功能性膝支具移除和长期使用对健康男性运动员表现的影响:下肢力量、加速度、速度和敏捷性。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of science and medicine in sport Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.004
Neetu Rishiraj, Jack E Taunton, Willian Regan, Robert Woollard, Rob Lloyd-Smith, Brian Niven
{"title":"功能性膝支具移除和长期使用对健康男性运动员表现的影响:下肢力量、加速度、速度和敏捷性。","authors":"Neetu Rishiraj, Jack E Taunton, Willian Regan, Robert Woollard, Rob Lloyd-Smith, Brian Niven","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Knee braces were introduced to sports 30 years ago. However, knee brace use for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention intervention remains contentious due to concerns about performance hindrances. Since knee brace use is a potential modifiable risk factor, we aimed to investigate the effect of discounting and continued functional knee brace (FKB) on lower extremity power-vertical jump (VJ), acceleration, speed, and agility performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort crossover study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy male athletes performed seven tests, over six days of 12 test sessions (S), during three test conditions (non-braced, braced, and removed brace or continued brace use). This study focuses on VJ, acceleration, speed, and agility performance during S12 when athletes were randomly selected to remove the FKB after 17.5 h or continue using the FKB for 21.0 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After brace removal, nonsignificant performance levels improved in the VJ (2.7 %; 95 % CI 52.5-62.8; Cohen's effect size (ES) = trivial), acceleration (1.8 %; 95 % CI 0.500-0.562; ES = small), and agility (0.5 %; 95 % CI 9.25-10.13; ES = trivial), while a nonsignificant slower speed was recorded (0.5 %; 95 % CI 1.81-1.95; ES = trivial). Continued brace use led to a nonsignificant performance improvement in all tests; VJ (3.1 %; 95 % CI 53.5-60.2; ES = small), acceleration (1.5 %; 95 % CI 0.511-0.561; ES = trivial), speed (1.0 %; 95 % CI 1.83-1.95; ES = trivial), and agility (1.8 %; 95 % CI 9.26-10.04; ES = trivial).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Removal of FKB led to improved performance in three performance tests, while continued brace use improved performance in all four tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance effects of functional knee brace removal and prolonged use in healthy male athlete: Lower extremity power, acceleration, speed, and agility.\",\"authors\":\"Neetu Rishiraj, Jack E Taunton, Willian Regan, Robert Woollard, Rob Lloyd-Smith, Brian Niven\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Knee braces were introduced to sports 30 years ago. However, knee brace use for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention intervention remains contentious due to concerns about performance hindrances. Since knee brace use is a potential modifiable risk factor, we aimed to investigate the effect of discounting and continued functional knee brace (FKB) on lower extremity power-vertical jump (VJ), acceleration, speed, and agility performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort crossover study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy male athletes performed seven tests, over six days of 12 test sessions (S), during three test conditions (non-braced, braced, and removed brace or continued brace use). This study focuses on VJ, acceleration, speed, and agility performance during S12 when athletes were randomly selected to remove the FKB after 17.5 h or continue using the FKB for 21.0 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After brace removal, nonsignificant performance levels improved in the VJ (2.7 %; 95 % CI 52.5-62.8; Cohen's effect size (ES) = trivial), acceleration (1.8 %; 95 % CI 0.500-0.562; ES = small), and agility (0.5 %; 95 % CI 9.25-10.13; ES = trivial), while a nonsignificant slower speed was recorded (0.5 %; 95 % CI 1.81-1.95; ES = trivial). Continued brace use led to a nonsignificant performance improvement in all tests; VJ (3.1 %; 95 % CI 53.5-60.2; ES = small), acceleration (1.5 %; 95 % CI 0.511-0.561; ES = trivial), speed (1.0 %; 95 % CI 1.83-1.95; ES = trivial), and agility (1.8 %; 95 % CI 9.26-10.04; ES = trivial).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Removal of FKB led to improved performance in three performance tests, while continued brace use improved performance in all four tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膝关节支架在30 年前被引入到运动中。然而,膝关节支架用于非接触前交叉韧带损伤预防干预仍然存在争议,因为担心性能障碍。由于膝关节支架的使用是一个潜在的可改变的风险因素,我们的目的是调查折扣和持续功能性膝关节支架(FKB)对下肢力量垂直跳跃(VJ),加速度,速度和敏捷性表现的影响。设计:前瞻性队列交叉研究。方法:27名健康男性运动员进行了7次测试,在12个测试阶段(S)的6天内进行了3种测试条件(不带支架、带支架、取下支架或继续使用支架)。这项研究的重点是在S12期间的VJ、加速度、速度和敏捷性表现,当运动员被随机选择在17.5 h后移除FKB或在21.0 h继续使用FKB时。结果:支具拔除后,VJ功能水平无明显改善(2.7% %;95 % ci 52.5-62.8;科恩效应量(ES) = 微不足道),加速度(1.8 %;95 % ci 0.500-0.562;ES = 小),敏捷性(0.5 %;95 % ci 9.25-10.13;ES = trivial),而记录的速度无显著减慢(0.5 %;95 % ci 1.81-1.95;ES = 微不足道)。继续使用大括号在所有测试中都没有显著的性能改善;VJ(3.1 %;95 % ci 53.5-60.2;ES = 小),加速度(1.5 %;95 % ci 0.511-0.561;ES = 琐碎),速度(1.0 %;95 % ci 1.83-1.95;ES = 微不足道)和敏捷性(1.8 %;95 % ci 9.26-10.04;ES = 微不足道)。结论:去除FKB可以提高三项性能测试的性能,而继续使用支具可以提高所有四项测试的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance effects of functional knee brace removal and prolonged use in healthy male athlete: Lower extremity power, acceleration, speed, and agility.

Objectives: Knee braces were introduced to sports 30 years ago. However, knee brace use for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention intervention remains contentious due to concerns about performance hindrances. Since knee brace use is a potential modifiable risk factor, we aimed to investigate the effect of discounting and continued functional knee brace (FKB) on lower extremity power-vertical jump (VJ), acceleration, speed, and agility performance.

Design: Prospective cohort crossover study.

Methods: Twenty-seven healthy male athletes performed seven tests, over six days of 12 test sessions (S), during three test conditions (non-braced, braced, and removed brace or continued brace use). This study focuses on VJ, acceleration, speed, and agility performance during S12 when athletes were randomly selected to remove the FKB after 17.5 h or continue using the FKB for 21.0 h.

Results: After brace removal, nonsignificant performance levels improved in the VJ (2.7 %; 95 % CI 52.5-62.8; Cohen's effect size (ES) = trivial), acceleration (1.8 %; 95 % CI 0.500-0.562; ES = small), and agility (0.5 %; 95 % CI 9.25-10.13; ES = trivial), while a nonsignificant slower speed was recorded (0.5 %; 95 % CI 1.81-1.95; ES = trivial). Continued brace use led to a nonsignificant performance improvement in all tests; VJ (3.1 %; 95 % CI 53.5-60.2; ES = small), acceleration (1.5 %; 95 % CI 0.511-0.561; ES = trivial), speed (1.0 %; 95 % CI 1.83-1.95; ES = trivial), and agility (1.8 %; 95 % CI 9.26-10.04; ES = trivial).

Conclusions: Removal of FKB led to improved performance in three performance tests, while continued brace use improved performance in all four tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Health problems in elite Para athletes - A prospective cohort study of 53,739 athlete days. The effects of COVID-19 on professional football: Clinical management, player performance, and vaccination impact. Editorial Board Sex-dependent responses to acute sodium bicarbonate different dose treatment: A randomized double-blind crossover study Exercise and Sports Science Australia updated position statement on exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1