迈向绿色经济:研究可持续金融、绿色技术和环境政策对环境退化的影响。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124047
Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal, Wasim Abbas Saheen, Suheela Shabir, Usman Ullah, Ienciu Ionel-Alin, Marius-Ioan Mihut, António Raposo, Heesup Han
{"title":"迈向绿色经济:研究可持续金融、绿色技术和环境政策对环境退化的影响。","authors":"Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal, Wasim Abbas Saheen, Suheela Shabir, Usman Ullah, Ienciu Ionel-Alin, Marius-Ioan Mihut, António Raposo, Heesup Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental degradation is a problem, and the consequences, in terms of emission of pollutants into different ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development are disastrous. This study explains the complex interactions that exist among sustainable finance, green technology innovation, green energy adoption, the climate change financial policy, green growth index, government spending, and financial globalization across the globe. This research applies to an extensive dataset that ranges to 23 years in 50 countries by enforcing robust dynamic econometric methods such as unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and generalized method of moments (GMM) estimations for the analysis of these complicated issues. The results show that Sustainable finance (SF) has a negative coefficient of -0.033, suggesting that increased sustainable financial practices contribute to reducing environmental degradation. Similarly, technology innovation (TI) and green energy (GE) both show significant negative impacts on environmental degradation, with coefficients of -0.132 and -0.075, respectively. The green growth index (GGI) has the most substantial negative effect, with a coefficient of -0.686, highlighting its critical role in mitigating environmental degradation. Lastly, the climate-related financial policy index (CRFPI) exhibits a positive coefficient of 0.029, indicating that advancements in financial policies targeting climate issues slightly offset environmental degradation. These results collectively emphasize the importance of financial, technological, and policy interventions in reducing environmental degradation. It also becomes clear that government spending and financial globalization both influence the efficacy of the government actions in reducing environmental pollution, while government efforts are affected by the second factor negatively. Those perceptions reveal why green finance that is advanced technologically along with renewable energy initiatives and governmental policy backing are the need of the hour in view of these very environmental challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"374 ","pages":"124047"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a green economy: Investigating the impact of sustainable finance, green technologies, and environmental policies on environmental degradation.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal, Wasim Abbas Saheen, Suheela Shabir, Usman Ullah, Ienciu Ionel-Alin, Marius-Ioan Mihut, António Raposo, Heesup Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Environmental degradation is a problem, and the consequences, in terms of emission of pollutants into different ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development are disastrous. This study explains the complex interactions that exist among sustainable finance, green technology innovation, green energy adoption, the climate change financial policy, green growth index, government spending, and financial globalization across the globe. This research applies to an extensive dataset that ranges to 23 years in 50 countries by enforcing robust dynamic econometric methods such as unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and generalized method of moments (GMM) estimations for the analysis of these complicated issues. The results show that Sustainable finance (SF) has a negative coefficient of -0.033, suggesting that increased sustainable financial practices contribute to reducing environmental degradation. Similarly, technology innovation (TI) and green energy (GE) both show significant negative impacts on environmental degradation, with coefficients of -0.132 and -0.075, respectively. The green growth index (GGI) has the most substantial negative effect, with a coefficient of -0.686, highlighting its critical role in mitigating environmental degradation. Lastly, the climate-related financial policy index (CRFPI) exhibits a positive coefficient of 0.029, indicating that advancements in financial policies targeting climate issues slightly offset environmental degradation. These results collectively emphasize the importance of financial, technological, and policy interventions in reducing environmental degradation. It also becomes clear that government spending and financial globalization both influence the efficacy of the government actions in reducing environmental pollution, while government efforts are affected by the second factor negatively. Those perceptions reveal why green finance that is advanced technologically along with renewable energy initiatives and governmental policy backing are the need of the hour in view of these very environmental challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"374 \",\"pages\":\"124047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境退化是一个问题,就污染物排放到不同的生态系统、人类健康和可持续发展而言,其后果是灾难性的。本研究解释了可持续金融、绿色技术创新、绿色能源采用、气候变化金融政策、绿色增长指数、政府支出和全球金融全球化之间存在的复杂相互作用。本研究通过实施稳健的动态计量经济学方法(如单位根检验、协整分析和广义矩量法(GMM)估计)来分析这些复杂问题,应用于50个国家长达23年的广泛数据集。结果表明,可持续金融(SF)的负系数为-0.033,表明增加可持续金融实践有助于减少环境退化。同样,技术创新(TI)和绿色能源(GE)对环境退化也表现出显著的负向影响,系数分别为-0.132和-0.075。绿色增长指数(GGI)负向效应最为显著,负向效应系数为-0.686,凸显了其在缓解环境退化中的关键作用。最后,气候相关金融政策指数(CRFPI)的正系数为0.029,表明针对气候问题的金融政策的进步略微抵消了环境退化。这些结果共同强调了财政、技术和政策干预在减少环境退化方面的重要性。政府支出和金融全球化都影响政府减少环境污染行动的有效性,而政府的努力受到第二个因素的负面影响。这些观点揭示了为什么在这些环境挑战面前,技术先进的绿色金融、可再生能源倡议和政府政策支持是当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a green economy: Investigating the impact of sustainable finance, green technologies, and environmental policies on environmental degradation.

Environmental degradation is a problem, and the consequences, in terms of emission of pollutants into different ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development are disastrous. This study explains the complex interactions that exist among sustainable finance, green technology innovation, green energy adoption, the climate change financial policy, green growth index, government spending, and financial globalization across the globe. This research applies to an extensive dataset that ranges to 23 years in 50 countries by enforcing robust dynamic econometric methods such as unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and generalized method of moments (GMM) estimations for the analysis of these complicated issues. The results show that Sustainable finance (SF) has a negative coefficient of -0.033, suggesting that increased sustainable financial practices contribute to reducing environmental degradation. Similarly, technology innovation (TI) and green energy (GE) both show significant negative impacts on environmental degradation, with coefficients of -0.132 and -0.075, respectively. The green growth index (GGI) has the most substantial negative effect, with a coefficient of -0.686, highlighting its critical role in mitigating environmental degradation. Lastly, the climate-related financial policy index (CRFPI) exhibits a positive coefficient of 0.029, indicating that advancements in financial policies targeting climate issues slightly offset environmental degradation. These results collectively emphasize the importance of financial, technological, and policy interventions in reducing environmental degradation. It also becomes clear that government spending and financial globalization both influence the efficacy of the government actions in reducing environmental pollution, while government efforts are affected by the second factor negatively. Those perceptions reveal why green finance that is advanced technologically along with renewable energy initiatives and governmental policy backing are the need of the hour in view of these very environmental challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of landscape structure and habitat quality in river corridors with ceased flow: A case study of the Yongding River corridor in Beijing, China. Sulfadiazine removal with low-cost structured nano and micro-composite hydrogel beads on moroccan clays with alginate-CMC-biochar. The impacts of alien species on river bioassessment. Understanding the impacts of ecological compensation policy on rural livelihoods: Insights from forest communities of China. Unveiling the effect of social networks on farmers' diversified energy-saving behaviors in the Tibetan plateau region of China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1