外伤性脑损伤的外科干预:减压开颅术的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02725-2
Mubarak Algahtany, Amit Kumar, Malik Algahtany, Maan Alqahtani, Musaab Alnaami, Aws Algahtany, Majed Aldehri, Ibrahim Alnaami
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤的外科干预:减压开颅术的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mubarak Algahtany, Amit Kumar, Malik Algahtany, Maan Alqahtani, Musaab Alnaami, Aws Algahtany, Majed Aldehri, Ibrahim Alnaami","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02725-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered a major cause of death globally, resulting from trauma. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) may improve functional outcomes in patients with TBI and its associated complications. This study was designed to determine safety and efficacy of DC in improving clinical outcomes in TBI patients compared to standard therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across six electronic databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining decompressive craniotomy (DC) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) from database inception until March 2021. The pooled risk ratio was estimated for categorical outcomes, while the pooled standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis software, including RevMan 5.4 and STATA version 17, was employed to perform this meta-analysis. The protocol for this study is registered with the OSF registry, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 656 studies were screened, and five RCTs involving 665 subjects (334 in the DC group and 331 in the control group) were included in this meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a non-significant trend towards a higher rate of favorable clinical outcomes in subjects who underwent DC compared to those in the medical treatment (MT) group (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.08, P = 0.50). In contrast, the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients treated with DC compared to those receiving MT alone (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.73, P < 0.001). Additionally, intracranial pressure (ICP) levels were significantly lower in subjects who underwent DC compared to those receiving MT alone (standardized mean difference (SMD): - 0.87, 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.16, P = 0.02). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant reduction in the duration of stay in the DC group compared to the MT alone group (SMD: - 1.18, 95% CI - 1.49 to - 0.86, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents evidence suggesting that DC is linked to a lower mortality rate, decreased ICP, and shorter hospital stays among patients with moderate to severe TBI. However, it did not show a significant impact on improving favorable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical intervention in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompressive craniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Mubarak Algahtany, Amit Kumar, Malik Algahtany, Maan Alqahtani, Musaab Alnaami, Aws Algahtany, Majed Aldehri, Ibrahim Alnaami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-024-02725-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered a major cause of death globally, resulting from trauma. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) may improve functional outcomes in patients with TBI and its associated complications. This study was designed to determine safety and efficacy of DC in improving clinical outcomes in TBI patients compared to standard therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across six electronic databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining decompressive craniotomy (DC) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) from database inception until March 2021. The pooled risk ratio was estimated for categorical outcomes, while the pooled standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis software, including RevMan 5.4 and STATA version 17, was employed to perform this meta-analysis. The protocol for this study is registered with the OSF registry, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 656 studies were screened, and five RCTs involving 665 subjects (334 in the DC group and 331 in the control group) were included in this meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a non-significant trend towards a higher rate of favorable clinical outcomes in subjects who underwent DC compared to those in the medical treatment (MT) group (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.08, P = 0.50). In contrast, the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients treated with DC compared to those receiving MT alone (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.73, P < 0.001). Additionally, intracranial pressure (ICP) levels were significantly lower in subjects who underwent DC compared to those receiving MT alone (standardized mean difference (SMD): - 0.87, 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.16, P = 0.02). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant reduction in the duration of stay in the DC group compared to the MT alone group (SMD: - 1.18, 95% CI - 1.49 to - 0.86, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents evidence suggesting that DC is linked to a lower mortality rate, decreased ICP, and shorter hospital stays among patients with moderate to severe TBI. However, it did not show a significant impact on improving favorable clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02725-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02725-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)被认为是全球范围内由创伤引起的主要死亡原因。减压颅骨切除术(DC)可能改善TBI患者及其相关并发症的功能结局。本研究旨在确定与标准治疗相比,DC在改善TBI患者临床结果方面的安全性和有效性。方法:对6个电子数据库进行系统检索,以确定从数据库建立到2021年3月期间检查减压开颅术(DC)和创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的相关随机对照试验(rct)。对分类结果估计合并风险比,对连续结果计算95%置信区间的合并标准化平均差。采用统计分析软件RevMan 5.4和STATA version 17进行meta分析。本研究的方案已在OSF注册中心注册,以确保透明度和可重复性。结果:共筛选656项研究,共纳入5项rct,涉及665名受试者(DC组334名,对照组331名)。我们的荟萃分析显示,与医学治疗(MT)组相比,接受DC治疗的受试者的良好临床转归率呈非显著性趋势(风险比(RR) 1.20, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.70至2.08,P = 0.50)。相比之下,与单独接受MT治疗的患者相比,接受DC治疗的患者死亡率显著降低(RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47至0.73,P)。结论:本研究提供的证据表明,在中重度TBI患者中,DC与较低的死亡率、较低的ICP和较短的住院时间有关。然而,它对改善有利的临床结果没有显着影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical intervention in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompressive craniotomy.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered a major cause of death globally, resulting from trauma. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) may improve functional outcomes in patients with TBI and its associated complications. This study was designed to determine safety and efficacy of DC in improving clinical outcomes in TBI patients compared to standard therapy.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across six electronic databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining decompressive craniotomy (DC) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) from database inception until March 2021. The pooled risk ratio was estimated for categorical outcomes, while the pooled standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis software, including RevMan 5.4 and STATA version 17, was employed to perform this meta-analysis. The protocol for this study is registered with the OSF registry, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.

Results: A total of 656 studies were screened, and five RCTs involving 665 subjects (334 in the DC group and 331 in the control group) were included in this meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a non-significant trend towards a higher rate of favorable clinical outcomes in subjects who underwent DC compared to those in the medical treatment (MT) group (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.08, P = 0.50). In contrast, the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients treated with DC compared to those receiving MT alone (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.73, P < 0.001). Additionally, intracranial pressure (ICP) levels were significantly lower in subjects who underwent DC compared to those receiving MT alone (standardized mean difference (SMD): - 0.87, 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.16, P = 0.02). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant reduction in the duration of stay in the DC group compared to the MT alone group (SMD: - 1.18, 95% CI - 1.49 to - 0.86, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study presents evidence suggesting that DC is linked to a lower mortality rate, decreased ICP, and shorter hospital stays among patients with moderate to severe TBI. However, it did not show a significant impact on improving favorable clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical rib fixation in patients with cardiopulmonary disease improves outcomes. The role of serum vaspin level in the early diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia induced in experimental animal model. Examining the impact of validated handover protocols on treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1