雨水池:在城市景观中广泛采用的最佳管理实践中未考虑的环境挑战。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124170
Mary G Lusk, Eban Z Bean, Basil V Iannone, Alexander J Reisinger
{"title":"雨水池:在城市景观中广泛采用的最佳管理实践中未考虑的环境挑战。","authors":"Mary G Lusk, Eban Z Bean, Basil V Iannone, Alexander J Reisinger","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stormwater ponds (SWPs) are an increasingly common management tool for flood control and water quality protection in urban areas. They are designed to buffer the impacts to downstream environments caused by altered hydrologic, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in developed watersheds. While small in size, they can have disproportionately large impacts on watersheds because they store, transform, and release inputs of carbon (C) and nutrients, mainly nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In this review, we discuss how SWPs are not passive conveyances of nutrients and C, where minimal internal processing occurs. Rather, they are active hotspots of biogeochemical processing, with implications for downstream water quality protection. We highlight how processes of assimilation, sedimentation, erosion, filtration, remineralization and remobilization, gaseous transformations, and the activities of living organisms all transform nutrients and C in SWPs, sometimes making ponds net exporters of nutrients, rather than net sinks or removers, as is often believed. There are numerous unaccounted challenges in SWP management, such as in-pond processes that decouple pond effluent and influent quality; that sedimentation often fails as a proxy indicator for nutrient removal; how optimizing for removal of one nutrient (nitrogen or phosphorus) may reduce removal efficiencies of the other; or how nutrient removal strategies may be at odds with strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from SWPs. Our goal is to show that SWPs play large roles in constraining and mediating the fluxes of materials and energy in urban ecosystems and that their effluent water quality is driven not only by inflowing water quality but largely also by in-pond processes that warrant increased future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"374 ","pages":"124170"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stormwater ponds: Unaccounted environmental challenges of a widely-adopted best management practice in urban landscapes.\",\"authors\":\"Mary G Lusk, Eban Z Bean, Basil V Iannone, Alexander J Reisinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stormwater ponds (SWPs) are an increasingly common management tool for flood control and water quality protection in urban areas. They are designed to buffer the impacts to downstream environments caused by altered hydrologic, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in developed watersheds. While small in size, they can have disproportionately large impacts on watersheds because they store, transform, and release inputs of carbon (C) and nutrients, mainly nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In this review, we discuss how SWPs are not passive conveyances of nutrients and C, where minimal internal processing occurs. Rather, they are active hotspots of biogeochemical processing, with implications for downstream water quality protection. We highlight how processes of assimilation, sedimentation, erosion, filtration, remineralization and remobilization, gaseous transformations, and the activities of living organisms all transform nutrients and C in SWPs, sometimes making ponds net exporters of nutrients, rather than net sinks or removers, as is often believed. There are numerous unaccounted challenges in SWP management, such as in-pond processes that decouple pond effluent and influent quality; that sedimentation often fails as a proxy indicator for nutrient removal; how optimizing for removal of one nutrient (nitrogen or phosphorus) may reduce removal efficiencies of the other; or how nutrient removal strategies may be at odds with strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from SWPs. Our goal is to show that SWPs play large roles in constraining and mediating the fluxes of materials and energy in urban ecosystems and that their effluent water quality is driven not only by inflowing water quality but largely also by in-pond processes that warrant increased future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"374 \",\"pages\":\"124170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124170\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雨水池(SWPs)是城市地区防洪和水质保护日益普遍的管理工具。它们的设计是为了缓冲已开发流域的水文、化学、生物和生态过程改变对下游环境造成的影响。虽然规模很小,但它们可以对流域产生不成比例的巨大影响,因为它们储存、转化和释放碳(C)和营养物质(主要是氮(N)和磷(P))的输入。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了SWPs如何不是营养物质和C的被动运输,其中内部处理最少。相反,它们是生物地球化学处理的活跃热点,对下游水质保护具有重要意义。我们强调了同化、沉积、侵蚀、过滤、再矿化和再活化、气体转化以及生物体活动等过程如何转化SWPs中的营养物质和碳,有时使池塘成为营养物质的净出口国,而不是通常认为的净汇或净去除者。SWP管理中存在许多未解释的挑战,例如池内处理将池流出物与进水质量分离;沉淀往往不能作为营养物去除的替代指标;如何优化去除一种营养物(氮或磷)可能降低另一种营养物的去除效率;或者去除营养物质的策略如何与减少swp温室气体排放的策略不一致。我们的目标是表明SWPs在限制和调节城市生态系统中物质和能量的通量方面发挥着重要作用,它们的出水水质不仅受流入水质的影响,而且在很大程度上受池内过程的影响,这需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stormwater ponds: Unaccounted environmental challenges of a widely-adopted best management practice in urban landscapes.

Stormwater ponds (SWPs) are an increasingly common management tool for flood control and water quality protection in urban areas. They are designed to buffer the impacts to downstream environments caused by altered hydrologic, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in developed watersheds. While small in size, they can have disproportionately large impacts on watersheds because they store, transform, and release inputs of carbon (C) and nutrients, mainly nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). In this review, we discuss how SWPs are not passive conveyances of nutrients and C, where minimal internal processing occurs. Rather, they are active hotspots of biogeochemical processing, with implications for downstream water quality protection. We highlight how processes of assimilation, sedimentation, erosion, filtration, remineralization and remobilization, gaseous transformations, and the activities of living organisms all transform nutrients and C in SWPs, sometimes making ponds net exporters of nutrients, rather than net sinks or removers, as is often believed. There are numerous unaccounted challenges in SWP management, such as in-pond processes that decouple pond effluent and influent quality; that sedimentation often fails as a proxy indicator for nutrient removal; how optimizing for removal of one nutrient (nitrogen or phosphorus) may reduce removal efficiencies of the other; or how nutrient removal strategies may be at odds with strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from SWPs. Our goal is to show that SWPs play large roles in constraining and mediating the fluxes of materials and energy in urban ecosystems and that their effluent water quality is driven not only by inflowing water quality but largely also by in-pond processes that warrant increased future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability amid conflict: Gaza's environmental, social, and economic struggles Confirming the key factors influencing the biosynthesis and regulation of organic nitrogen in composting Performance and mechanism of a novel hydrolytic bacteria pretreatment to boost waste activated sludge disintegration and volatile fatty acids production during acidogenic fermentation A chemically enhanced primary treatment and anammox-based process for sustainable municipal wastewater treatment: The advantage and application prospects Integrating regionalisation, uncertainty, and nonstationarity in modelling extreme rainfall events in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1