Noah C. Ramsey BPharm(Hons), Gregory M. Peterson PhD, Corinne Mirkazemi PhD, Mohammed S. Salahudeen PhD
{"title":"非住院老年人处方医师接受药师推荐的影响因素:系统回顾与meta分析","authors":"Noah C. Ramsey BPharm(Hons), Gregory M. Peterson PhD, Corinne Mirkazemi PhD, Mohammed S. Salahudeen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the rate of, and factors affecting, acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations by medical prescribers following medication reviews conducted in non-hospitalized older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Older adults (mean aged ≥55 years) residing in the community or in aged care facilities (ie, non-hospitalized) who had received an individualized medication review by a pharmacist.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) from 2000 until May 2024, and included studies that reported the acceptance rates of pharmacists’ recommendations by prescribers, either by recommendation type (eg, initiation, cessation, dose change) or the reason for the recommendation (eg, drug-related problem identified). JBI tools were used to assess the methodological quality, and a meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 21 studies included in the review: 13 studies in the community setting, and 8 in aged care facilities. The acceptance rates of the pharmacists’ recommendations ranged from 42% to 93%, and the implementation rates ranged from 27% to 88%. The setting where the pharmacist conducted the review was found to be a significant determinant in the acceptance of recommendations in the meta-regression model (<em>P</em> = .021), with the highest acceptance and implementation rates reported when pharmacists were integrated into general medical practices (79%; 95% CI, 52%–97%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations following the conduct of medication reviews was highly variable. Multiple factors appear to influence acceptance rates, particularly the setting where the pharmacist conducted the review and the level of collaboration between the pharmacist and prescriber. Future research should explore targeted strategies to improve collaboration and communication between pharmacists and prescribers, such as the integration of pharmacists into general medical practices and aged care facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 105462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Medical Prescribers' Acceptance of Pharmacists’ Recommendations in Non-hospitalized Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Noah C. Ramsey BPharm(Hons), Gregory M. Peterson PhD, Corinne Mirkazemi PhD, Mohammed S. Salahudeen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the rate of, and factors affecting, acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations by medical prescribers following medication reviews conducted in non-hospitalized older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Older adults (mean aged ≥55 years) residing in the community or in aged care facilities (ie, non-hospitalized) who had received an individualized medication review by a pharmacist.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) from 2000 until May 2024, and included studies that reported the acceptance rates of pharmacists’ recommendations by prescribers, either by recommendation type (eg, initiation, cessation, dose change) or the reason for the recommendation (eg, drug-related problem identified). JBI tools were used to assess the methodological quality, and a meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 21 studies included in the review: 13 studies in the community setting, and 8 in aged care facilities. The acceptance rates of the pharmacists’ recommendations ranged from 42% to 93%, and the implementation rates ranged from 27% to 88%. The setting where the pharmacist conducted the review was found to be a significant determinant in the acceptance of recommendations in the meta-regression model (<em>P</em> = .021), with the highest acceptance and implementation rates reported when pharmacists were integrated into general medical practices (79%; 95% CI, 52%–97%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations following the conduct of medication reviews was highly variable. Multiple factors appear to influence acceptance rates, particularly the setting where the pharmacist conducted the review and the level of collaboration between the pharmacist and prescriber. Future research should explore targeted strategies to improve collaboration and communication between pharmacists and prescribers, such as the integration of pharmacists into general medical practices and aged care facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 105462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors Influencing Medical Prescribers' Acceptance of Pharmacists’ Recommendations in Non-hospitalized Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objectives
To investigate the rate of, and factors affecting, acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations by medical prescribers following medication reviews conducted in non-hospitalized older adults.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Setting and Participants
Older adults (mean aged ≥55 years) residing in the community or in aged care facilities (ie, non-hospitalized) who had received an individualized medication review by a pharmacist.
Methods
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) from 2000 until May 2024, and included studies that reported the acceptance rates of pharmacists’ recommendations by prescribers, either by recommendation type (eg, initiation, cessation, dose change) or the reason for the recommendation (eg, drug-related problem identified). JBI tools were used to assess the methodological quality, and a meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed.
Results
There were 21 studies included in the review: 13 studies in the community setting, and 8 in aged care facilities. The acceptance rates of the pharmacists’ recommendations ranged from 42% to 93%, and the implementation rates ranged from 27% to 88%. The setting where the pharmacist conducted the review was found to be a significant determinant in the acceptance of recommendations in the meta-regression model (P = .021), with the highest acceptance and implementation rates reported when pharmacists were integrated into general medical practices (79%; 95% CI, 52%–97%).
Conclusions and Implications
The acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations following the conduct of medication reviews was highly variable. Multiple factors appear to influence acceptance rates, particularly the setting where the pharmacist conducted the review and the level of collaboration between the pharmacist and prescriber. Future research should explore targeted strategies to improve collaboration and communication between pharmacists and prescribers, such as the integration of pharmacists into general medical practices and aged care facilities.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality