Frederik van den Heuvel, Elif Aribas, Martijn J Tilly, Sven Geurts, Shuyue Yang, Zuolin Lu, Natasja M S de Groot, Annemien E van den Bosch, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Robin Peeters, Frans Rutten, Geert-Jan Geersing, Joost van Rosmalen, M Arfan Ikram, Robin Nijveldt, Alexander Hirsch, Maryam Kavousi
{"title":"纵向心脏成像用于评估COVID-19感染后非住院社区居民心肌损伤:鹿特丹研究","authors":"Frederik van den Heuvel, Elif Aribas, Martijn J Tilly, Sven Geurts, Shuyue Yang, Zuolin Lu, Natasja M S de Groot, Annemien E van den Bosch, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Robin Peeters, Frans Rutten, Geert-Jan Geersing, Joost van Rosmalen, M Arfan Ikram, Robin Nijveldt, Alexander Hirsch, Maryam Kavousi","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the presence of myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation between persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and myocardial function in participants with known cardiovascular health status before infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study cohort, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were performed among participants who recovered from COVID-19 at home within 2 years prior to inclusion in the current study. Persistent cardiac symptoms comprised only self-reported symptoms of chest pain, dyspnoea or palpitations lasting >4 weeks after COVID-19 infection. We used linear regression and linear mixed models to estimate and test age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) of (1) post-COVID-19 CMR-derived and echocardiographic-derived parameters among participants with and without persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms and (2) pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiographic assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 participants were included, with a mean age of 59±8 years of whom 52% were male. Normal post-COVID-19 CMR-derived left ventricular (LV) function and right ventricular ejection fraction were observed in 92% and 98% of participants, respectively. We observed normal native T1 relaxation times in 100%, normal extracellular volume in 98% and normal T2 relaxation times in 98% of the participants. Comparison of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiography revealed a significant but small decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (adjusted mean change -1.37% (95% CI -2.57%, -0.17%)) and global longitudinal strain (1.32% (95% CI 0.50%, 2.15%)). Comparing participants with and without persistent symptoms, there were no significant differences in adjusted CMR-derived ventricular volumes, LV function or presence of myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost all recovered non-hospitalised COVID-19 participants had normal CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function, without relevant myocardial injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal cardiac imaging for assessment of myocardial injury in non-hospitalised community-dwelling individuals after COVID-19 infection: the Rotterdam Study.\",\"authors\":\"Frederik van den Heuvel, Elif Aribas, Martijn J Tilly, Sven Geurts, Shuyue Yang, Zuolin Lu, Natasja M S de Groot, Annemien E van den Bosch, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Robin Peeters, Frans Rutten, Geert-Jan Geersing, Joost van Rosmalen, M Arfan Ikram, Robin Nijveldt, Alexander Hirsch, Maryam Kavousi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the presence of myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation between persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and myocardial function in participants with known cardiovascular health status before infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study cohort, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were performed among participants who recovered from COVID-19 at home within 2 years prior to inclusion in the current study. Persistent cardiac symptoms comprised only self-reported symptoms of chest pain, dyspnoea or palpitations lasting >4 weeks after COVID-19 infection. We used linear regression and linear mixed models to estimate and test age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) of (1) post-COVID-19 CMR-derived and echocardiographic-derived parameters among participants with and without persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms and (2) pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiographic assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 participants were included, with a mean age of 59±8 years of whom 52% were male. Normal post-COVID-19 CMR-derived left ventricular (LV) function and right ventricular ejection fraction were observed in 92% and 98% of participants, respectively. We observed normal native T1 relaxation times in 100%, normal extracellular volume in 98% and normal T2 relaxation times in 98% of the participants. Comparison of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiography revealed a significant but small decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (adjusted mean change -1.37% (95% CI -2.57%, -0.17%)) and global longitudinal strain (1.32% (95% CI 0.50%, 2.15%)). Comparing participants with and without persistent symptoms, there were no significant differences in adjusted CMR-derived ventricular volumes, LV function or presence of myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost all recovered non-hospitalised COVID-19 participants had normal CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function, without relevant myocardial injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324316\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是评估COVID-19感染后心肌损伤的存在,并评估感染前心血管健康状况已知的参与者COVID-19感染后持续心脏症状与心肌功能的关系。方法:在前瞻性人群为基础的鹿特丹研究队列中,对纳入本研究前2年内在家康复的COVID-19患者进行超声心动图和心血管磁共振(CMR)检查。持续性心脏症状仅包括自我报告的胸痛、呼吸困难或心悸症状,在COVID-19感染后持续4周。我们使用线性回归和线性混合模型来估计和检验年龄调整和性别调整后的平均差异(95% ci)(1)在有和没有持续的covid -19后症状的参与者中,covid -19后cmr衍生参数和超声心动图衍生参数;(2)covid -19前和covid -19后超声心动图评估。结果:纳入92例受试者,平均年龄59±8岁,其中52%为男性。covid -19后cmr衍生左心室(LV)功能和右心室射血分数分别在92%和98%的参与者中观察到正常。我们观察到100%的参与者有正常的T1松弛时间,98%的参与者有正常的细胞外体积,98%的参与者有正常的T2松弛时间。covid -19前和covid -19后超声心动图的比较显示左心室射血分数(调整后的平均变化-1.37% (95% CI -2.57%, -0.17%))和整体纵向应变(1.32% (95% CI 0.50%, 2.15%))显著但较小的下降。比较有和没有持续症状的参与者,在调整后的cmr衍生心室容积、左室功能或心肌损伤的存在方面没有显著差异。结论:几乎所有康复的非住院COVID-19参与者的心室容量和功能都正常,没有相关的心肌损伤。
Longitudinal cardiac imaging for assessment of myocardial injury in non-hospitalised community-dwelling individuals after COVID-19 infection: the Rotterdam Study.
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the presence of myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation between persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and myocardial function in participants with known cardiovascular health status before infection.
Methods: In the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study cohort, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were performed among participants who recovered from COVID-19 at home within 2 years prior to inclusion in the current study. Persistent cardiac symptoms comprised only self-reported symptoms of chest pain, dyspnoea or palpitations lasting >4 weeks after COVID-19 infection. We used linear regression and linear mixed models to estimate and test age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) of (1) post-COVID-19 CMR-derived and echocardiographic-derived parameters among participants with and without persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms and (2) pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiographic assessments.
Results: 92 participants were included, with a mean age of 59±8 years of whom 52% were male. Normal post-COVID-19 CMR-derived left ventricular (LV) function and right ventricular ejection fraction were observed in 92% and 98% of participants, respectively. We observed normal native T1 relaxation times in 100%, normal extracellular volume in 98% and normal T2 relaxation times in 98% of the participants. Comparison of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiography revealed a significant but small decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (adjusted mean change -1.37% (95% CI -2.57%, -0.17%)) and global longitudinal strain (1.32% (95% CI 0.50%, 2.15%)). Comparing participants with and without persistent symptoms, there were no significant differences in adjusted CMR-derived ventricular volumes, LV function or presence of myocardial injury.
Conclusions: Almost all recovered non-hospitalised COVID-19 participants had normal CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function, without relevant myocardial injury.
期刊介绍:
Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.