limited. Here, we demonstrated, for the first time, the asynchronous variations of littoral sediment bacterial and fungal communities, regarding the microbial diversities, assembly mechanisms, and inter‐kingdom interactions across three lake regional regimes: macrophyte‐dominated, transitional, and phytoplankton‐dominated. We found the alpha diversities of the bacterial and fungal communities showed opposite trends, as the transitional regime had the highest bacterial but lowest fungal diversities. Stochastic processes, dominated by dispersal limitation, determined fungal community assembly, whereas deterministic processes, especially variable selection, shaped the bacterial community. The highest number of species–environment interactions and proportion of intra‐kingdom interactions were observed in the co‐occurrence network of the transitional regime; however, this network had the lowest proportion of inter‐kingdom (bacteria–fungi) interactions among the three lake regional regimes. Furthermore, the macrophyte‐dominated regime was observed to have the most complex network structure and maintain the highest microbial community stability. The rhizosphere of <jats:italic>Phragmites australis</jats:italic> enhanced the inter‐kingdom interactions of bacterial and fungal communities. These findings provide a preliminary ecological perspective for understanding the hysteresis of regimes in response to environmental stress at the microbial community level and emphasize the importance of distinguishing ecologically distinct microbial taxa in future studies focused on alternative stable states.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How ecological regimes and emergent macrophytes determine sediment microbial communities: A new insight into typical eutrophic shallow lakes\",\"authors\":\"Rujia He, Dayong Zhao, Qi Zhou, Qinglong L. Wu, Jin Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lno.12799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the response of microbial communities to different ecological regimes in eutrophic lakes and the underlying assembly mechanisms is of great significance for revealing the biodiversity maintenance mechanisms of lake ecosystems under alternative stable states. However, our current understanding of the response of sediment microbial communities under emergent macrophytes to regime shifts remains limited. Here, we demonstrated, for the first time, the asynchronous variations of littoral sediment bacterial and fungal communities, regarding the microbial diversities, assembly mechanisms, and inter‐kingdom interactions across three lake regional regimes: macrophyte‐dominated, transitional, and phytoplankton‐dominated. We found the alpha diversities of the bacterial and fungal communities showed opposite trends, as the transitional regime had the highest bacterial but lowest fungal diversities. Stochastic processes, dominated by dispersal limitation, determined fungal community assembly, whereas deterministic processes, especially variable selection, shaped the bacterial community. The highest number of species–environment interactions and proportion of intra‐kingdom interactions were observed in the co‐occurrence network of the transitional regime; however, this network had the lowest proportion of inter‐kingdom (bacteria–fungi) interactions among the three lake regional regimes. Furthermore, the macrophyte‐dominated regime was observed to have the most complex network structure and maintain the highest microbial community stability. The rhizosphere of <jats:italic>Phragmites australis</jats:italic> enhanced the inter‐kingdom interactions of bacterial and fungal communities. These findings provide a preliminary ecological perspective for understanding the hysteresis of regimes in response to environmental stress at the microbial community level and emphasize the importance of distinguishing ecologically distinct microbial taxa in future studies focused on alternative stable states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12799\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解富营养化湖泊微生物群落对不同生态制度的响应及其集聚机制,对于揭示湖泊生态系统在不同稳定状态下的生物多样性维持机制具有重要意义。然而,我们目前对新兴大型植物下沉积物微生物群落对状态变化的响应的理解仍然有限。在这里,我们首次展示了沿海沉积物细菌和真菌群落的异步变化,涉及微生物多样性、组装机制和跨三种湖泊区域机制的相互作用:大型植物为主、过渡性植物为主和浮游植物为主。细菌和真菌群落的α多样性呈现相反的趋势,过渡区细菌多样性最高,真菌多样性最低。以扩散限制为主导的随机过程决定了真菌群落的聚集,而确定性过程,特别是变量选择,则塑造了细菌群落。物种-环境相互作用的数量和王国内相互作用的比例在过渡制度的共现网络中观察到最高;然而,该网络在三个湖泊区域体系中具有最低的王国间(细菌-真菌)相互作用比例。此外,研究还发现,以大型植物为主的生态系统具有最复杂的网络结构,并保持最高的微生物群落稳定性。芦苇根际增强了细菌和真菌群落间的相互作用。这些发现为在微生物群落水平上理解环境胁迫响应机制的滞后性提供了初步的生态学视角,并强调了在未来的研究中区分生态上不同的微生物类群的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How ecological regimes and emergent macrophytes determine sediment microbial communities: A new insight into typical eutrophic shallow lakes
Understanding the response of microbial communities to different ecological regimes in eutrophic lakes and the underlying assembly mechanisms is of great significance for revealing the biodiversity maintenance mechanisms of lake ecosystems under alternative stable states. However, our current understanding of the response of sediment microbial communities under emergent macrophytes to regime shifts remains limited. Here, we demonstrated, for the first time, the asynchronous variations of littoral sediment bacterial and fungal communities, regarding the microbial diversities, assembly mechanisms, and inter‐kingdom interactions across three lake regional regimes: macrophyte‐dominated, transitional, and phytoplankton‐dominated. We found the alpha diversities of the bacterial and fungal communities showed opposite trends, as the transitional regime had the highest bacterial but lowest fungal diversities. Stochastic processes, dominated by dispersal limitation, determined fungal community assembly, whereas deterministic processes, especially variable selection, shaped the bacterial community. The highest number of species–environment interactions and proportion of intra‐kingdom interactions were observed in the co‐occurrence network of the transitional regime; however, this network had the lowest proportion of inter‐kingdom (bacteria–fungi) interactions among the three lake regional regimes. Furthermore, the macrophyte‐dominated regime was observed to have the most complex network structure and maintain the highest microbial community stability. The rhizosphere of Phragmites australis enhanced the inter‐kingdom interactions of bacterial and fungal communities. These findings provide a preliminary ecological perspective for understanding the hysteresis of regimes in response to environmental stress at the microbial community level and emphasize the importance of distinguishing ecologically distinct microbial taxa in future studies focused on alternative stable states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
期刊最新文献
Epiphyton phenology determines the persistence of submerged macrophytes: Exemplified in temperate shallow lakes Wave‐driven plant reconfiguration modifies light availability in seagrass meadows Ontogenetic shifts by juvenile fishes highlight the need for habitat heterogeneity and connectivity in river restoration Hypoxia threatens coral and sea anemone early life stages Benthic bacterial communities are shaped by browning in boreal headwater streams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1