周围神经刺激的现实世界长期结果:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605
Darwin Luna, Gabrielle Hettie, Luke Pirrotta, Vafi Salmasi, Jennifer M Hah
{"title":"周围神经刺激的现实世界长期结果:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Darwin Luna, Gabrielle Hettie, Luke Pirrotta, Vafi Salmasi, Jennifer M Hah","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) at a tertiary pain management center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty adults who underwent PNS for CNP between June 2015 and September 2021 completed pain and psychosocial assessments in the 6 months before, and 2-3 years after PNS treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short From (3A). Psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to receiving PNS, long-term responders reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders (PROMIS depression t-score 50.3 [10.7] vs 57.9 [8.9]; p-value = 0.05). Eleven participants (36.7%) reported long-term treatment response. There was a significantly greater improvement in pain intensity among responders compared to non-responders who reported increased pain (PROMIS Pain Intensity score -9.0 [-4.2] vs. +3.1[+3.2]; p-value < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients report clinically meaningful long-term pain relief after receiving PNS through both 60-day and permanent implant systems, with significant reductions in pain intensity observed in long-term responders. Long-term responders reported fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders prior to receiving therapy, emphasizing the importance of psychological screening and psychological optimization prior to receiving PNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Darwin Luna, Gabrielle Hettie, Luke Pirrotta, Vafi Salmasi, Jennifer M Hah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) at a tertiary pain management center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty adults who underwent PNS for CNP between June 2015 and September 2021 completed pain and psychosocial assessments in the 6 months before, and 2-3 years after PNS treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short From (3A). Psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to receiving PNS, long-term responders reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders (PROMIS depression t-score 50.3 [10.7] vs 57.9 [8.9]; p-value = 0.05). Eleven participants (36.7%) reported long-term treatment response. There was a significantly greater improvement in pain intensity among responders compared to non-responders who reported increased pain (PROMIS Pain Intensity score -9.0 [-4.2] vs. +3.1[+3.2]; p-value < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients report clinically meaningful long-term pain relief after receiving PNS through both 60-day and permanent implant systems, with significant reductions in pain intensity observed in long-term responders. Long-term responders reported fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders prior to receiving therapy, emphasizing the importance of psychological screening and psychological optimization prior to receiving PNS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估周围神经刺激(PNS)在三级疼痛管理中心治疗慢性神经性疼痛(CNP)的真实结果。方法:30名在2015年6月至2021年9月期间接受PNS治疗CNP的成年人在PNS治疗前6个月和治疗后2-3年完成了疼痛和心理社会评估。使用NIH患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)测量疼痛强度(3A)。心理社会结果包括抑郁、焦虑和睡眠障碍也被测量。结果:在接受PNS之前,长期应答者报告的抑郁症状明显少于无应答者(PROMIS抑郁t评分50.3 [10.7]vs 57.9 [8.9];p值= 0.05)。11名参与者(36.7%)报告了长期治疗反应。与无反应者相比,有反应者疼痛强度的改善明显更大(PROMIS疼痛强度评分-9.0[-4.2]对+3.1[+3.2];p值结论:患者报告通过60天和永久性植入系统接受PNS后临床意义的长期疼痛缓解,长期应答者观察到疼痛强度显着降低。与无反应者相比,长期反应者在接受治疗前报告的抑郁症状较少,这强调了在接受PNS之前进行心理筛查和心理优化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation: a prospective observational study.

Aim: We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) at a tertiary pain management center.

Methods: Thirty adults who underwent PNS for CNP between June 2015 and September 2021 completed pain and psychosocial assessments in the 6 months before, and 2-3 years after PNS treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short From (3A). Psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance were also measured.

Results: Prior to receiving PNS, long-term responders reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders (PROMIS depression t-score 50.3 [10.7] vs 57.9 [8.9]; p-value = 0.05). Eleven participants (36.7%) reported long-term treatment response. There was a significantly greater improvement in pain intensity among responders compared to non-responders who reported increased pain (PROMIS Pain Intensity score -9.0 [-4.2] vs. +3.1[+3.2]; p-value < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients report clinically meaningful long-term pain relief after receiving PNS through both 60-day and permanent implant systems, with significant reductions in pain intensity observed in long-term responders. Long-term responders reported fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders prior to receiving therapy, emphasizing the importance of psychological screening and psychological optimization prior to receiving PNS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Post-discharge opioid utilization patterns in orthopedic patients are underestimated: an explorative study. An overlooked cause of upper extremity pain: myofascial trigger points of the triceps muscle and dry needling protocol. Open label placebo for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Informal caregivers' burden and chronic pain in older adults: a dyadic study unveiling the correlation and its impact. A unique utilization of scrambler therapy for bilateral neuropathic corneal pain: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1