低容量罗哌卡因与大容量罗哌卡因在超声引导下双颌手术中上颌神经阻滞的有效性:一项随机非效性试验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9
Ming-Kai Chen, Le Zhao, Wei Luo, Kai Luo, Jie Lin, Yang Ji
{"title":"低容量罗哌卡因与大容量罗哌卡因在超声引导下双颌手术中上颌神经阻滞的有效性:一项随机非效性试验。","authors":"Ming-Kai Chen, Le Zhao, Wei Luo, Kai Luo, Jie Lin, Yang Ji","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block (UGMNB) is applied in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve perioperative analgesia, decrease the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and enhance recovery. However, the optimum volume of ropivacaine used for UGMNB is undetermined. Thus, it was hypothesized that in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery, low- and high-volume ropivacaine reduces perioperative pain with similar efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing double-jaw surgery were enrolled in a randomized non-inferiority trial to receive a bilateral single-injection UGMNB with 2 mL (low-volume [LV] group) or 5 mL (high-volume [HV] group) of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side. A visual analog scale (VAS) score for maxillary pain at 2 h postoperatively was taken as the primary outcome. VAS score for maxillary and mandibular pain at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, consumption of intraoperative opioids and sedatives, vasoactive medication use, extubation time, postoperative rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting and UGMNB-related complications within 48 h post-surgery were assessed as the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four adults were included. The maxillary pain score in the LV group was not inferior to that in the HV group at 2 h postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 (mean difference - 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.6 to 0.8, P = 0.414 for non-inferiority). Maxillary and mandibular pain demonstrated no difference in the measured times between groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly higher in the LV group than that in the HV group at 6-24 h (12 (37.5%) vs. 5 (15.6%), P = 0.048). Moreover, no differences in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, medications during anesthesia, time to extubation, rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, and postoperative vomiting were observed. Only one patient in the LV group was observed to have maxillary nerve block-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To conclude, the efficacy of UGMNB with 2 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine has the same efficacy as the 5 mL drug in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Low-Volume Versus High-Volume Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary Nerve Block in Double-Jaw Surgery: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Kai Chen, Le Zhao, Wei Luo, Kai Luo, Jie Lin, Yang Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block (UGMNB) is applied in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve perioperative analgesia, decrease the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and enhance recovery. However, the optimum volume of ropivacaine used for UGMNB is undetermined. Thus, it was hypothesized that in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery, low- and high-volume ropivacaine reduces perioperative pain with similar efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing double-jaw surgery were enrolled in a randomized non-inferiority trial to receive a bilateral single-injection UGMNB with 2 mL (low-volume [LV] group) or 5 mL (high-volume [HV] group) of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side. A visual analog scale (VAS) score for maxillary pain at 2 h postoperatively was taken as the primary outcome. VAS score for maxillary and mandibular pain at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, consumption of intraoperative opioids and sedatives, vasoactive medication use, extubation time, postoperative rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting and UGMNB-related complications within 48 h post-surgery were assessed as the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four adults were included. The maxillary pain score in the LV group was not inferior to that in the HV group at 2 h postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 (mean difference - 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.6 to 0.8, P = 0.414 for non-inferiority). Maxillary and mandibular pain demonstrated no difference in the measured times between groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly higher in the LV group than that in the HV group at 6-24 h (12 (37.5%) vs. 5 (15.6%), P = 0.048). Moreover, no differences in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, medications during anesthesia, time to extubation, rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, and postoperative vomiting were observed. Only one patient in the LV group was observed to have maxillary nerve block-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To conclude, the efficacy of UGMNB with 2 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine has the same efficacy as the 5 mL drug in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导下上颌神经阻滞(UGMNB)应用于口腔颌面外科手术,改善围手术期镇痛,降低术后恶心呕吐风险,促进恢复。然而,用于UGMNB的罗哌卡因的最佳用量尚未确定。因此,假设在接受双颌手术的患者中,低剂量和高剂量罗哌卡因减少围手术期疼痛的效果相似。方法:接受双颌手术的成人纳入随机非劣效性试验,接受双侧单次注射UGMNB,每侧注射0.375%罗哌卡因2 mL(低容量[LV]组)或5 mL(高容量[HV]组)。以术后2小时上颌疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)作为主要观察指标。以术后2、4、6、8、12、24、48 h上颌和下颌疼痛VAS评分、术中血流动力学变化、术中阿片类药物和镇静剂的使用、血管活性药物的使用、拔管时间、术后抢救镇痛、首次镇痛时间、术后恶心呕吐及术后48 h内ugmnb相关并发症作为次要结局。结果:纳入64名成年人。术后2 h, LV组上颌疼痛评分不低于HV组,非劣效差为1(平均差- 0.1;95%置信区间[CI] - 0.6 ~ 0.8,非劣效性P = 0.414)。上颌和下颌疼痛的测量时间在两组之间没有差异。术后6 ~ 24 h, LV组恶心发生率明显高于HV组(12例(37.5%)比5例(15.6%),P = 0.048)。此外,术中血流动力学参数、麻醉时用药、拔管时间、抢救镇痛时间、首次镇痛时间、术后呕吐均无差异。LV组仅有1例患者出现上颌神经阻滞相关并发症。结论:综上所述,UGMNB加用0.375%罗哌卡因2 mL与加用5 mL减轻双颌手术患者围手术期疼痛的疗效相同。证据等级i:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Low-Volume Versus High-Volume Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary Nerve Block in Double-Jaw Surgery: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial.

Background: Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block (UGMNB) is applied in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve perioperative analgesia, decrease the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and enhance recovery. However, the optimum volume of ropivacaine used for UGMNB is undetermined. Thus, it was hypothesized that in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery, low- and high-volume ropivacaine reduces perioperative pain with similar efficacy.

Methods: Adults undergoing double-jaw surgery were enrolled in a randomized non-inferiority trial to receive a bilateral single-injection UGMNB with 2 mL (low-volume [LV] group) or 5 mL (high-volume [HV] group) of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side. A visual analog scale (VAS) score for maxillary pain at 2 h postoperatively was taken as the primary outcome. VAS score for maxillary and mandibular pain at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, consumption of intraoperative opioids and sedatives, vasoactive medication use, extubation time, postoperative rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting and UGMNB-related complications within 48 h post-surgery were assessed as the secondary outcomes.

Results: Sixty-four adults were included. The maxillary pain score in the LV group was not inferior to that in the HV group at 2 h postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 (mean difference - 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.6 to 0.8, P = 0.414 for non-inferiority). Maxillary and mandibular pain demonstrated no difference in the measured times between groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly higher in the LV group than that in the HV group at 6-24 h (12 (37.5%) vs. 5 (15.6%), P = 0.048). Moreover, no differences in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, medications during anesthesia, time to extubation, rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, and postoperative vomiting were observed. Only one patient in the LV group was observed to have maxillary nerve block-related complications.

Conclusions: To conclude, the efficacy of UGMNB with 2 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine has the same efficacy as the 5 mL drug in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery.

Level of evidence i: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Extracorporeal Acoustic Shock Waves to Treat Complications of Polymethylmethacrylate. Experimental Study of the Biological Outcome After Free Transplantation of Autologous Auricular Cartilage. The Effectiveness of Bromelain on Oedema, Subconjunctival Haemorrhage, and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Comparison of Complication Rates of Different Autologous Gluteal Augmentation Techniques in 185 Consecutive Body Lift Surgeries in Massive Weight Loss Patients. Discovery of the Ligament of Modiolus: Anatomical Insights and Clinical Relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1