Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Lauren A Scanlon, Mathew Carter, Laura Moliner, Emine Cil, Raffaele Califano, Yvonne Summers, Fiona Blackhall, Colin R Lindsay, Jacob Lewis, Fabio Gomes
{"title":"一线奥西替尼与早期TKIs在晚期egfr突变NSCLC中的比较:现实世界的生存分析","authors":"Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Lauren A Scanlon, Mathew Carter, Laura Moliner, Emine Cil, Raffaele Califano, Yvonne Summers, Fiona Blackhall, Colin R Lindsay, Jacob Lewis, Fabio Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line osimertinib versus earlier-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a real-world setting. Secondary endpoint included OS in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. Exploratory aim focused on the impact of TKIs sequencing strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who started first-line treatment with either osimertinib or another EGFR TKI (afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib) at The Christie (Manchester, UK) from January 2014 to May 2023. Data were extracted from electronic health records, and survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 119 patients treated with first-line osimertinib and 217 with other EGFR TKIs. In the whole population, median age was 69 years (IQR 59.8-77) and 67.3 % of the patients had an ECOG 0-1. With a median follow-up of 73.2 months (95 % CI 66.2-115.7) and 30.6 months (95 % CI 26.0-38.4) in the earlier-generation TKIs and the osimertinib groups, respectively, the median OS was comparable (16.6 vs 16.9 months; HR = 1, p = 0.97). Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (n = 48; 14.3 %) had poorer survival compared to those with common mutations (HR = 1.664, p = 0.002). Amongst patients who received two treatment lines, those who received osimertinib after another TKI had a shorter OS than those who received osimertinib first-line followed by another line of therapy (HR = 2.062, p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line osimertinib showed comparable OS to earlier-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations had a poorer survival. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and to explore the cost-effectiveness of different sequencing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"200 ","pages":"108084"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line osimertinib compared to earlier generation TKIs in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC: A real-world survival analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Lauren A Scanlon, Mathew Carter, Laura Moliner, Emine Cil, Raffaele Califano, Yvonne Summers, Fiona Blackhall, Colin R Lindsay, Jacob Lewis, Fabio Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line osimertinib versus earlier-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a real-world setting. Secondary endpoint included OS in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. Exploratory aim focused on the impact of TKIs sequencing strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who started first-line treatment with either osimertinib or another EGFR TKI (afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib) at The Christie (Manchester, UK) from January 2014 to May 2023. Data were extracted from electronic health records, and survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 119 patients treated with first-line osimertinib and 217 with other EGFR TKIs. In the whole population, median age was 69 years (IQR 59.8-77) and 67.3 % of the patients had an ECOG 0-1. With a median follow-up of 73.2 months (95 % CI 66.2-115.7) and 30.6 months (95 % CI 26.0-38.4) in the earlier-generation TKIs and the osimertinib groups, respectively, the median OS was comparable (16.6 vs 16.9 months; HR = 1, p = 0.97). Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (n = 48; 14.3 %) had poorer survival compared to those with common mutations (HR = 1.664, p = 0.002). Amongst patients who received two treatment lines, those who received osimertinib after another TKI had a shorter OS than those who received osimertinib first-line followed by another line of therapy (HR = 2.062, p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line osimertinib showed comparable OS to earlier-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations had a poorer survival. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and to explore the cost-effectiveness of different sequencing approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"108084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较一线奥西替尼与早期EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括罕见EGFR突变患者的OS。探索性目的集中于TKIs测序策略的影响。方法:我们对2014年1月至2023年5月在英国曼彻斯特克里斯蒂医院(The Christie)接受奥西替尼或另一种EGFR TKI(阿法替尼、厄洛替尼或吉非替尼)一线治疗的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从电子健康记录中提取数据,并使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型分析生存结果。结果:我们确定了119例接受一线奥西替尼治疗的患者和217例接受其他EGFR TKIs治疗的患者。在整个人群中,中位年龄为69岁(IQR 59.8-77), 67.3%的患者ECOG为0-1。早期tki组和奥西替尼组的中位随访时间分别为73.2个月(95% CI 66.2-115.7)和30.6个月(95% CI 26.0-38.4),中位OS是相当的(16.6个月vs 16.9个月;HR = 1, p = 0.97)。罕见EGFR突变患者(n = 48;14.3%)的患者生存率较普通突变患者低(HR = 1.664, p = 0.002)。在接受两条治疗线的患者中,第一次TKI后接受奥西替尼治疗的患者的OS比第一次接受奥西替尼治疗后再接受另一条治疗的患者的OS短(HR = 2.062, p = 0.022)。结论:一线奥西替尼治疗晚期EGFR突变型NSCLC的OS与早期EGFR TKIs相当。具有罕见EGFR突变的患者生存率较低。需要进一步的研究来优化对罕见EGFR突变患者的治疗,并探索不同测序方法的成本效益。
First-line osimertinib compared to earlier generation TKIs in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC: A real-world survival analysis.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line osimertinib versus earlier-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a real-world setting. Secondary endpoint included OS in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. Exploratory aim focused on the impact of TKIs sequencing strategies.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who started first-line treatment with either osimertinib or another EGFR TKI (afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib) at The Christie (Manchester, UK) from January 2014 to May 2023. Data were extracted from electronic health records, and survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: We identified 119 patients treated with first-line osimertinib and 217 with other EGFR TKIs. In the whole population, median age was 69 years (IQR 59.8-77) and 67.3 % of the patients had an ECOG 0-1. With a median follow-up of 73.2 months (95 % CI 66.2-115.7) and 30.6 months (95 % CI 26.0-38.4) in the earlier-generation TKIs and the osimertinib groups, respectively, the median OS was comparable (16.6 vs 16.9 months; HR = 1, p = 0.97). Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (n = 48; 14.3 %) had poorer survival compared to those with common mutations (HR = 1.664, p = 0.002). Amongst patients who received two treatment lines, those who received osimertinib after another TKI had a shorter OS than those who received osimertinib first-line followed by another line of therapy (HR = 2.062, p = 0.022).
Conclusion: First-line osimertinib showed comparable OS to earlier-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations had a poorer survival. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and to explore the cost-effectiveness of different sequencing approaches.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.