静脉降压治疗对脑血流和神经认知的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.007
Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Kevin M Backfish-White, Lingzhong Meng
{"title":"静脉降压治疗对脑血流和神经认知的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Kevin M Backfish-White, Lingzhong Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous antihypertensivedrugs are commonly used in acute care settings, yet their impact on cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies evaluated the effects of commonly used i.v. antihypertensive agents on CBF in normotensive, hypertensive, and intracranial pathology populations. Meta-analyses used standardised mean differences (SMD), stratified by population type, consciousness state, antihypertensive agent, and CBF measurement method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intravenous antihypertensivedrug therapy significantly reduced CBF in normotensive individuals without intracranial pathology (SMD -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to -0.11), primarily driven by nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in awake subjects (SMD -0.80, 95% confidence interval -1.15 to -0.46), with a median CBF decrease of 14% (interquartile range 13-16%) and a median mean arterial pressure reduction of 17% (interquartile range 9-22%). Other antihypertensives showed no significant effects on CBF in normotensive individuals, nor were changes observed in hypertensive patients or those with intracranial pathology when the median mean arterial pressure reduction was ∼20%. No correlation was found between mean arterial pressure reduction and CBF change, supporting intact cerebral autoregulation. Historical data revealed neurocognitive changes when CBF fell to ∼30 ml 100 g<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>, associated with a 58% mean arterial pressure reduction and a 38% CBF reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most i.v. antihypertensive agents do not significantly affect CBF in clinical dose ranges; however, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin can reduce CBF under specific clinical conditions. The certainty of evidence remains low. Neurocognitive changes appear to depend on the magnitude of blood pressure and CBF reductions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review protocol: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024511954).</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intravenous antihypertensive therapy on cerebral blood flow and neurocognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Kevin M Backfish-White, Lingzhong Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous antihypertensivedrugs are commonly used in acute care settings, yet their impact on cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies evaluated the effects of commonly used i.v. antihypertensive agents on CBF in normotensive, hypertensive, and intracranial pathology populations. Meta-analyses used standardised mean differences (SMD), stratified by population type, consciousness state, antihypertensive agent, and CBF measurement method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intravenous antihypertensivedrug therapy significantly reduced CBF in normotensive individuals without intracranial pathology (SMD -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to -0.11), primarily driven by nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in awake subjects (SMD -0.80, 95% confidence interval -1.15 to -0.46), with a median CBF decrease of 14% (interquartile range 13-16%) and a median mean arterial pressure reduction of 17% (interquartile range 9-22%). Other antihypertensives showed no significant effects on CBF in normotensive individuals, nor were changes observed in hypertensive patients or those with intracranial pathology when the median mean arterial pressure reduction was ∼20%. No correlation was found between mean arterial pressure reduction and CBF change, supporting intact cerebral autoregulation. Historical data revealed neurocognitive changes when CBF fell to ∼30 ml 100 g<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>, associated with a 58% mean arterial pressure reduction and a 38% CBF reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most i.v. antihypertensive agents do not significantly affect CBF in clinical dose ranges; however, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin can reduce CBF under specific clinical conditions. The certainty of evidence remains low. Neurocognitive changes appear to depend on the magnitude of blood pressure and CBF reductions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review protocol: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024511954).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉注射抗高血压药物通常用于急性护理环境,但其对脑血流量(CBF)的影响仍不确定。方法:对50项研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估常用静脉注射降压药对正常血压、高血压和颅内病理人群CBF的影响。meta分析采用标准化平均差异(SMD),按人群类型、意识状态、抗高血压药物和CBF测量方法分层。结果:静脉降压药物治疗显著降低无颅内病理的正常血压个体的CBF (SMD -0.31, 95%可信区间-0.51至-0.11),主要由硝普苷和硝酸甘油在清醒受试者(SMD -0.80, 95%可信区间-1.15至-0.46)驱动,CBF中位数下降14%(四分位数范围13-16%),平均动脉压中位数下降17%(四分位数范围9-22%)。其他降压药对正常血压个体的CBF没有显著影响,当平均动脉压中值降低约20%时,高血压患者或颅内病变患者也没有观察到变化。平均动脉压降低与脑血流变化之间未发现相关性,支持完整的大脑自动调节。历史数据显示,当CBF降至~ 30 ml 100 g-1 min-1时,神经认知发生变化,平均动脉压降低58%,CBF降低38%。结论:大多数静脉注射降压药在临床剂量范围内对CBF无显著影响;然而,在特定的临床条件下,硝普和硝酸甘油可以降低CBF。证据的确定性仍然很低。神经认知变化似乎取决于血压和脑血流减少的幅度。系统评价方案:PROSPERO (CRD42024511954)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of intravenous antihypertensive therapy on cerebral blood flow and neurocognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Intravenous antihypertensivedrugs are commonly used in acute care settings, yet their impact on cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains uncertain.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies evaluated the effects of commonly used i.v. antihypertensive agents on CBF in normotensive, hypertensive, and intracranial pathology populations. Meta-analyses used standardised mean differences (SMD), stratified by population type, consciousness state, antihypertensive agent, and CBF measurement method.

Results: Intravenous antihypertensivedrug therapy significantly reduced CBF in normotensive individuals without intracranial pathology (SMD -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to -0.11), primarily driven by nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in awake subjects (SMD -0.80, 95% confidence interval -1.15 to -0.46), with a median CBF decrease of 14% (interquartile range 13-16%) and a median mean arterial pressure reduction of 17% (interquartile range 9-22%). Other antihypertensives showed no significant effects on CBF in normotensive individuals, nor were changes observed in hypertensive patients or those with intracranial pathology when the median mean arterial pressure reduction was ∼20%. No correlation was found between mean arterial pressure reduction and CBF change, supporting intact cerebral autoregulation. Historical data revealed neurocognitive changes when CBF fell to ∼30 ml 100 g-1 min-1, associated with a 58% mean arterial pressure reduction and a 38% CBF reduction.

Conclusions: Most i.v. antihypertensive agents do not significantly affect CBF in clinical dose ranges; however, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin can reduce CBF under specific clinical conditions. The certainty of evidence remains low. Neurocognitive changes appear to depend on the magnitude of blood pressure and CBF reductions.

Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42024511954).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
The number of central nervous system-driven symptoms predicts subsequent chronic primary pain: evidence from UK Biobank. The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light. Response to Br J Anaesth 2024; 133: 1352-3. Two-person verbal check to confirm tracheal intubation: evaluation of practice changes to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Clinical team flow in the perioperative environment: a qualitative single-centre study. Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1