Lissethe F. G. Lamadrid, Jochen Schwarz, Holger Maiwald
{"title":"EQ损伤预后的内在问题:来自L 'Aquila数据库系统评价和不同级别数据可用性的经验","authors":"Lissethe F. G. Lamadrid, Jochen Schwarz, Holger Maiwald","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Within the European TURNkey project, a knowledge-based exposure-modelling framework was developed, enabling the consideration of different levels of investigation and data availability. In particular, the proposed framework recognizes various levels and origins of uncertainties, as well as the completeness of a building stock catalogue. Despite substantial efforts, the main question still needs to be answered: How reliable can the developed tools and instruments be if they are not tested and validated by actual events? The L’Aquila 2009 earthquake has been the subject of several analytical strategies to enrich earthquake engineering knowledge. In this study, the information provided by the Italian Observed Damage Database is analyzed, explicitly focusing on the seismic sequence of the L’Aquila 2009 earthquake within the delimited area of the city’s historical center. A second dataset, where the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) was used as a reference, is integrated into the study, and the results are compared. A methodology is implemented for a systematically evaluating the database based on the EMS-98. From the data analysis, a proposal is made to define a comparable EMS-98 building typology and to assign vulnerability classes considering optimistic, pessimistic and most likely criteria. The reliability of the sample is then explored using the knowledge-based exposure modelling framework established by the TURNkey Project. Accuracy is then evaluated through an empirical inspection of frontal (lateral) views available in Google Street View (2022). Images before and after the event are collected and compared with the available data. Intrinsic problems encountered during the process are then listed and discussed, particularly regarding the use of the database, the joint between the studied datasets, and the post-processing required to use the data for damage prognosis. This paper intends to demonstrate how reliable datasets for the building stock, including structural types and corresponding vulnerability classes, can be elaborated. Not least, exposure modelling has to transform the available data into a descriptive form that can be linked directly with the Fragility or Vulnerability Functions, expecting that these assignments are the best suited or representative ones. The data layers provided by the study enable the testing and training of exposure modelling techniques for the selected event and target region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"411 - 451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intrinsic problems in EQ damage prognosis: the experience from a systematic evaluation of L’Aquila databases and different levels of data availability\",\"authors\":\"Lissethe F. G. Lamadrid, Jochen Schwarz, Holger Maiwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Within the European TURNkey project, a knowledge-based exposure-modelling framework was developed, enabling the consideration of different levels of investigation and data availability. In particular, the proposed framework recognizes various levels and origins of uncertainties, as well as the completeness of a building stock catalogue. Despite substantial efforts, the main question still needs to be answered: How reliable can the developed tools and instruments be if they are not tested and validated by actual events? The L’Aquila 2009 earthquake has been the subject of several analytical strategies to enrich earthquake engineering knowledge. In this study, the information provided by the Italian Observed Damage Database is analyzed, explicitly focusing on the seismic sequence of the L’Aquila 2009 earthquake within the delimited area of the city’s historical center. A second dataset, where the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) was used as a reference, is integrated into the study, and the results are compared. A methodology is implemented for a systematically evaluating the database based on the EMS-98. From the data analysis, a proposal is made to define a comparable EMS-98 building typology and to assign vulnerability classes considering optimistic, pessimistic and most likely criteria. The reliability of the sample is then explored using the knowledge-based exposure modelling framework established by the TURNkey Project. Accuracy is then evaluated through an empirical inspection of frontal (lateral) views available in Google Street View (2022). Images before and after the event are collected and compared with the available data. Intrinsic problems encountered during the process are then listed and discussed, particularly regarding the use of the database, the joint between the studied datasets, and the post-processing required to use the data for damage prognosis. This paper intends to demonstrate how reliable datasets for the building stock, including structural types and corresponding vulnerability classes, can be elaborated. Not least, exposure modelling has to transform the available data into a descriptive form that can be linked directly with the Fragility or Vulnerability Functions, expecting that these assignments are the best suited or representative ones. The data layers provided by the study enable the testing and training of exposure modelling techniques for the selected event and target region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"411 - 451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02045-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The intrinsic problems in EQ damage prognosis: the experience from a systematic evaluation of L’Aquila databases and different levels of data availability
Within the European TURNkey project, a knowledge-based exposure-modelling framework was developed, enabling the consideration of different levels of investigation and data availability. In particular, the proposed framework recognizes various levels and origins of uncertainties, as well as the completeness of a building stock catalogue. Despite substantial efforts, the main question still needs to be answered: How reliable can the developed tools and instruments be if they are not tested and validated by actual events? The L’Aquila 2009 earthquake has been the subject of several analytical strategies to enrich earthquake engineering knowledge. In this study, the information provided by the Italian Observed Damage Database is analyzed, explicitly focusing on the seismic sequence of the L’Aquila 2009 earthquake within the delimited area of the city’s historical center. A second dataset, where the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) was used as a reference, is integrated into the study, and the results are compared. A methodology is implemented for a systematically evaluating the database based on the EMS-98. From the data analysis, a proposal is made to define a comparable EMS-98 building typology and to assign vulnerability classes considering optimistic, pessimistic and most likely criteria. The reliability of the sample is then explored using the knowledge-based exposure modelling framework established by the TURNkey Project. Accuracy is then evaluated through an empirical inspection of frontal (lateral) views available in Google Street View (2022). Images before and after the event are collected and compared with the available data. Intrinsic problems encountered during the process are then listed and discussed, particularly regarding the use of the database, the joint between the studied datasets, and the post-processing required to use the data for damage prognosis. This paper intends to demonstrate how reliable datasets for the building stock, including structural types and corresponding vulnerability classes, can be elaborated. Not least, exposure modelling has to transform the available data into a descriptive form that can be linked directly with the Fragility or Vulnerability Functions, expecting that these assignments are the best suited or representative ones. The data layers provided by the study enable the testing and training of exposure modelling techniques for the selected event and target region.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.