先进治疗药物产品的价值属性:在英国国家健康和护理卓越研究所报销决策期间收到的利益相关者评论的文献分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2025.2455405
Nermina Ferizovic, Ruth Plackett, Caroline S Clarke, Rachael Hunter, Nick Freemantle
{"title":"先进治疗药物产品的价值属性:在英国国家健康和护理卓越研究所报销决策期间收到的利益相关者评论的文献分析。","authors":"Nermina Ferizovic, Ruth Plackett, Caroline S Clarke, Rachael Hunter, Nick Freemantle","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2455405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are transformative healthcare interventions, however, there has been limited research exploring their value. The objective of this study was to conduct a thematic analysis as part of a documentary analysis to identify value attributes of ATMPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the NICE assessment processes in England, stakeholders are invited to provide comments on the technology. Nineteen NICE technology assessments (TAs) related to ATMPs were identified and subsequently included in a thematic analysis. All codes (and themes) were generated inductively from the text to reduce bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the attributes of value of ATMPs can be categorized into three themes: treatment factors, innovation factors, and wider factors. That is, attributes of value of these interventions include not only direct treatment factors, although this was the largest category, but also additional factors such as those related to innovation and wider impacts the intervention may have, beyond the patient receiving therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This thematic analysis of stakeholder comments submitted to NICE as part of TAs for ATMPs enhances the understanding of attributes of value of ATMPs. The findings are applicable to a wider geography.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value attributes of advanced therapy medicinal products: a documentary analysis of comments received from stakeholders during reimbursement decisions to England's National Institute of Health and Care Excellence.\",\"authors\":\"Nermina Ferizovic, Ruth Plackett, Caroline S Clarke, Rachael Hunter, Nick Freemantle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2455405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are transformative healthcare interventions, however, there has been limited research exploring their value. The objective of this study was to conduct a thematic analysis as part of a documentary analysis to identify value attributes of ATMPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the NICE assessment processes in England, stakeholders are invited to provide comments on the technology. Nineteen NICE technology assessments (TAs) related to ATMPs were identified and subsequently included in a thematic analysis. All codes (and themes) were generated inductively from the text to reduce bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the attributes of value of ATMPs can be categorized into three themes: treatment factors, innovation factors, and wider factors. That is, attributes of value of these interventions include not only direct treatment factors, although this was the largest category, but also additional factors such as those related to innovation and wider impacts the intervention may have, beyond the patient receiving therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This thematic analysis of stakeholder comments submitted to NICE as part of TAs for ATMPs enhances the understanding of attributes of value of ATMPs. The findings are applicable to a wider geography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2455405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2455405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先进治疗药物(atmp)是变革性的医疗保健干预措施,然而,探索其价值的研究有限。本研究的目的是进行专题分析,作为文献分析的一部分,以确定atmp的价值属性。方法:作为英格兰NICE评估过程的一部分,邀请利益相关者对该技术提供评论。确定了与atmp相关的19项NICE技术评估(ta),并随后将其纳入专题分析。所有代码(和主题)都是从文本中归纳生成的,以减少偏见。结果:本研究发现,atmp的价值属性可分为三个主题:治疗因素、创新因素和更广泛因素。也就是说,这些干预措施的价值属性不仅包括直接治疗因素(尽管这是最大的类别),还包括其他因素,如与创新有关的因素和干预措施可能产生的更广泛的影响,超出了接受治疗的患者。结论:作为atmp TAs的一部分,对提交给NICE的利益相关者意见的主题分析增强了对atmp价值属性的理解。研究结果适用于更广泛的地理区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value attributes of advanced therapy medicinal products: a documentary analysis of comments received from stakeholders during reimbursement decisions to England's National Institute of Health and Care Excellence.

Objectives: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are transformative healthcare interventions, however, there has been limited research exploring their value. The objective of this study was to conduct a thematic analysis as part of a documentary analysis to identify value attributes of ATMPs.

Methods: As part of the NICE assessment processes in England, stakeholders are invited to provide comments on the technology. Nineteen NICE technology assessments (TAs) related to ATMPs were identified and subsequently included in a thematic analysis. All codes (and themes) were generated inductively from the text to reduce bias.

Results: This study found that the attributes of value of ATMPs can be categorized into three themes: treatment factors, innovation factors, and wider factors. That is, attributes of value of these interventions include not only direct treatment factors, although this was the largest category, but also additional factors such as those related to innovation and wider impacts the intervention may have, beyond the patient receiving therapy.

Conclusions: This thematic analysis of stakeholder comments submitted to NICE as part of TAs for ATMPs enhances the understanding of attributes of value of ATMPs. The findings are applicable to a wider geography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Preferences of nurses in the United Kingdom for attributes of pediatric hexavalent vaccines: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient-relevance of outcome measures in breast cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient preferences and trials conducted between 2014 and 2024. Evaluation of biological drug consumption in Italy during 2022: a comparative analysis between two healthcare facilities. Cost comparison of F(ab')2 and Fab antivenoms for pit viper envenomation in the United States: a real-world analysis. Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1