Giorgio Rubini, Gian Michele Calvi, Roberto Gentile
{"title":"基于直接损失的钢筋混凝土框架抗震加固","authors":"Giorgio Rubini, Gian Michele Calvi, Roberto Gentile","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In earthquake-prone areas, structures not compliant with modern design codes significantly contribute to seismic risk. Therefore, risk mitigation strategies (e.g., seismic retrofit) should be employed to reduce the expected economic and human losses. This paper introduces a procedure for the design of retrofit solutions for reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings to achieve - rather than be bounded by - a desired target level of earthquake-induced loss for a given site-specific seismic hazard profile. The presented methodology is “direct” because the designer and/or client can set a loss target in the first step of the procedure and no design iterations are virtually required. Direct loss-based seismic retrofit (DLBR) relies on a simplified loss assessment methodology enabled by a surrogate probabilistic seismic demand model. This defines the probability distribution of seismic deformation demand of single degree of freedom (SDoF) systems conditioned on different shaking intensity levels. The proposed design methodology enables designers to account for risk/loss-based considerations from the conceptual/preliminary design phase, thus facilitating the choice among different retrofit solutions. Starting from two under-designed case-study buildings, four illustrative applications of the procedure are provided. They involve considering different economic expected annual loss targets and different retrofit solutions involving the addition of RC walls and RC column jacketing. Benchmark loss estimates are calculated using non-linear time-history analyses of refined, multi-degree-of-freedom models showing satisfactory results: the simplified loss estimate introduces an overestimation maximum equal to 15.4% among the four illustrative applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"327 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct loss-based seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Rubini, Gian Michele Calvi, Roberto Gentile\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In earthquake-prone areas, structures not compliant with modern design codes significantly contribute to seismic risk. Therefore, risk mitigation strategies (e.g., seismic retrofit) should be employed to reduce the expected economic and human losses. This paper introduces a procedure for the design of retrofit solutions for reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings to achieve - rather than be bounded by - a desired target level of earthquake-induced loss for a given site-specific seismic hazard profile. The presented methodology is “direct” because the designer and/or client can set a loss target in the first step of the procedure and no design iterations are virtually required. Direct loss-based seismic retrofit (DLBR) relies on a simplified loss assessment methodology enabled by a surrogate probabilistic seismic demand model. This defines the probability distribution of seismic deformation demand of single degree of freedom (SDoF) systems conditioned on different shaking intensity levels. The proposed design methodology enables designers to account for risk/loss-based considerations from the conceptual/preliminary design phase, thus facilitating the choice among different retrofit solutions. Starting from two under-designed case-study buildings, four illustrative applications of the procedure are provided. They involve considering different economic expected annual loss targets and different retrofit solutions involving the addition of RC walls and RC column jacketing. Benchmark loss estimates are calculated using non-linear time-history analyses of refined, multi-degree-of-freedom models showing satisfactory results: the simplified loss estimate introduces an overestimation maximum equal to 15.4% among the four illustrative applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"327 - 357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02027-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct loss-based seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames
In earthquake-prone areas, structures not compliant with modern design codes significantly contribute to seismic risk. Therefore, risk mitigation strategies (e.g., seismic retrofit) should be employed to reduce the expected economic and human losses. This paper introduces a procedure for the design of retrofit solutions for reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings to achieve - rather than be bounded by - a desired target level of earthquake-induced loss for a given site-specific seismic hazard profile. The presented methodology is “direct” because the designer and/or client can set a loss target in the first step of the procedure and no design iterations are virtually required. Direct loss-based seismic retrofit (DLBR) relies on a simplified loss assessment methodology enabled by a surrogate probabilistic seismic demand model. This defines the probability distribution of seismic deformation demand of single degree of freedom (SDoF) systems conditioned on different shaking intensity levels. The proposed design methodology enables designers to account for risk/loss-based considerations from the conceptual/preliminary design phase, thus facilitating the choice among different retrofit solutions. Starting from two under-designed case-study buildings, four illustrative applications of the procedure are provided. They involve considering different economic expected annual loss targets and different retrofit solutions involving the addition of RC walls and RC column jacketing. Benchmark loss estimates are calculated using non-linear time-history analyses of refined, multi-degree-of-freedom models showing satisfactory results: the simplified loss estimate introduces an overestimation maximum equal to 15.4% among the four illustrative applications.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.