一个开源的卷积神经网络,用于检测和定位桡骨远端骨折平片。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02731-4
Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Britt Barvelink, Jasper Prijs, Yang Zhao, Zhibin Liao, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Frank F A IJpma, Joost W Colaris, Job N Doornberg, Mathieu M E Wijffels
{"title":"一个开源的卷积神经网络,用于检测和定位桡骨远端骨折平片。","authors":"Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Britt Barvelink, Jasper Prijs, Yang Zhao, Zhibin Liao, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Frank F A IJpma, Joost W Colaris, Job N Doornberg, Mathieu M E Wijffels","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02731-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are often initially assessed by junior doctors under time constraints, with limited supervision, risking significant consequences if missed. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can aid in diagnosing fractures. This study aims to internally and externally validate an open source algorithm for the detection and localization of DRFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from a level 1 trauma center from Adelaide, Australia that presented between 2016 and 2020 with wrist trauma were retrospectively included. Radiographs were reviewed confirming the presence or absence of a fracture, as well as annotating radius, ulna, and fracture location. An internal validation dataset from the same hospital was created. An external validation set was created with two other level 1 trauma centers, from Groningen and Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Three surgeons reviewed both sets for DRFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm was trained on 659 radiographs. The internal validation set included 190 patients, showing an accuracy of 87% and an AUC of 0.93 for DRF detection. The external validation set consisted of 188 patients, with an accuracy and AUC were 82% and 0.88 respectively. Radial and ulnar bone segmentation on the internal validation was excellent with an AP50 of 99 and 98, but moderate for fracture segmentation with an AP50 of 29. For external validation the AP50 was 92, 89 and 25 for radius, ulna, and fracture respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This open-source algorithm effectively detects DRFs with high accuracy and localizes them with moderate accuracy. It can assist clinicians in diagnosing suspected DRFs and is the first radiograph-based CNN externally validated on patients from multiple hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open source convolutional neural network to detect and localize distal radius fractures on plain radiographs.\",\"authors\":\"Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Britt Barvelink, Jasper Prijs, Yang Zhao, Zhibin Liao, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Frank F A IJpma, Joost W Colaris, Job N Doornberg, Mathieu M E Wijffels\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-024-02731-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are often initially assessed by junior doctors under time constraints, with limited supervision, risking significant consequences if missed. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can aid in diagnosing fractures. This study aims to internally and externally validate an open source algorithm for the detection and localization of DRFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from a level 1 trauma center from Adelaide, Australia that presented between 2016 and 2020 with wrist trauma were retrospectively included. Radiographs were reviewed confirming the presence or absence of a fracture, as well as annotating radius, ulna, and fracture location. An internal validation dataset from the same hospital was created. An external validation set was created with two other level 1 trauma centers, from Groningen and Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Three surgeons reviewed both sets for DRFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm was trained on 659 radiographs. The internal validation set included 190 patients, showing an accuracy of 87% and an AUC of 0.93 for DRF detection. The external validation set consisted of 188 patients, with an accuracy and AUC were 82% and 0.88 respectively. Radial and ulnar bone segmentation on the internal validation was excellent with an AP50 of 99 and 98, but moderate for fracture segmentation with an AP50 of 29. For external validation the AP50 was 92, 89 and 25 for radius, ulna, and fracture respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This open-source algorithm effectively detects DRFs with high accuracy and localizes them with moderate accuracy. It can assist clinicians in diagnosing suspected DRFs and is the first radiograph-based CNN externally validated on patients from multiple hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742337/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02731-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02731-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)通常由初级医生在时间限制下进行初步评估,监督有限,如果错过可能会造成严重后果。卷积神经网络(cnn)可以帮助诊断骨折。本研究旨在内部和外部验证一种用于drf检测和定位的开源算法。方法:回顾性纳入2016年至2020年间来自澳大利亚阿德莱德一家一级创伤中心的腕关节创伤患者。检查x线片,确认骨折是否存在,并注释桡骨、尺骨和骨折位置。创建了来自同一家医院的内部验证数据集。与荷兰格罗宁根和鹿特丹的另外两个一级创伤中心一起创建了一个外部验证集。三名外科医生检查了两组DRFs。结果:该算法对659张x线片进行了训练。内部验证集包括190例患者,DRF检测的准确率为87%,AUC为0.93。外部验证集包括188例患者,准确度和AUC分别为82%和0.88。桡骨和尺骨的内部分割AP50分别为99和98,但骨折分割AP50为29,为中等。对于外部验证,桡骨、尺骨和骨折的AP50分别为92、89和25。结论:该开源算法检测drf精度高,定位精度中等。它可以帮助临床医生诊断疑似drf,并且是第一个在多家医院的患者中进行外部验证的基于x线片的CNN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An open source convolutional neural network to detect and localize distal radius fractures on plain radiographs.

Purpose: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are often initially assessed by junior doctors under time constraints, with limited supervision, risking significant consequences if missed. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can aid in diagnosing fractures. This study aims to internally and externally validate an open source algorithm for the detection and localization of DRFs.

Methods: Patients from a level 1 trauma center from Adelaide, Australia that presented between 2016 and 2020 with wrist trauma were retrospectively included. Radiographs were reviewed confirming the presence or absence of a fracture, as well as annotating radius, ulna, and fracture location. An internal validation dataset from the same hospital was created. An external validation set was created with two other level 1 trauma centers, from Groningen and Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Three surgeons reviewed both sets for DRFs.

Results: The algorithm was trained on 659 radiographs. The internal validation set included 190 patients, showing an accuracy of 87% and an AUC of 0.93 for DRF detection. The external validation set consisted of 188 patients, with an accuracy and AUC were 82% and 0.88 respectively. Radial and ulnar bone segmentation on the internal validation was excellent with an AP50 of 99 and 98, but moderate for fracture segmentation with an AP50 of 29. For external validation the AP50 was 92, 89 and 25 for radius, ulna, and fracture respectively.

Conclusion: This open-source algorithm effectively detects DRFs with high accuracy and localizes them with moderate accuracy. It can assist clinicians in diagnosing suspected DRFs and is the first radiograph-based CNN externally validated on patients from multiple hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical rib fixation in patients with cardiopulmonary disease improves outcomes. The role of serum vaspin level in the early diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia induced in experimental animal model. Examining the impact of validated handover protocols on treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1