通过3D打印骨替代物支架设计增强骨生成和机械性能。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01661
Xinyi Cao, Kexin Sun, Junyue Luo, Andi Chen, Qi Wan, Hongyi Zhou, Hongbo Zhou, Yuehua Liu, Xiaojing Chen
{"title":"通过3D打印骨替代物支架设计增强骨生成和机械性能。","authors":"Xinyi Cao, Kexin Sun, Junyue Luo, Andi Chen, Qi Wan, Hongyi Zhou, Hongbo Zhou, Yuehua Liu, Xiaojing Chen","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of regenerative medicine, the design of scaffolds to possess excellent osteogenesis and appropriate mechanical properties has gained significant attention in bone tissue engineering. In this review, we categorized materials into metallic, inorganic, nonmetallic, organic polymer, and composite materials. This review provides a more integrated and multidimensional analysis of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering. Unlike previous works that often focus on single aspects, such as material type or fabrication technique, our review takes a broader approach. It analyzes the interaction between scaffold materials, 3D printing techniques, scaffold structural designs, modification methods, porosities, and pore sizes, and the composition of materials (particularly composite materials). Meanwhile, it focuses on their impacts on scaffolds' osteogenic potential and mechanical performance. This review also provides suggested ranges for porosity and pore size for different materials and outlines recommended surface modification methods. This approach not only consolidates current knowledge but also highlights the interdependencies among various factors affecting scaffold efficacy, offering deeper insights into optimization strategies tailored for specific clinical conditions. Furthermore, we introduce recent advancements in innovative 3D printing techniques and novel composite materials, which are rarely addressed in previous reviews, thereby providing a forward-looking perspective that informs future research directions and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Osteogenesis and Mechanical Properties through Scaffold Design in 3D Printed Bone Substitutes.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Cao, Kexin Sun, Junyue Luo, Andi Chen, Qi Wan, Hongyi Zhou, Hongbo Zhou, Yuehua Liu, Xiaojing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the context of regenerative medicine, the design of scaffolds to possess excellent osteogenesis and appropriate mechanical properties has gained significant attention in bone tissue engineering. In this review, we categorized materials into metallic, inorganic, nonmetallic, organic polymer, and composite materials. This review provides a more integrated and multidimensional analysis of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering. Unlike previous works that often focus on single aspects, such as material type or fabrication technique, our review takes a broader approach. It analyzes the interaction between scaffold materials, 3D printing techniques, scaffold structural designs, modification methods, porosities, and pore sizes, and the composition of materials (particularly composite materials). Meanwhile, it focuses on their impacts on scaffolds' osteogenic potential and mechanical performance. This review also provides suggested ranges for porosity and pore size for different materials and outlines recommended surface modification methods. This approach not only consolidates current knowledge but also highlights the interdependencies among various factors affecting scaffold efficacy, offering deeper insights into optimization strategies tailored for specific clinical conditions. Furthermore, we introduce recent advancements in innovative 3D printing techniques and novel composite materials, which are rarely addressed in previous reviews, thereby providing a forward-looking perspective that informs future research directions and clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01661\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在再生医学的背景下,设计具有良好成骨性和适当力学性能的支架在骨组织工程中受到了极大的关注。本文将材料分为金属材料、无机材料、非金属材料、有机高分子材料和复合材料。这篇综述为骨组织工程支架设计提供了一个更全面和多维的分析。不像以前的工作,往往集中在单一方面,如材料类型或制造技术,我们的审查采取了更广泛的方法。它分析了支架材料、3D打印技术、支架结构设计、修饰方法、孔隙率和孔径以及材料(特别是复合材料)的组成之间的相互作用。同时重点研究了它们对支架成骨潜能和力学性能的影响。本文还提供了不同材料的孔隙率和孔径的建议范围,并概述了推荐的表面改性方法。这种方法不仅巩固了现有的知识,而且强调了影响支架功效的各种因素之间的相互依赖性,为针对特定临床条件量身定制的优化策略提供了更深入的见解。此外,我们还介绍了创新3D打印技术和新型复合材料的最新进展,这些在以前的综述中很少涉及,从而为未来的研究方向和临床应用提供了前瞻性的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Osteogenesis and Mechanical Properties through Scaffold Design in 3D Printed Bone Substitutes.

In the context of regenerative medicine, the design of scaffolds to possess excellent osteogenesis and appropriate mechanical properties has gained significant attention in bone tissue engineering. In this review, we categorized materials into metallic, inorganic, nonmetallic, organic polymer, and composite materials. This review provides a more integrated and multidimensional analysis of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering. Unlike previous works that often focus on single aspects, such as material type or fabrication technique, our review takes a broader approach. It analyzes the interaction between scaffold materials, 3D printing techniques, scaffold structural designs, modification methods, porosities, and pore sizes, and the composition of materials (particularly composite materials). Meanwhile, it focuses on their impacts on scaffolds' osteogenic potential and mechanical performance. This review also provides suggested ranges for porosity and pore size for different materials and outlines recommended surface modification methods. This approach not only consolidates current knowledge but also highlights the interdependencies among various factors affecting scaffold efficacy, offering deeper insights into optimization strategies tailored for specific clinical conditions. Furthermore, we introduce recent advancements in innovative 3D printing techniques and novel composite materials, which are rarely addressed in previous reviews, thereby providing a forward-looking perspective that informs future research directions and clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
期刊最新文献
Generalizable Metamaterials Design Techniques Inspire Efficient Mycelial Materials Inverse Design. Biomimetic Silk Nanoparticle Manufacture: Calcium Ion-Mediated Assembly. Chitosan-Functionalized Fluorescent Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticle Loaded with Methotrexate: Future Theranostics for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Engineered Strategies to Interfere with Macrophage Fate in Myocardial Infarction. Thermosensitive Hydrogel Loaded with α-Mangostin for Enhanced Antitumor Effect of Doxorubicin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1