三级淋巴结构在肺癌患者预后和免疫治疗反应中的预测作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13484-7
Xin Liu, Wu Lv, Danxue Huang, Hongxia Cui
{"title":"三级淋巴结构在肺癌患者预后和免疫治疗反应中的预测作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin Liu, Wu Lv, Danxue Huang, Hongxia Cui","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13484-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is still no consensus regarding the correlation between TLS and the prognosis of lung cancer patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between TLS and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. In addition, the prognostic value of TLS for the efficacy of immunotherapy was also studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from database inception to November 1, 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were extracted and merged with STATA 14.0. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024502483).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies comprising 4291 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that high TLS/TLS + patients had better OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88), DFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.64), DSS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39-0.60) and RFS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57). High TLS/TLS + patients tended to have longer PFS than low TLS/TLS + patients (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.35). Interestingly, in the Asia subgroup, the association between TLS and survival was especially significant, whereas there was no significant difference in Europe. In addition, in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, high TLS/TLS + was associated with prolonged DFS (HR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High TLS/TLS + was associated with improved survival and an improved response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in lung cancer patients, suggesting that TLS may be a prognostic biomarker and may also be a promising predictive marker for the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. However, additional original studies are needed to further confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive role of tertiary lymphoid structures in the prognosis and response to immunotherapy of lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Liu, Wu Lv, Danxue Huang, Hongxia Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-13484-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is still no consensus regarding the correlation between TLS and the prognosis of lung cancer patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between TLS and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. In addition, the prognostic value of TLS for the efficacy of immunotherapy was also studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from database inception to November 1, 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were extracted and merged with STATA 14.0. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024502483).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies comprising 4291 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that high TLS/TLS + patients had better OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88), DFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.64), DSS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39-0.60) and RFS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57). High TLS/TLS + patients tended to have longer PFS than low TLS/TLS + patients (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.35). Interestingly, in the Asia subgroup, the association between TLS and survival was especially significant, whereas there was no significant difference in Europe. In addition, in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, high TLS/TLS + was associated with prolonged DFS (HR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High TLS/TLS + was associated with improved survival and an improved response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in lung cancer patients, suggesting that TLS may be a prognostic biomarker and may also be a promising predictive marker for the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. However, additional original studies are needed to further confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13484-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13484-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:TLS与肺癌患者预后的相关性尚无共识。本荟萃分析旨在探讨TLS与肺癌患者预后的关系。此外,还研究了TLS对免疫治疗疗效的预后价值。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,检索时间为数据库建立至2023年11月1日。提取总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)的风险比(HR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI),并与STATA 14.0合并。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024502483)。结果:17项研究共纳入4291例患者。综合结果显示,高TLS/TLS +患者有更好的OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88)、DFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.64)、DSS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39-0.60)和RFS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57)。高TLS/TLS +患者往往比低TLS/TLS +患者有更长的PFS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.35)。有趣的是,在亚洲亚组中,TLS与生存率之间的关联尤为显著,而在欧洲则没有显著差异。此外,在接受新辅助化疗免疫治疗的患者中,高TLS/TLS +与延长的DFS相关(HR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.93)。结论:高TLS/TLS +与肺癌患者的生存率提高和对新辅助化疗免疫治疗的反应提高相关,提示TLS可能是一种预后生物标志物,也可能是新辅助化疗免疫治疗反应的一个有希望的预测标志物。然而,需要更多的原始研究来进一步证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The predictive role of tertiary lymphoid structures in the prognosis and response to immunotherapy of lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There is still no consensus regarding the correlation between TLS and the prognosis of lung cancer patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between TLS and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. In addition, the prognostic value of TLS for the efficacy of immunotherapy was also studied.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from database inception to November 1, 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were extracted and merged with STATA 14.0. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024502483).

Results: A total of 17 studies comprising 4291 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that high TLS/TLS + patients had better OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88), DFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.64), DSS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39-0.60) and RFS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57). High TLS/TLS + patients tended to have longer PFS than low TLS/TLS + patients (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.35). Interestingly, in the Asia subgroup, the association between TLS and survival was especially significant, whereas there was no significant difference in Europe. In addition, in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, high TLS/TLS + was associated with prolonged DFS (HR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.93).

Conclusion: High TLS/TLS + was associated with improved survival and an improved response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in lung cancer patients, suggesting that TLS may be a prognostic biomarker and may also be a promising predictive marker for the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. However, additional original studies are needed to further confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Surgery lengthens survival for collecting duct carcinoma: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan. Integrating BRCA testing into routine prostate cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach by SIUrO and other Italian Scientific Societies. Improved diagnosis of small cervical lymph node metastasis using postvascular phase perfluorobutane CEUS in cancer patients. The impact of educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on preventive behaviors for gastric cancer in obese and smoking individuals. The impact of oxidative balance on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in US adults and cancer survivors: evidence from NHANES 2001-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1