改良单切口MIS-TLIF伴可扩管辅助治疗腰椎退行性疾病。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067
Wenlong Hu, Fei He, Kai Sun, Haiwu Wan, Sijun Ruan, Bo Huang
{"title":"改良单切口MIS-TLIF伴可扩管辅助治疗腰椎退行性疾病。","authors":"Wenlong Hu, Fei He, Kai Sun, Haiwu Wan, Sijun Ruan, Bo Huang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1482067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified single-incision MIS-TLIF with expandable tubular assistance for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Wenlong Hu, Fei He, Kai Sun, Haiwu Wan, Sijun Ruan, Bo Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1482067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价改良单切口后正中入路伴扩管辅助腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析我院脊柱外科2017年1月至2021年12月收治的121例单节段退行性腰椎疾病患者。其中,72例患者采用改良的单切口后正中入路可扩管辅助腰椎椎体间融合术(单切口MIS-TLIF组),49例患者采用经典的开放式后正中切口P-TLIF(开放式手术组)。我们收集了基本的人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、BMI和手术水平。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生率等手术相关指标。同时对实验室结果[全血c反应蛋白(CRP)、血清肌酸激酶(CK)]和临床结果[腰腿疼痛VAS评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、改良MacNab标准优良率和Brantigan标准体间融合率]进行评估。结果:两组患者基本人口统计学差异无统计学意义。两组间的手术时间、术后住院时间和住院费用也相似。然而,两组在术中出血量、术后引流和并发症发生率方面存在显著差异。术后第1、3天,两组间全血CRP、CK水平差异有统计学意义。在术后3、6和12个月,与开放手术组相比,单切口MIS-TLIF组背部疼痛的ODI评分和VAS评分较低。单切口MIS-TLIF组的MacNab标准优良率较高。两组术后12个月腿部疼痛VAS评分和椎间融合率无显著差异。结论:改良单切口后正中入路可扩管辅助腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病疗效显著。术后疼痛更少,恢复更快,术后功能结果显著改善,使其成为一种有价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified single-incision MIS-TLIF with expandable tubular assistance for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Objective: Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.

Result: There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.

Conclusion: The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of artery injury types and clinical characteristics of patients with transcatheter angioembolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comprehensive surgery of complex scalp arteriovenous fistula: a successful trial. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic central pancreatectomy for complete pancreatic transection trauma: a rare case and literature review. Relationship between serum ECP and TIgE levels and the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Corrigendum: Case Report: A rare presentation of rapidly progressive moyamoya disease refractory to unilateral surgical revascularization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1