从人体动态15o -水PET图像中进行血流定量的区隔建模:系统回顾。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Annals of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x
Oona Rainio, Riku Klén
{"title":"从人体动态15o -水PET图像中进行血流定量的区隔建模:系统回顾。","authors":"Oona Rainio,&nbsp;Riku Klén","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to non-invasively estimate the blood flow of different organs via compartmental modeling. Out of different PET tracers, water labeled with the radioactive <span>\\(^{15}\\)</span>O isotope of oxygen (half-life of 2.04 min) is freely diffusable, and therefore, very well-suited for blood flow quantification. While the earlier <span>\\(^{15}\\)</span>O-water PET research has primarily focused on cerebral or myocardial blood flow quantification, the recent emergence of total-body PET scanners has enabled greater application possibilities for both PET imaging in general and also <span>\\(^{15}\\)</span>O-water PET based blood flow quantification in particular. However, to validate new methods, it is necessary to compare them to earlier research. To help in this process, we systematically review 53 articles quantifying blood flow via compartmental modeling. We introduce the articles organized within subcategories of cerebral, myocardial, renal, pulmonary, pancreatic, hepatic, muscle, and tumor blood flow and summarize their results so that they can easily be evaluated in terms of population characteristics of the patients such as age or sex ratio and their potential diagnoses. We compare how both the compartment model used and the potential corrections for arterial blood volume, non-perfusable tissue, spill-over from the heart cavities, and time delay caused while the tracer travels between different areas of interest are generally implemented in the articles. We also analyze the differences in the data pre-processing techniques. According to our results, the estimates of cerebral and tumor blood flow vary considerably more between the articles than those of myocardial blood flow. This might be caused by differences in the model approaches or the study populations. We also note that the choice of the unit for these estimates is quite inconsistent as certain researchers seem to prefer mL/min/g over mL/min/mL even if no weight or density parameter is present in the modeling. We encourage more research on sex- and age-based differences in blood flow estimates and organ-specific blood flow quantification studies for kidneys, lungs, liver, and other important organs besides brain and heart.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":"231 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compartmental modeling for blood flow quantification from dynamic \\\\(^{15}\\\\)O-water PET images of humans: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Oona Rainio,&nbsp;Riku Klén\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to non-invasively estimate the blood flow of different organs via compartmental modeling. Out of different PET tracers, water labeled with the radioactive <span>\\\\(^{15}\\\\)</span>O isotope of oxygen (half-life of 2.04 min) is freely diffusable, and therefore, very well-suited for blood flow quantification. While the earlier <span>\\\\(^{15}\\\\)</span>O-water PET research has primarily focused on cerebral or myocardial blood flow quantification, the recent emergence of total-body PET scanners has enabled greater application possibilities for both PET imaging in general and also <span>\\\\(^{15}\\\\)</span>O-water PET based blood flow quantification in particular. However, to validate new methods, it is necessary to compare them to earlier research. To help in this process, we systematically review 53 articles quantifying blood flow via compartmental modeling. We introduce the articles organized within subcategories of cerebral, myocardial, renal, pulmonary, pancreatic, hepatic, muscle, and tumor blood flow and summarize their results so that they can easily be evaluated in terms of population characteristics of the patients such as age or sex ratio and their potential diagnoses. We compare how both the compartment model used and the potential corrections for arterial blood volume, non-perfusable tissue, spill-over from the heart cavities, and time delay caused while the tracer travels between different areas of interest are generally implemented in the articles. We also analyze the differences in the data pre-processing techniques. According to our results, the estimates of cerebral and tumor blood flow vary considerably more between the articles than those of myocardial blood flow. This might be caused by differences in the model approaches or the study populations. We also note that the choice of the unit for these estimates is quite inconsistent as certain researchers seem to prefer mL/min/g over mL/min/mL even if no weight or density parameter is present in the modeling. We encourage more research on sex- and age-based differences in blood flow estimates and organ-specific blood flow quantification studies for kidneys, lungs, liver, and other important organs besides brain and heart.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"231 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动态正电子发射断层扫描(PET)可以通过室室建模来无创地估计不同器官的血流。在不同的PET示踪剂中,用氧的放射性15o同位素(半衰期为2.04分钟)标记的水是自由扩散的,因此非常适合于血流定量。虽然早期的15o -water PET研究主要集中在脑或心肌血流量化,但最近出现的全身PET扫描仪为PET成像提供了更大的应用可能性,特别是基于15o -water PET的血流量化。然而,为了验证新方法,有必要将它们与早期的研究进行比较。为了帮助这一过程,我们系统地回顾了53篇通过室室模型量化血流的文章。我们介绍了脑、心肌、肾、肺、胰腺、肝脏、肌肉和肿瘤血流亚类别的文章,并总结了他们的结果,以便他们可以很容易地根据患者的人口特征,如年龄或性别比例及其潜在的诊断进行评估。我们比较了所使用的隔室模型,以及文章中通常实现的对动脉血容量、不可灌注组织、心腔溢出和示踪剂在不同感兴趣区域之间移动时引起的时间延迟的潜在修正。我们还分析了数据预处理技术的差异。根据我们的结果,脑和肿瘤血流的估计在文章之间的差异比心肌血流的估计要大得多。这可能是由于模型方法或研究人群的差异造成的。我们还注意到,这些估计单位的选择是相当不一致的,因为某些研究人员似乎更喜欢mL/min/g而不是mL/min/mL,即使在建模中没有重量或密度参数。我们鼓励对基于性别和年龄的血流估计差异进行更多的研究,并对肾、肺、肝和除脑和心脏外的其他重要器官进行器官特异性血流量化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compartmental modeling for blood flow quantification from dynamic \(^{15}\)O-water PET images of humans: a systematic review

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to non-invasively estimate the blood flow of different organs via compartmental modeling. Out of different PET tracers, water labeled with the radioactive \(^{15}\)O isotope of oxygen (half-life of 2.04 min) is freely diffusable, and therefore, very well-suited for blood flow quantification. While the earlier \(^{15}\)O-water PET research has primarily focused on cerebral or myocardial blood flow quantification, the recent emergence of total-body PET scanners has enabled greater application possibilities for both PET imaging in general and also \(^{15}\)O-water PET based blood flow quantification in particular. However, to validate new methods, it is necessary to compare them to earlier research. To help in this process, we systematically review 53 articles quantifying blood flow via compartmental modeling. We introduce the articles organized within subcategories of cerebral, myocardial, renal, pulmonary, pancreatic, hepatic, muscle, and tumor blood flow and summarize their results so that they can easily be evaluated in terms of population characteristics of the patients such as age or sex ratio and their potential diagnoses. We compare how both the compartment model used and the potential corrections for arterial blood volume, non-perfusable tissue, spill-over from the heart cavities, and time delay caused while the tracer travels between different areas of interest are generally implemented in the articles. We also analyze the differences in the data pre-processing techniques. According to our results, the estimates of cerebral and tumor blood flow vary considerably more between the articles than those of myocardial blood flow. This might be caused by differences in the model approaches or the study populations. We also note that the choice of the unit for these estimates is quite inconsistent as certain researchers seem to prefer mL/min/g over mL/min/mL even if no weight or density parameter is present in the modeling. We encourage more research on sex- and age-based differences in blood flow estimates and organ-specific blood flow quantification studies for kidneys, lungs, liver, and other important organs besides brain and heart.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
The prognostic role of staging [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT volumetric and dissemination features in prostate cancer. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of VSBONE BSI versions for detecting bone metastases in breast and prostate carcinoma patients using conventional and CZT detector gamma cameras. Clinicopathologic and metabolic variables from 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of recurrence pattern in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer after curative surgery. Correction: Generative AI and large language models in nuclear medicine: current status and future prospects. Specific molecular imaging of BALB/c model mice with Graves' ophthalmopathy based on high expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1