{"title":"内耳畸形和耳蜗解剖正常的人工耳蜗受者术中阻抗和ECAP的结果:回顾性分析。","authors":"Merve İkiz Bozsoy, Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Betül Koska, Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Nizamettin Burak Avcı, Selvet Akkaplan, Zeynep Budak Ateş, Betül Çiçek Çınar, Mehmet Yaralı, Merve Özbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel<sup>®</sup> and Cochlear (Nucleus<sup>®</sup>) CI devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance values differed through all regions, and that differences in ECAPs results mainly stemmed from the basal region in Cochlear users, when comparing the impedance values and ECAPs recording prevalence between the NCA and IEM groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference in the impedance values across the intracochlear regions of the groups (apical; <i>p</i> = .26, middle; <i>p</i> = .12, basal; <i>p</i> = .99). However, it was found that the prevalence of measurable ECAPs in all intracochlear regions of the NCA group was higher than the IEM group (<i>p</i> = .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>The robustness of cochlear structures is a crucial factor in the recording of ECAPs. Furthermore, findings in the IEM group demonstrated that proper placement of intracochlear electrodes did not guarantee effective auditory nerve stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative impedance and ECAP results in cochlear implant recipients with inner ear malformations and normal cochlear anatomy: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Merve İkiz Bozsoy, Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Betül Koska, Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Nizamettin Burak Avcı, Selvet Akkaplan, Zeynep Budak Ateş, Betül Çiçek Çınar, Mehmet Yaralı, Merve Özbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel<sup>®</sup> and Cochlear (Nucleus<sup>®</sup>) CI devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance values differed through all regions, and that differences in ECAPs results mainly stemmed from the basal region in Cochlear users, when comparing the impedance values and ECAPs recording prevalence between the NCA and IEM groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference in the impedance values across the intracochlear regions of the groups (apical; <i>p</i> = .26, middle; <i>p</i> = .12, basal; <i>p</i> = .99). However, it was found that the prevalence of measurable ECAPs in all intracochlear regions of the NCA group was higher than the IEM group (<i>p</i> = .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>The robustness of cochlear structures is a crucial factor in the recording of ECAPs. Furthermore, findings in the IEM group demonstrated that proper placement of intracochlear electrodes did not guarantee effective auditory nerve stimulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative impedance and ECAP results in cochlear implant recipients with inner ear malformations and normal cochlear anatomy: a retrospective analysis.
Background: The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.
Objectives: To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).
Material and methods: This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel® and Cochlear (Nucleus®) CI devices.
Results: Impedance values differed through all regions, and that differences in ECAPs results mainly stemmed from the basal region in Cochlear users, when comparing the impedance values and ECAPs recording prevalence between the NCA and IEM groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference in the impedance values across the intracochlear regions of the groups (apical; p = .26, middle; p = .12, basal; p = .99). However, it was found that the prevalence of measurable ECAPs in all intracochlear regions of the NCA group was higher than the IEM group (p = .000).
Conclusion and significance: The robustness of cochlear structures is a crucial factor in the recording of ECAPs. Furthermore, findings in the IEM group demonstrated that proper placement of intracochlear electrodes did not guarantee effective auditory nerve stimulation.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.